Re: sscanf(3) is broken in 5-CURRENT [SIGBUS]

2001-06-03 Thread Maxim Sobolev
On Sun, 3 Jun 2001 18:29:52 -0400 (EDT), Daniel Eischen wrote: > On Mon, 4 Jun 2001, Bruce Evans wrote: > > On Sat, 2 Jun 2001, Maxim Sobolev wrote: > > > > > It seems that something is wrong with sscanf(3) in -current - in > > > some cases it may cause SIGBUS. I failed to reproduce the > > > pro

Re: sscanf(3) is broken in 5-CURRENT [SIGBUS]

2001-06-03 Thread Daniel Eischen
On Mon, 4 Jun 2001, Bruce Evans wrote: > On Sat, 2 Jun 2001, Maxim Sobolev wrote: > > > It seems that something is wrong with sscanf(3) in -current - in > > some cases it may cause SIGBUS. I failed to reproduce the > > problem on 4-STABLE, so it is a -current specific bug. Attached > > please fin

Re: sscanf(3) is broken in 5-CURRENT [SIGBUS]

2001-06-03 Thread Bruce Evans
On Sat, 2 Jun 2001, Maxim Sobolev wrote: > It seems that something is wrong with sscanf(3) in -current - in > some cases it may cause SIGBUS. I failed to reproduce the > problem on 4-STABLE, so it is a -current specific bug. Attached > please find small showcase that exposes the bug in question >

sscanf(3) is broken in 5-CURRENT [SIGBUS]

2001-06-02 Thread Maxim Sobolev
Hi, It seems that something is wrong with sscanf(3) in -current - in some cases it may cause SIGBUS. I failed to reproduce the problem on 4-STABLE, so it is a -current specific bug. Attached please find small showcase that exposes the bug in question and a backtrace after SIGBUS. Please fix. -M