On Sat, 28 Dec 2002, Matthew Dillon wrote:
> The swapctl code has been comitted. Bruce, you never supplied feedback
> in regards to your original nits, but feel free to clean the code up
> now that it has been comitted. All other bullets have been taken care
> of.
I'm not sure i
[Reply to old mail]
On Wed, 18 Dec 2002, Matthew Dillon wrote:
> :Looks good to me, modulo a few nits. I try not to nitpick, but
> :I've mentioned a few of them below. (BDE does a better job of it
> :than I do anyway. :-)
> :
> :The patch puts identical functionality in two places, so maybe it
The swapctl code has been comitted. Bruce, you never supplied feedback
in regards to your original nits, but feel free to clean the code up
now that it has been comitted. All other bullets have been taken care
of.
I'm still on the fence in regards to backporting it. I would
Thus spake Matthew Dillon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> :Looks good to me, modulo a few nits. I try not to nitpick, but
> :I've mentioned a few of them below. (BDE does a better job of it
> :than I do anyway. :-)
> :
> :The patch puts identical functionality in two places, so maybe it
> :would make sen
:
:On Wed, 18 Dec 2002, Matthew Dillon wrote:
:
:> Here's another update. I cleaned things up even more, add BLOCKSIZE
:> support, and updated the manual page. It looks quite nice now.
:
:I still dislike it. It starts by adding style bugs to the Makefile
:(changing "=" to "+=" for the i
:Looks good to me, modulo a few nits. I try not to nitpick, but
:I've mentioned a few of them below. (BDE does a better job of it
:than I do anyway. :-)
:
:The patch puts identical functionality in two places, so maybe it
:would make sense to rip support for -s out of pstat/swapinfo (and
:integ
Looks good to me, modulo a few nits. I try not to nitpick, but
I've mentioned a few of them below. (BDE does a better job of it
than I do anyway. :-)
The patch puts identical functionality in two places, so maybe it
would make sense to rip support for -s out of pstat/swapinfo (and
integrate 'ps
On Wed, 18 Dec 2002, Matthew Dillon wrote:
> Here's another update. I cleaned things up even more, add BLOCKSIZE
> support, and updated the manual page. It looks quite nice now.
I still dislike it. It starts by adding style bugs to the Makefile
(changing "=" to "+=" for the initial ass
Here's another update. I cleaned things up even more, add BLOCKSIZE
support, and updated the manual page. It looks quite nice now.
-Matt
Index: Makefile
===
RCS file: /home/nc
