Re: svn && ports, or the hen && egg

2013-12-19 Thread Thomas Mueller
I had (still have) svn on a USB-stick installation of FreeBSD 9.2-STABLE. So I tried to use that to checkout the src tree for FreeBSD-HEAD; re(4) recognized my on-motherboard (MSI Z77 MPOWER) Ethernet but couldn't connect. So, after NetBSD 6.1_STABLE hung consistently on boot, NetBSD-current amd

Re: svn && ports, or the hen && egg

2013-12-19 Thread Shane Ambler
On 19/12/2013 08:04, Freddie Cash wrote: > On Wed, Dec 18, 2013 at 1:09 PM, Matthias Apitz wrote: >> Ok, thanks; but see this: >> >> $ uname -a >> FreeBSD tiny-r255948 10.0-ALPHA4 FreeBSD 10.0-ALPHA4 #1: Fri Oct 18 >> 12:10:57 CEST 2013 g...@aurora.sisis.de:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC/i386 >> $

Re: svn && ports, or the hen && egg

2013-12-18 Thread olli hauer
On 2013-12-18 22:09, Matthias Apitz wrote: > El día Wednesday, December 18, 2013 a las 12:59:16PM -0800, Freddie Cash > escribió: > >> On Wed, Dec 18, 2013 at 12:50 PM, Matthias Apitz wrote: >> >>> As ports are now for some time are to be pulled out via SVN (and not >>> CVS) and the svn client i

Re: svn && ports, or the hen && egg

2013-12-18 Thread Freddie Cash
On Wed, Dec 18, 2013 at 1:09 PM, Matthias Apitz wrote: > El día Wednesday, December 18, 2013 a las 12:59:16PM -0800, Freddie Cash > escribió: > > > On Wed, Dec 18, 2013 at 12:50 PM, Matthias Apitz > wrote: > > > > > As ports are now for some time are to be pulled out via SVN (and not > > > CVS)

Re: svn && ports, or the hen && egg

2013-12-18 Thread Matthias Apitz
El día Wednesday, December 18, 2013 a las 12:59:16PM -0800, Freddie Cash escribió: > On Wed, Dec 18, 2013 at 12:50 PM, Matthias Apitz wrote: > > > As ports are now for some time are to be pulled out via SVN (and not > > CVS) and the svn client is only in the ports tree and not in the base > > s

Re: svn && ports, or the hen && egg

2013-12-18 Thread Baptiste Daroussin
On Wed, Dec 18, 2013 at 09:50:27PM +0100, Matthias Apitz wrote: > > Hi, > > As ports are now for some time are to be pulled out via SVN (and not > CVS) and the svn client is only in the ports tree and not in the base > system, how is this thought to work in a clean way, without dusting the > syst

Re: svn && ports, or the hen && egg

2013-12-18 Thread Dimitry Andric
On 18 Dec 2013, at 21:50, Matthias Apitz wrote: > > As ports are now for some time are to be pulled out via SVN (and not > CVS) and the svn client is only in the ports tree and not in the base > system, how is this thought to work in a clean way, without dusting the > system before with some bina

Re: svn && ports, or the hen && egg

2013-12-18 Thread Freddie Cash
On Wed, Dec 18, 2013 at 12:50 PM, Matthias Apitz wrote: > As ports are now for some time are to be pulled out via SVN (and not > CVS) and the svn client is only in the ports tree and not in the base > system, how is this thought to work in a clean way, without dusting the > system before with som

Re: svn && ports, or the hen && egg

2013-12-18 Thread Nathan Whitehorn
On 12/18/13 14:50, Matthias Apitz wrote: Hi, As ports are now for some time are to be pulled out via SVN (and not CVS) and the svn client is only in the ports tree and not in the base system, how is this thought to work in a clean way, without dusting the system before with some binary packages,

svn && ports, or the hen && egg

2013-12-18 Thread Matthias Apitz
Hi, As ports are now for some time are to be pulled out via SVN (and not CVS) and the svn client is only in the ports tree and not in the base system, how is this thought to work in a clean way, without dusting the system before with some binary packages, only based on base system and sources? T