Re: panic from _mutex_assert in kern_lock.c

2002-10-08 Thread Jeff Roberson
On Sat, 5 Oct 2002, Brian F. Feldman wrote: Steven G. Kargl [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: The source tree was retrieved by cvsup at 21:47 (PST) on Oct 4. This is a non-GEOM and non-acpi kernel. I have the core and kernel.debug, so any further postmortem is possible. I think the

Re: panic from _mutex_assert in kern_lock.c

2002-10-08 Thread Steven G. Kargl
Jeff Roberson said: On Sat, 5 Oct 2002, Brian F. Feldman wrote: Steven G. Kargl [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: The source tree was retrieved by cvsup at 21:47 (PST) on Oct 4. This is a non-GEOM and non-acpi kernel. I have the core and kernel.debug, so any further postmortem is possible.

panic from _mutex_assert in kern_lock.c

2002-10-05 Thread Steven G. Kargl
The source tree was retrieved by cvsup at 21:47 (PST) on Oct 4. This is a non-GEOM and non-acpi kernel. I have the core and kernel.debug, so any further postmortem is possible. -- Steve http://troutmask.apl.washington.edu/~kargl/ panic: from debugger panic messages: --- panic: mutex vnode

Re: panic from _mutex_assert in kern_lock.c

2002-10-05 Thread Brian F. Feldman
Steven G. Kargl [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: The source tree was retrieved by cvsup at 21:47 (PST) on Oct 4. This is a non-GEOM and non-acpi kernel. I have the core and kernel.debug, so any further postmortem is possible. I think the problem is that in src/sys/ufs/ffs/

Re: panic from _mutex_assert in kern_lock.c

2002-10-05 Thread Steven G. Kargl
Brian F. Feldman said: Steven G. Kargl [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: The source tree was retrieved by cvsup at 21:47 (PST) on Oct 4. This is a non-GEOM and non-acpi kernel. I have the core and kernel.debug, so any further postmortem is possible. I think the problem is that in

Re: panic from _mutex_assert in kern_lock.c

2002-10-05 Thread Brian F. Feldman
Steven G. Kargl [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Brian F. Feldman said: Steven G. Kargl [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: The source tree was retrieved by cvsup at 21:47 (PST) on Oct 4. This is a non-GEOM and non-acpi kernel. I have the core and kernel.debug, so any further postmortem is

Re: panic from _mutex_assert in kern_lock.c

2002-10-05 Thread Robert Watson
On Sat, 5 Oct 2002, Steven G. Kargl wrote: I came to the same conclusion after I sent the original email. What I don't understand is how I ended up in ffs_snapshot(), because I don't have a snapshot of /var. I tried snapshots when Kirk first introduced the feature, but I removed all of

Re: panic from _mutex_assert in kern_lock.c

2002-10-05 Thread Steven G. Kargl
Robert Watson said: On Sat, 5 Oct 2002, Steven G. Kargl wrote: One other point, the machine was doing a background fsck on /var. Does a background fsck go through ffs_snapshot()? Yes -- the background file system checker creates a snapshot of the file system in the un-checked