On Sun, May 14, 2000 at 01:25:16PM -0600, Lyndon Nerenberg wrote:
I like the idea, but the -l flag conflicts with a different usage for
SVR4 derived makes (on at least AIX, Irix, and Solaris):
-l load
Specifies that no new jobs (commands) should be started
I like the idea, but the -l flag conflicts with a different usage for
SVR4 derived makes (on at least AIX, Irix, and Solaris):
-l load
Specifies that no new jobs (commands) should be started
if there are others jobs running and the load average
On Sun, May 14, 2000 at 03:46:40PM -0400, Will Andrews wrote:
Ok, what do other people think? I mean, it'd be easy to change the flag to
use this feature. -dl seems fine for this particular feature.
-dX is a better place to put this than "-l", as this is a debugging
feature.
--
-- David
On Sun, May 14, 2000 at 02:50:02PM -0500, Steve Price wrote:
I too like this idea and along the lines of what Lyndon suggested
how about the attached patch instead?
This is a better patch to the proposed functionality.
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe
Hi all,
Some time ago I was complaining about how there is no way to force make(1)
to display the commands executed by @-prefixed commands in Makefiles. So I
went around and talked to a few people and one guy clued me in on how I
would add something like this (sorry, I don't remember the name
Chuck Compatibility with those other makes is pretty low to begin
Chuck with, but it doesn't hurt, I guess, to allow for this. -dl
Chuck is ok with me. I just wouldn't consider the compatibility
Chuck thing a real issue if it weren't this easy to satisfy.
It's not a big deal
