> Now I think I'll try to rebuild the kernel with "options ATA_CAM" and drop
> "device atapicam".
>
> This question needs to be better resolved in time for FreeBSD 9.0-RELEASE.
>
> I cross-post this message to freebsd-current@freebsd.org so the developers
> will see it. FreeBSD users want to be ab
> On 11/27/11, Lowell Gilbert wrote:
> > "b. f." writes:
> >>> > > What is the role of "options atapicam" and "device ATA_CAM" in kernel
> >>> > > config file?
> >>> > > Are they redundant? Kernel will build with both these options, but
> >>> > > will it make things go awry? Is ATA_CAM deprec
