Nuno Teixeira wrote:
I understand the basic concept of the folowing techs: softupdates, disk
write cache and ata tags.
My question is:
It is safe to use softupdates + write cache + ata tags (IBM disk)?
I read someware that it not safe to use softupdate + write cache
(without
Hi,
Write cacheing is automatically enabled if tagged queueing is enabled
and supported by the disk, so I doubt you're seeing any improvement at
all.
I must admit: My statements are based on experience with SCSI Tagged Queuing
and SCSI Write Cache. I hope I'm correct if I assume that the
Matthias Schuendehuette [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I consider it unnecessary to use WriteCache if TaggedQueuing is enabled
and working.
(The performace gain of WriteCache and TaggedQueuing is more or less the
same, the combination of both adds less than 10% of performance and you
shouldn't
Hello to all,
I understand the basic concept of the folowing techs: softupdates, disk
write cache and ata tags.
My question is:
It is safe to use softupdates + write cache + ata tags (IBM disk)?
I read someware that it not safe to use softupdate + write cache
(without ata tags) and if
Hi,
Is it safe to use softupdates + write cache + ata tags (IBM disk)?
The summary of *my* experience and knowledge is:
It is considered *unsave* to use Soft Updates with WriteCache enabled.
I consider it unnecessary to use WriteCache if TaggedQueuing is enabled
and working.
(The performace
