Re: sound and sio problems after newbus changes

1999-05-01 Thread Blaz Zupan
On Sun, 2 May 1999, Bruce Evans wrote: > Fast interrupts were broken in early versions of new-bus. Without > fast interrupts, sio interrupt latency is limited by the worst spl > hog in the system. Yes I know that, but I believe this was later fixed. I'm running a kernel compiled today and the sio

Re: sound and sio problems after newbus changes

1999-05-01 Thread Bruce Evans
>Also, has anybody problems with sio buffer overflows? My machine is a >Pentium 200MMX, which should be able to handle 115.2K on a com port just >fine (my old 486 did, when I was running 2.2.x, 3.0 and 4.0 before >newbus). But now I'm receiving lots of sio overflows, it is as simple as >typing "ATI

Re: sound and sio problems after newbus changes

1999-05-01 Thread Kris Kennaway
Yes and yes (I have both the sound problems and the sio overflows) - these started around the time of the newbus commits. Kris On Sat, 1 May 1999, Blaz Zupan wrote: > I also experience the sound problems. Although sound works, it has > problems stopping. For example when I hit stop in x11amp, th

sound and sio problems after newbus changes

1999-05-01 Thread Blaz Zupan
I also experience the sound problems. Although sound works, it has problems stopping. For example when I hit stop in x11amp, the sound still loops for a couple of seconds and then I get the following message on the console: timeout flushing dbuf_out, chan 1 cnt 0xfff9e46c flags 0x01c1 This me