Archie Cobbs writes:
> I have this patch for traceroute that adds the ability to send
> packets with an arbitrary IP protocol number, instead of just TCP
> and UDP. This is mainly useful to see if some router between points
> A and B is blocking packets based on IP protocol number.
>
> I sent it t
On Mon, 3 May 1999, Archie Cobbs wrote:
> Johan Granlund writes:
> > How is it going with netgraph?
> > I have looked at the -net archives on and off and it's very quit.
> > Is it still going to be committed?
>
> Netgraph is doing well.. several people have tried it and/or are using it.
> One g
Johan Granlund writes:
> How is it going with netgraph?
> I have looked at the -net archives on and off and it's very quit.
> Is it still going to be committed?
Netgraph is doing well.. several people have tried it and/or are using it.
One guy in Finland has reimplemented the whole concept in Java
On Mon, 3 May 1999, Archie Cobbs wrote:
> I have this patch for traceroute that adds the ability to send
[snip]
How is it going with netgraph?
I have looked at the -net archives on and off and it's very quit.
Is it still going to be committed?
/Johan
>
> -Archie
>
> _
I have this patch for traceroute that adds the ability to send
packets with an arbitrary IP protocol number, instead of just TCP
and UDP. This is mainly useful to see if some router between points
A and B is blocking packets based on IP protocol number.
I sent it to "tracero...@ee.lbl.gov" but got