Re: should aarch64 cross-build work at amd64?

2016-09-28 Thread Ross Alexander
On Fri, 23 Sep 2016 22:19:15 +, Glenn Barber wrote: On Sat, Sep 24, 2016 at 12:54:05AM +0300, Boris Samorodov wrote: > 24.09.2016 00:44, Boris Samorodov ?: > > 24.09.2016 00:39, Glen Barber ?: > >> On Sat, Sep 24, 2016 at 12:35:30AM +0300, Boris Samorodov wrote: > >>> make[1]:

Re: should aarch64 cross-build work at amd64?

2016-09-28 Thread Boris Samorodov
28.09.2016 07:22, Glen Barber пишет: > On Tue, Sep 27, 2016 at 09:46:29PM -0600, Ross Alexander wrote: >> On Fri, 23 Sep 2016 22:19:15 +, Glenn Barber wrote: >> >>> On Sat, Sep 24, 2016 at 12:54:05AM +0300, Boris Samorodov wrote: 24.09.2016 00:44, Boris Samorodov ?: > 24.09.2016

Re: should aarch64 cross-build work at amd64?

2016-09-28 Thread Mikaël Urankar
2016-09-28 6:22 GMT+02:00 Glen Barber : >> The more I read this, the less I understand. I've built and install'd >> aarch64-binutils on my poud box, then created an "-x -a arm64.aarch64 -m svn" >> jail - which worked fine - but that jail won't build anything. No >> /usr/bin/ld,

Re: should aarch64 cross-build work at amd64?

2016-09-27 Thread Glen Barber
On Tue, Sep 27, 2016 at 09:46:29PM -0600, Ross Alexander wrote: > On Fri, 23 Sep 2016 22:19:15 +, Glenn Barber wrote: > > >On Sat, Sep 24, 2016 at 12:54:05AM +0300, Boris Samorodov wrote: > >> 24.09.2016 00:44, Boris Samorodov ?: > >> > 24.09.2016 00:39, Glen Barber ?: > >> >> On Sat,

Re: should aarch64 cross-build work at amd64?

2016-09-23 Thread Glen Barber
On Sat, Sep 24, 2016 at 01:56:54AM +0300, Boris Samorodov wrote: > 24.09.2016 01:19, Glen Barber пишет: > > On Sat, Sep 24, 2016 at 12:54:05AM +0300, Boris Samorodov wrote: > >> 24.09.2016 00:44, Boris Samorodov пишет: > >>> 24.09.2016 00:39, Glen Barber пишет: > On Sat, Sep 24, 2016 at

Re: should aarch64 cross-build work at amd64?

2016-09-23 Thread Boris Samorodov
24.09.2016 01:19, Glen Barber пишет: > On Sat, Sep 24, 2016 at 12:54:05AM +0300, Boris Samorodov wrote: >> 24.09.2016 00:44, Boris Samorodov пишет: >>> 24.09.2016 00:39, Glen Barber пишет: On Sat, Sep 24, 2016 at 12:35:30AM +0300, Boris Samorodov wrote: > make[1]:

Re: should aarch64 cross-build work at amd64?

2016-09-23 Thread Glen Barber
On Sat, Sep 24, 2016 at 12:54:05AM +0300, Boris Samorodov wrote: > 24.09.2016 00:44, Boris Samorodov пишет: > > 24.09.2016 00:39, Glen Barber пишет: > >> On Sat, Sep 24, 2016 at 12:35:30AM +0300, Boris Samorodov wrote: > >>> make[1]: /poudriere/jails/HEAD-aarch64/usr/src/Makefile.inc1 line 177: >

Re: should aarch64 cross-build work at amd64?

2016-09-23 Thread Boris Samorodov
24.09.2016 00:44, Boris Samorodov пишет: > 24.09.2016 00:39, Glen Barber пишет: >> On Sat, Sep 24, 2016 at 12:35:30AM +0300, Boris Samorodov wrote: >>> make[1]: /poudriere/jails/HEAD-aarch64/usr/src/Makefile.inc1 line 177: >>> In-tree binutils does not support the aarch64 architecture. Install the

Re: should aarch64 cross-build work at amd64?

2016-09-23 Thread Boris Samorodov
24.09.2016 00:39, Glen Barber пишет: > On Sat, Sep 24, 2016 at 12:35:30AM +0300, Boris Samorodov wrote: >> make[1]: /poudriere/jails/HEAD-aarch64/usr/src/Makefile.inc1 line 177: >> In-tree binutils does not support the aarch64 architecture. Install the >> aarch64-binutils port or package or set

Re: should aarch64 cross-build work at amd64?

2016-09-23 Thread Glen Barber
On Sat, Sep 24, 2016 at 12:35:30AM +0300, Boris Samorodov wrote: > make[1]: /poudriere/jails/HEAD-aarch64/usr/src/Makefile.inc1 line 177: > In-tree binutils does not support the aarch64 architecture. Install the > aarch64-binutils port or package or set CROSS_BINUTILS_PREFIX. These lines are

should aarch64 cross-build work at amd64?

2016-09-23 Thread Boris Samorodov
Hi All! I've just created an armv6 jail by poudriere at FreeBSD-current-amd64. It works fine: --- % poudriere jail -l JAILNAME VERSION ARCH METHOD TIMESTAMP PATH HEAD-armv6 12.0-CURRENT r306267 arm.armv6 svn+https2016-09-23 17:38:10 /poudriere/jails/HEAD-armv6 ---