Re: need patch review - NFS fixes for IP binding

1999-11-11 Thread Bill Fumerola
On Thu, 11 Nov 1999, Joe Greco wrote: And, despite those efforts, some of us went and bludgeoned the code into a more trivial case ("bind to address nn.nn.nn.nn") for local use anyways. Looks like the jail code will do something similar w/o source changes. isc-dhcpd is even uglier in this

need patch review - NFS fixes for IP binding

1999-11-09 Thread Matthew Dillon
The patch is available at: http://www.backplane.com/FreeBSD4/ The patch attempts to solve PR kern/13049 in a slightly different manner then the solution given by Ian in the PR. In a nutshell, the problem that we have is that nfsd may return a respond to an NFS request

Re: need patch review - NFS fixes for IP binding

1999-11-09 Thread Nate Williams
Instead, I have adopted and cleaned up the kernel portions of the patch and modified nfsd to allow the binding ip/host to be specified on the command line. Thus nfsd can be run bound to a specific IP address. This sounds like a great solution, thanks Matt! Nate To

Re: need patch review - NFS fixes for IP binding

1999-11-09 Thread David Malone
On Tue, Nov 09, 1999 at 11:26:51AM -0800, Matthew Dillon wrote: Instead, I have adopted and cleaned up the kernel portions of the patch and modified nfsd to allow the binding ip/host to be specified on the command line. Thus nfsd can be run bound to a specific IP address. This

Re: need patch review - NFS fixes for IP binding

1999-11-09 Thread Matthew Dillon
:This patch isn't very good for us as we need to be able to bind :nfsd to several IP addresses and still have it reply on the correct :interface and I think your patch only allows one to be specified :per set of nfsds? : :At the least we need to be able to specify multiple IP addresses :and a