Re: pkg.c revision 367687 breaks pkg

2020-11-15 Thread Michael Butler
4 /usr/local/sbin/pkg* Reverting to SVN r367686 works correctly. mailwrapper is similarly broekn, imb On 11/15/20 1:55 PM, Scott Long wrote: This is fixed in revision 367701 Scott On Nov 15, 2020, at 11:52 AM, Manfred Antar wrote: pkg.c revision 367687 breaks pkg : (pkg)50

Re: pkg.c revision 367687 breaks pkg

2020-11-15 Thread Stefan Esser
Am 15.11.20 um 21:34 schrieb Kyle Evans: On Sun, Nov 15, 2020 at 2:05 PM Stefan Esser wrote: Am 15.11.20 um 20:41 schrieb Kyle Evans: This is a separate (valid) problem, but not directly related to Scott's work here. sysctlbyname now goes directly to the kernel with no chance for the user.*

Re: pkg.c revision 367687 breaks pkg

2020-11-15 Thread Kyle Evans
On Sun, Nov 15, 2020 at 2:05 PM Stefan Esser wrote: > > Am 15.11.20 um 20:41 schrieb Kyle Evans: > > This is a separate (valid) problem, but not directly related to > > Scott's work here. sysctlbyname now goes directly to the kernel with > > no chance for the user.* sysctls to intercept. That

Re: pkg.c revision 367687 breaks pkg

2020-11-15 Thread Scott Long
> On Nov 15, 2020, at 1:05 PM, Stefan Esser wrote: > > Am 15.11.20 um 20:41 schrieb Kyle Evans: >> This is a separate (valid) problem, but not directly related to >> Scott's work here. sysctlbyname now goes directly to the kernel with >> no chance for the user.* sysctls to intercept. That

Re: pkg.c revision 367687 breaks pkg

2020-11-15 Thread Stefan Esser
Am 15.11.20 um 20:41 schrieb Kyle Evans: This is a separate (valid) problem, but not directly related to Scott's work here. sysctlbyname now goes directly to the kernel with no chance for the user.* sysctls to intercept. That should independently be fixed to maintain the illusion that they're

Re: pkg.c revision 367687 breaks pkg

2020-11-15 Thread Scott Long
> On Nov 15, 2020, at 12:41 PM, Kyle Evans wrote: > > On Sun, Nov 15, 2020 at 1:33 PM Guy Yur wrote: >> >> On 15/11/20 8:55 pm, Scott Long wrote: >>> This is fixed in revision 367701 >>> >>> Scott >> >> Hi, >> >> I am on revision 367710 (newer) and have the same problem. >> sysctlbyname()

Re: pkg.c revision 367687 breaks pkg

2020-11-15 Thread Kyle Evans
On Sun, Nov 15, 2020 at 1:33 PM Guy Yur wrote: > > On 15/11/20 8:55 pm, Scott Long wrote: > > This is fixed in revision 367701 > > > > Scott > > Hi, > > I am on revision 367710 (newer) and have the same problem. > sysctlbyname() returns an empty string and length of 1. > sysctl() with name

Re: pkg.c revision 367687 breaks pkg

2020-11-15 Thread Guy Yur
cal : 11 Thanks, Guy Yur On Nov 15, 2020, at 11:52 AM, Manfred Antar wrote: pkg.c revision 367687 breaks pkg : (pkg)5052}pkg The package management tool is not yet installed on your system. Do you want to fetch and install it now? [y/N]: This is after upgrading to the latest pkg and libu

Re: pkg.c revision 367687 breaks pkg

2020-11-15 Thread Scott Long
This is fixed in revision 367701 Scott > On Nov 15, 2020, at 11:52 AM, Manfred Antar wrote: > > pkg.c revision 367687 breaks pkg : > > (pkg)5052}pkg > The package management tool is not yet installed on your system. > Do you want to fetch and install it now? [y/N]

pkg.c revision 367687 breaks pkg

2020-11-15 Thread Manfred Antar
pkg.c revision 367687 breaks pkg : (pkg)5052}pkg The package management tool is not yet installed on your system. Do you want to fetch and install it now? [y/N]: This is after upgrading to the latest pkg and libutil. pkg.c version 367075 works: (pkg)5057}pkg pkg: not enough arguments Usage