>
> On Sat, 11 Dec 1999, Kenneth Wayne Culver wrote:
>
> > I don't know if anyone else was having this problem, and I don't know that
> > this is a proper fix, but here goes:
> >
> > For some reason rtc0 was not work
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Kenneth Wayne
Culver writes:
: For some reason rtc0 was not working, and I think it's because this
: variable was not initialized, here is the patch:
: -int statclock_disable;
: +int statclock_disable = 0;
There is no difference between these two
www.wam.umd.edu/~culverk/|
=
On Sat, 11 Dec 1999, Kenneth Wayne Culver wrote:
> I don't know if anyone else was having this problem, and I don't know that
> this is a proper fix, but here goes:
>
> For some rea
I don't know if anyone else was having this problem, and I don't know that
this is a proper fix, but here goes:
For some reason rtc0 was not working, and I think it's because this
variable was not initialized, here is the patch:
--- clock.c.origSat Dec 11 19:58:15 1
re is because rtc0 seems to be missing. I don't know why, but when I
recompiled the kernel with gcc 2.95.2, this device just suddenly
dissappeared. Any suggestions?
=
| Kenneth Culver | FreeBSD: The best
For some reason, after recompiling the kernel over the last few days,
systat -vm no longer even shows an rtc0 device. It only shows the clk
device. I know this is not supposed to happen, so can anyone give me any
ideas on how to fix the problem
