On 2024-03-19 16:02, Emmanuel Vadot wrote:
> On Tue, 19 Mar 2024 07:55:15 +
> Alastair Hogge wrote:
>
>> On 2024-03-19 15:23, Emmanuel Vadot wrote:
>> > Hi,
>>
>> Hey Emmanuel,
>>
>> > On Tue, 19 Mar 2024 06:54:27 +
>> > Alastair Hogge wrote:
>> >
>> >> Hello,
>> >>
>> >> Recently a
On Tue, 19 Mar 2024 07:55:15 +
Alastair Hogge wrote:
> On 2024-03-19 15:23, Emmanuel Vadot wrote:
> > Hi,
>
> Hey Emmanuel,
>
> > On Tue, 19 Mar 2024 06:54:27 +
> > Alastair Hogge wrote:
> >
> >> Hello,
> >>
> >> Recently a similar module (PAM) mentioned in the subject was committed
On 2024-03-19 15:23, Emmanuel Vadot wrote:
> Hi,
Hey Emmanuel,
> On Tue, 19 Mar 2024 06:54:27 +
> Alastair Hogge wrote:
>
>> Hello,
>>
>> Recently a similar module (PAM) mentioned in the subject was committed
>> to base[1]. The module in base masks the currently installed Port, the
>> man
Hi,
On Tue, 19 Mar 2024 06:54:27 +
Alastair Hogge wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Recently a similar module (PAM) mentioned in the subject was committed
> to base[1]. The module in base masks the currently installed Port, the
> man page can be accessed with man -M /usr/local/share/man 8 pam_xdg,
>
Hello,
Recently a similar module (PAM) mentioned in the subject was committed
to base[1]. The module in base masks the currently installed Port, the
man page can be accessed with man -M /usr/local/share/man 8 pam_xdg,
however, I can now no longer build the Port. I noticed that the base
module has
