On Sun, 5 Jan 2003, Nate Lawson wrote:
> On Mon, 6 Jan 2003, Bruce Evans wrote:
> > - spec_print() is of low quality: it doesn't print the device name or number.
> > - devfs_print() would be reachable but doesn't exist, so vprint() prints
> > even lower quality output for devfs since there nothi
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Bruce Evans writes:
>No. Also no INVARIANTS and the like. A profiling kernel (with profiling
>not running) seemed to panic faster.
Ok, in this case listening to KASSERTS would probably have helped you.
Please try 1.351 of vfs_bio.c
--
Poul-Henning Kamp |
On Mon, 6 Jan 2003, Bruce Evans wrote:
> - spec_print() is of low quality: it doesn't print the device name or number.
> - devfs_print() would be reachable but doesn't exist, so vprint() prints
> even lower quality output for devfs since there nothing prints an inode
> number either.
I was the
On Sun, 5 Jan 2003 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Bruce Evans writes:
> >On Sun, 5 Jan 2003 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >> This is not tested with DEVFS I take it ?
> >
> >It doesn't affect devfs because devfs doesn't go through ufs. It goes
> >straight to the default v
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Bruce Evans writes:
>On Sun, 5 Jan 2003 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
>> I always wondered why specfs would insist on no locking, but I never
>> had much ambition for finding out.
>
>Me too. It seems to be mostly a mistake.
>
>> >Fixing specfs is simple:
>>
>> This is
On Sun, 5 Jan 2003 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Bruce Evans writes:
>
> >The following change uncovers bugs in specfs locking and other places:
>
> Wow, that was fun! :-/
It took a while, yes %-).
> I always wondered why specfs would insist on no locking, but I nev
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Bruce Evans writes:
>The following change uncovers bugs in specfs locking and other places:
Wow, that was fun! :-/
I always wondered why specfs would insist on no locking, but I never
had much ambition for finding out.
>Fixing specfs is simple:
This is not test
The following change uncovers bugs in specfs locking and other places:
% RCS file: /home/ncvs/src/sys/ufs/ufs/ufs_vnops.c,v
% Working file: ufs_vnops.c
% head: 1.222
% ...
%
% revision 1.221
% date: 2003/01/04 08:47:19; author: phk; state: Exp; lines: +0 -9
% Since
