sigset_t: a summary

1999-10-01 Thread Marcel Moolenaar
Ok, While in general the integration went well, a couple of issues have been raised. These are: 1. building with a -current source tree on -stable fails. This also means that we currently don't have the possibility to upgrade from -stable to -current. 2. Incompatibilities wrt to the

Re: sigset_t: a summary

1999-10-01 Thread Daniel Eischen
Marcel Moolenaar wrote: So, to start with issue 2: To start with the beginning: 1. Should the ucontext_t changes be backed out, or is this the way we would like to go? (but only it better :-) I think we want to keep the ucontext changes. SUSv2 requires them when SA_SIGINFO is set.

Re: sigset_t: a summary

1999-10-01 Thread Nate Williams
1. Should the ucontext_t changes be backed out, or is this the way we would like to go? (but only it better :-) We need something. Rather than say 'something better', I'd need to see what that better things is. However, given Bruce's comments earlier, it seems like we need to have

Re: sigset_t: a summary

1999-10-01 Thread Marcel Moolenaar
Nate Williams wrote: 1. Should the ucontext_t changes be backed out, or is this the way we would like to go? (but only it better :-) We need something. Rather than say 'something better', I'd need to see what that better things is. However, given Bruce's comments earlier, it seems