On Wed, May 30, 2012 at 12:00:08PM -0400, John Baldwin wrote:
On Tuesday, May 29, 2012 7:17:01 pm Anton Shterenlikht wrote:
On Mon, May 21, 2012 at 01:08:24PM -0400, John Baldwin wrote:
On Monday, May 21, 2012 5:45:19 am Anton Shterenlikht wrote:
On Mon, May 21, 2012 at 09:42:17AM +0100,
On Tuesday, May 29, 2012 7:17:01 pm Anton Shterenlikht wrote:
On Mon, May 21, 2012 at 01:08:24PM -0400, John Baldwin wrote:
On Monday, May 21, 2012 5:45:19 am Anton Shterenlikht wrote:
On Mon, May 21, 2012 at 09:42:17AM +0100, Anton Shterenlikht wrote:
On Sun, May 20, 2012 at 09:54:51AM
On Mon, May 21, 2012 at 01:08:24PM -0400, John Baldwin wrote:
On Monday, May 21, 2012 5:45:19 am Anton Shterenlikht wrote:
On Mon, May 21, 2012 at 09:42:17AM +0100, Anton Shterenlikht wrote:
On Sun, May 20, 2012 at 09:54:51AM +0100, Anton Shterenlikht wrote:
On Fri, May 18, 2012 at
On Wed, May 30, 2012 at 12:17:01AM +0100, Anton Shterenlikht wrote:
I might have misled you on this,
Yes, sorry, looking at the dmesg I sent you,
I obviously booted the patched kernel.
So, no, 'hw.pci.enable_io_modes=0' in /boot/loader.conf
doesn't help to boot an
On Sun, May 20, 2012 at 09:54:51AM +0100, Anton Shterenlikht wrote:
On Fri, May 18, 2012 at 10:48:52AM -0400, John Baldwin wrote:
On Wednesday, May 16, 2012 11:30:19 am Anton Shterenlikht wrote:
er.. yes, of course it helped.
My problem was that I couldn't boot.
So, I presumed the
On Mon, May 21, 2012 at 09:42:17AM +0100, Anton Shterenlikht wrote:
On Sun, May 20, 2012 at 09:54:51AM +0100, Anton Shterenlikht wrote:
On Fri, May 18, 2012 at 10:48:52AM -0400, John Baldwin wrote:
On Wednesday, May 16, 2012 11:30:19 am Anton Shterenlikht wrote:
er.. yes, of course it
On Monday, May 21, 2012 5:45:19 am Anton Shterenlikht wrote:
On Mon, May 21, 2012 at 09:42:17AM +0100, Anton Shterenlikht wrote:
On Sun, May 20, 2012 at 09:54:51AM +0100, Anton Shterenlikht wrote:
On Fri, May 18, 2012 at 10:48:52AM -0400, John Baldwin wrote:
On Wednesday, May 16, 2012
On Wednesday, May 16, 2012 11:30:19 am Anton Shterenlikht wrote:
er.. yes, of course it helped.
My problem was that I couldn't boot.
So, I presumed the very existence of dmesg.boot
showed that your patches (both of them) work fine.
But, sorry, I could've been more explicit.
All seems to
On Wednesday, May 16, 2012 4:45:51 am Anton Shterenlikht wrote:
On Tue, May 15, 2012 at 12:11:09PM -0400, John Baldwin wrote:
On Monday, May 07, 2012 5:25:02 pm Anton Shterenlikht wrote:
On Mon, May 07, 2012 at 10:39:51AM -0400, John Baldwin wrote:
On Friday, May 04, 2012 4:07:24 pm
On Wed, May 16, 2012 at 11:08:05AM -0400, John Baldwin wrote:
On Wednesday, May 16, 2012 4:45:51 am Anton Shterenlikht wrote:
On Tue, May 15, 2012 at 12:11:09PM -0400, John Baldwin wrote:
On Monday, May 07, 2012 5:25:02 pm Anton Shterenlikht wrote:
On Mon, May 07, 2012 at 10:39:51AM
On Monday, May 07, 2012 5:25:02 pm Anton Shterenlikht wrote:
On Mon, May 07, 2012 at 10:39:51AM -0400, John Baldwin wrote:
On Friday, May 04, 2012 4:07:24 pm Anton Shterenlikht wrote:
On Fri, May 04, 2012 at 11:07:59AM -0400, John Baldwin wrote:
On Friday, May 04, 2012 7:51:33 am Anton
On Friday, May 04, 2012 4:07:24 pm Anton Shterenlikht wrote:
On Fri, May 04, 2012 at 11:07:59AM -0400, John Baldwin wrote:
On Friday, May 04, 2012 7:51:33 am Anton Shterenlikht wrote:
On Thu, May 03, 2012 at 02:46:18PM -0400, John Baldwin wrote:
On Thursday, May 03, 2012 11:35:19 am
On Mon, May 07, 2012 at 10:39:51AM -0400, John Baldwin wrote:
On Friday, May 04, 2012 4:07:24 pm Anton Shterenlikht wrote:
On Fri, May 04, 2012 at 11:07:59AM -0400, John Baldwin wrote:
On Friday, May 04, 2012 7:51:33 am Anton Shterenlikht wrote:
On Thu, May 03, 2012 at 02:46:18PM -0400,
On Thu, May 03, 2012 at 02:46:18PM -0400, John Baldwin wrote:
On Thursday, May 03, 2012 11:35:19 am Anton Shterenlikht wrote:
On Tue, May 01, 2012 at 12:35:26PM +0100, Anton Shterenlikht wrote:
On Mon, Apr 30, 2012 at 08:43:14AM -0400, John Baldwin wrote:
I also see:
On Friday, May 04, 2012 7:51:33 am Anton Shterenlikht wrote:
On Thu, May 03, 2012 at 02:46:18PM -0400, John Baldwin wrote:
On Thursday, May 03, 2012 11:35:19 am Anton Shterenlikht wrote:
On Tue, May 01, 2012 at 12:35:26PM +0100, Anton Shterenlikht wrote:
On Mon, Apr 30, 2012 at
On Fri, May 04, 2012 at 11:07:59AM -0400, John Baldwin wrote:
On Friday, May 04, 2012 7:51:33 am Anton Shterenlikht wrote:
On Thu, May 03, 2012 at 02:46:18PM -0400, John Baldwin wrote:
On Thursday, May 03, 2012 11:35:19 am Anton Shterenlikht wrote:
On Tue, May 01, 2012 at 12:35:26PM
On Thursday, May 03, 2012 11:35:19 am Anton Shterenlikht wrote:
On Tue, May 01, 2012 at 12:35:26PM +0100, Anton Shterenlikht wrote:
On Mon, Apr 30, 2012 at 08:43:14AM -0400, John Baldwin wrote:
I also see:
ata0: stat0=0x00 err=0x01 lsb=0x14 msb=0exb
ata0: stat1=0x00
On Saturday, April 28, 2012 1:20:22 pm Anton Shterenlikht wrote:
On Fri, Apr 27, 2012 at 07:51:11AM -0400, John Baldwin wrote:
On Thursday, April 26, 2012 6:42:15 pm Anton Shterenlikht wrote:
I was updating from r231158 to 234465
(amd64 laptop Compaq 6715s),
and I think I must've
On Fri, Apr 27, 2012 at 07:51:11AM -0400, John Baldwin wrote:
On Thursday, April 26, 2012 6:42:15 pm Anton Shterenlikht wrote:
I was updating from r231158 to 234465
(amd64 laptop Compaq 6715s),
and I think I must've messed someting
up in the kernel config. Now I get
build error, panic
On Thursday, April 26, 2012 6:42:15 pm Anton Shterenlikht wrote:
I was updating from r231158 to 234465
(amd64 laptop Compaq 6715s),
and I think I must've messed someting
up in the kernel config. Now I get
build error, panic of a loader error,
depending on which kernel I build.
I was updating from r231158 to 234465
(amd64 laptop Compaq 6715s),
and I think I must've messed someting
up in the kernel config. Now I get
build error, panic of a loader error,
depending on which kernel I build.
*
If I build GENERIC, I
21 matches
Mail list logo
