On Thu, Feb 12, 2015 at 10:17:28PM -0500, Shawn Webb wrote:
On Thursday, February 12, 2015 06:38:29 PM Manfred Antar wrote:
make install in usr.bin/chpass broken on current:
(chpass)5006}make install
install -s -o root -g wheel -m 4555 -fschg -S chpass /usr/bin/chpass
install -o root
make install in usr.bin/chpass broken on current:
(chpass)5006}make install
install -s -o root -g wheel -m 4555 -fschg -S chpass /usr/bin/chpass
install -o root -g wheel -m 444 chpass.1.gz /usr/share/man/man1
/usr/share/man/man1/chfn.1.gz - /usr/share/man/man1/chpass.1.gz
On Thursday, February 12, 2015 06:38:29 PM Manfred Antar wrote:
make install in usr.bin/chpass broken on current:
(chpass)5006}make install
install -s -o root -g wheel -m 4555 -fschg -S chpass /usr/bin/chpass
install -o root -g wheel -m 444 chpass.1.gz /usr/share/man/man1
weather# make installworld
Running test variables
PASS: Test variables detected no regression, output matches.
Running test targets
PASS: Test targets detected no regression.
Running test sysvmatch
PASS: Test sysvmatch detected no regression.
Running test lhs_expn
PASS: Test lhs_expn detected no
On Sun, 30 Jan 2000, John Polstra wrote:
It's source-dir is called "xinstall" btw.
Why is the source called "xinstall"?
To avoid colliding with the standard make target "install". If we
had utilities named "all", "depend", and "clean" we'd have to do the
same thing for them.
Mhmmm...
On Mon, 31 Jan 2000, you wrote:
On Sun, 30 Jan 2000, John Polstra wrote:
It's source-dir is called "xinstall" btw.
Why is the source called "xinstall"?
To avoid colliding with the standard make target "install". If we
had utilities named "all", "depend", and "clean" we'd have to
Andrzej Bialecki wrote:
On Sun, 30 Jan 2000, John Polstra wrote:
It's source-dir is called "xinstall" btw.
Why is the source called "xinstall"?
To avoid colliding with the standard make target "install". If we
had utilities named "all", "depend", and "clean" we'd have to do the
Good analysis deleted...
src/usr.bin/xinstall could probably have been named src/usr.bin/install,
but PROG has to be xinstall regardless. I guess they kept the two as
xinstall for consistancy and in case there were other gotcha's like this.
But you forgot what happens if you have a ``file''
"Rodney W. Grimes" wrote:
Good analysis deleted...
src/usr.bin/xinstall could probably have been named src/usr.bin/install,
but PROG has to be xinstall regardless. I guess they kept the two as
xinstall for consistancy and in case there were other gotcha's like this.
But you forgot
"Rodney W. Grimes" wrote:
Good analysis deleted...
src/usr.bin/xinstall could probably have been named src/usr.bin/install,
but PROG has to be xinstall regardless. I guess they kept the two as
xinstall for consistancy and in case there were other gotcha's like this.
But you
I'm seeing the following failure on my -current box with sources cvsupped last
night about 11:30 est.
=== bin/ps
install -C -c -s -o root -g wheel -m 555 ps /bin
install -C -c -o root -g wheel -m 444 ps.1.gz /usr/share/man/man1
=== bin/pwd
install -C -c -s -o root -g wheel -m 555 pwd /bin
You need to manually recompile and install your "install" command.
It's source-dir is called "xinstall" btw.
Poul-Henning
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], bush doctor writes:
I'm seeing the following failure on my -current box with sources cvsupped last
night about 11:30 est.
=== bin/ps
Out of da blue Poul-Henning Kamp aka ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) said:
You need to manually recompile and install your "install" command.
Thanxs. I had looked at this, but wasn't sure.
It's source-dir is called "xinstall" btw.
Why is the source called "xinstall"?
Poul-Henning
In message
13 matches
Mail list logo
