RE: sio problem in -current (COM1)

2003-04-02 Thread Bruce Evans
On Wed, 2 Apr 2003, Cagle, John (ISS-Houston) wrote: > Thanks! It was an ACPI-related problem. I disabled ACPI > (hint.acpi.0.disabled="1" in /boot/device.hints) and rebooted and now > both com ports show up properly as they did with FreeBSD 4.8. (These > are just standard com ports, btw.) We

RE: sio problem in -current (COM1)

2003-04-02 Thread Cagle, John (ISS-Houston)
port detection. That's weird. Thanks, John > -Original Message- > From: Bruce Evans [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Wednesday, April 02, 2003 9:17 PM > To: Cagle, John (ISS-Houston) > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: sio problem in -current (COM1) >

Re: sio problem in -current (COM1)

2003-04-02 Thread Bruce Evans
On Wed, 2 Apr 2003, Cagle, John (ISS-Houston) wrote: > I'm having a problem with -current on a ProLiant BL10e blade server. On > the blade server, we use a serial console on sio0/COM1. This works > perfectly with 4.8, but for some reason, the sio driver doesn't see COM1 > at all, and assigns COM

Re: sio problem in -current (COM1)

2003-04-02 Thread Terry Lambert
"Cagle, John (ISS-Houston)" wrote: > I'm having a problem with -current on a ProLiant BL10e blade server. On > the blade server, we use a serial console on sio0/COM1. This works > perfectly with 4.8, but for some reason, the sio driver doesn't see COM1 > at all, and assigns COM2 resources to sio0

sio problem in -current (COM1)

2003-04-02 Thread Cagle, John (ISS-Houston)
I'm having a problem with -current on a ProLiant BL10e blade server. On the blade server, we use a serial console on sio0/COM1. This works perfectly with 4.8, but for some reason, the sio driver doesn't see COM1 at all, and assigns COM2 resources to sio0. Any pointers to where I should look woul