Re: new panic under -current

2002-01-18 Thread Michael Reifenberger
[EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: new panic under -current On Mon, 14 Jan 2002, Alfred Perlstein wrote: ... Can you cvsup and try to reproduce this? Maybe. Today I did: - reducing my mainmem to 64M using hw.physmem=64M - compiling and cleaning some packages garaphics/[mplayer|ogle] a few times

new panic under -current

2002-01-14 Thread Michael Reifenberger
Hi, a new panic while surfing under X: GNU gdb 4.18 Copyright 1998 Free Software Foundation, Inc. GDB is free software, covered by the GNU General Public License, and you are welcome to change it and/or distribute copies of it under certain conditions. Type show copying to see the conditions.

Re: new panic under -current

2002-01-14 Thread Sheldon Hearn
On Mon, 14 Jan 2002 20:43:11 +0100, Michael Reifenberger wrote: syncing disks... panic: bwrite: buffer is not busy??? Uptime: 4h47m36s I can get these pretty easily by using modules that are out of sync with the kernel. Ciao, Sheldon. To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with

Re: new panic under -current

2002-01-14 Thread John Baldwin
On 14-Jan-02 Sheldon Hearn wrote: On Mon, 14 Jan 2002 20:43:11 +0100, Michael Reifenberger wrote: syncing disks... panic: bwrite: buffer is not busy??? Uptime: 4h47m36s I can get these pretty easily by using modules that are out of sync with the kernel. That wasn't his real panic.

Re: new panic under -current

2002-01-14 Thread Sheldon Hearn
On Mon, 14 Jan 2002 12:37:16 PST, John Baldwin wrote: I can get these pretty easily by using modules that are out of sync with the kernel. That wasn't his real panic. If you read teh whole log, a vrele() called from fdrop_locked() did a vput(0x0), i.e. vput(NULL) which resulted in a

Re: new panic under -current

2002-01-14 Thread Alfred Perlstein
* Michael Reifenberger [EMAIL PROTECTED] [020114 11:47] wrote: Hi, a new panic while surfing under X: Can you cvsup and try to reproduce this? -Alfred To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with unsubscribe freebsd-current in the body of the message

Re: new panic under -current

2002-01-14 Thread Michael Reifenberger
On Mon, 14 Jan 2002, Alfred Perlstein wrote: ... Can you cvsup and try to reproduce this? Do you have some new -current patches in mind which could affect the problem? My -current is as of today (with some local patches from bde regarding slice-handling which shouldn't be related here). I've