Re: optimization/10189: pentium4 breaks suns libm code for__ieee754_pow(double x, double y)

2003-03-28 Thread David O'Brien
On Wed, Mar 26, 2003 at 10:09:34PM +0100, Alexander Leidinger wrote: And trust me, as long as gcc ships with a description of other optimizations beneath -O there will be (clueless or smart... does it really matter here?) people which will try those optimizations on everything Not to mention

Re: optimization/10189: pentium4 breaks suns libm code for__ieee754_pow(double x, double y)

2003-03-26 Thread ljrittle
Synopsis: pentium4 breaks suns libm code for __ieee754_pow(double x, double y) State-Changed-From-To: open-feedback State-Changed-By: ljrittle State-Changed-When: Wed Mar 26 13:01:17 2003 State-Changed-Why: (Noting where this response was set to go, I decided to indulged to send an updated

Re: optimization/10189: pentium4 breaks suns libm code for__ieee754_pow(double x, double y)

2003-03-26 Thread David O'Brien
On Wed, Mar 26, 2003 at 01:01:18PM -, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Synopsis: pentium4 breaks suns libm code for __ieee754_pow(double x, double y) Beautiful email!! Special secret #2: Although the FSF-side does want to improve all code generation (and I think proper PRs RE CPU

Re: optimization/10189: pentium4 breaks suns libm code for__ieee754_pow(double x, double y)

2003-03-26 Thread Alexander Leidinger
On 26 Mar 2003 13:01:18 - [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Synopsis: pentium4 breaks suns libm code for __ieee754_pow(double x, double y) [...] FreeBSD src tree; and (c) that really cares about building FreeBSD src with special CPU settings (do you guys really see enough speedup to warrant