On Sat, 5 Oct 2002, Brian F. Feldman wrote:
Steven G. Kargl [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The source tree was retrieved by cvsup
at 21:47 (PST) on Oct 4.
This is a non-GEOM and non-acpi kernel.
I have the core and kernel.debug, so any
further postmortem is possible.
I think the
Jeff Roberson said:
On Sat, 5 Oct 2002, Brian F. Feldman wrote:
Steven G. Kargl [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The source tree was retrieved by cvsup
at 21:47 (PST) on Oct 4.
This is a non-GEOM and non-acpi kernel.
I have the core and kernel.debug, so any
further postmortem is possible.
The source tree was retrieved by cvsup
at 21:47 (PST) on Oct 4.
This is a non-GEOM and non-acpi kernel.
I have the core and kernel.debug, so any
further postmortem is possible.
--
Steve
http://troutmask.apl.washington.edu/~kargl/
panic: from debugger
panic messages:
---
panic: mutex vnode
Steven G. Kargl [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The source tree was retrieved by cvsup
at 21:47 (PST) on Oct 4.
This is a non-GEOM and non-acpi kernel.
I have the core and kernel.debug, so any
further postmortem is possible.
I think the problem is that in src/sys/ufs/ffs/
Brian F. Feldman said:
Steven G. Kargl [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The source tree was retrieved by cvsup
at 21:47 (PST) on Oct 4.
This is a non-GEOM and non-acpi kernel.
I have the core and kernel.debug, so any
further postmortem is possible.
I think the problem is that in
Steven G. Kargl [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Brian F. Feldman said:
Steven G. Kargl [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The source tree was retrieved by cvsup
at 21:47 (PST) on Oct 4.
This is a non-GEOM and non-acpi kernel.
I have the core and kernel.debug, so any
further postmortem is
On Sat, 5 Oct 2002, Steven G. Kargl wrote:
I came to the same conclusion after I sent the original email.
What I don't understand is how I ended up in ffs_snapshot(), because I
don't have a snapshot of /var. I tried snapshots when Kirk first
introduced the feature, but I removed all of
Robert Watson said:
On Sat, 5 Oct 2002, Steven G. Kargl wrote:
One other point, the machine was doing a background fsck on /var. Does
a background fsck go through ffs_snapshot()?
Yes -- the background file system checker creates a snapshot of the file
system in the un-checked