On Wed, Jun 27, 2001 at 06:40:53PM +1000, Bruce Evans wrote:
> On Wed, 27 Jun 2001, Ruslan Ermilov wrote:
>
> > On Tue, Jun 26, 2001 at 11:18:56AM -0400, Robert Watson wrote:
> > > ...
> > > off. I'm generally fairly positive about this change, but would be
> > > interested in hearing Bruce's th
On Wed, 27 Jun 2001, Ruslan Ermilov wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 26, 2001 at 11:18:56AM -0400, Robert Watson wrote:
> > ...
> > off. I'm generally fairly positive about this change, but would be
> > interested in hearing Bruce's thoughts on any compatibility issues, in
> > particular, with respects to t
groups(3) to set the effective group ID.
> > Date: Fri, 22 Jun 2001 18:05:09 +0300
> > From: Ruslan Ermilov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Subject: ucred.cr_gid
> > Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Mail-Fol
mplifies our credential code,
and improves compatibility.
> Date: Fri, 22 Jun 2001 18:05:09 +0300
> From: Ruslan Ermilov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: ucred.cr_gid
> Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Mail-Followup-To: [EMAIL
Could someone please take a look at it before I commit this?
- Forwarded message from Ruslan Ermilov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -
Date: Fri, 22 Jun 2001 18:05:09 +0300
From: Ruslan Ermilov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: ucred.cr_gid
Message
Hi!
The attached patch replaces ucred.cr_groups[0] with ucred.cr_gid.
This is mostly needed for POSIX alignment. setegid(2) etc. should
not change supplementary groups set.
Also, type of 's group.gr_gid changed to a more natural
gid_t (also as in POSIX).
getgrouplist(3)'s and initg
