I dont know if this is cause by -current, I have not yet try on the
-stable. However, I just write here, maybe someone can help me.. :P
recently, I wrote a multithread network server for my work. what it does
is to accept TCP connection from remote, and then put it into a new
thread. I have
On Fri, 8 Jun 2001, Idea Receiver wrote:
I dont know if this is cause by -current, I have not yet try on the
-stable. However, I just write here, maybe someone can help me.. :P
recently, I wrote a multithread network server for my work. what it does
is to accept TCP connection from remote,
I dont know if this is cause by -current, I have not yet try on the
-stable. However, I just write here, maybe someone can help me.. :P
recently, I wrote a multithread network server for my work. what it does
is to accept TCP connection from remote, and then put it into a new
thread. I have
I dont know if this is cause by -current, I have not yet try on the
-stable. However, I just write here, maybe someone can help me.. :P
recently, I wrote a multithread network server for my work. what it does
is to accept TCP connection from remote, and then put it into a new
thread. I have
I dont know if this is cause by -current, I have not yet try on the
-stable. However, I just write here, maybe someone can help me.. :P
recently, I wrote a multithread network server for my work. what it does
is to accept TCP connection from remote, and then put it into a new
thread. I have
I dont know if this is cause by -current, I have not yet try on the
-stable. However, I just write here, maybe someone can help me.. :P
recently, I wrote a multithread network server for my work. what it does
is to accept TCP connection from remote, and then put it into a new
thread. I have
Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault.
0x28121637 in _fd_lock_backout () from /usr/lib/libc_r.so.4
You're not running -current if you're using libc_r.so.4.
We're at libc_r.so.5. And fd locks have also been disabled
in -current.
err~~ sorry about my stupid... i
On Thu, Jun 07, 2001 at 09:33:22PM +1000, Idea Receiver wrote:
I dont know if this is cause by -current, I have not yet try on the
-stable. However, I just write here, maybe someone can help me.. :P
recently, I wrote a multithread network server for my work. what it does
is to accept TCP