This patch makes usbd track a dynamic number of devices using a list
instead of the static array of 4 devices. It's implemented as a list
but it's very easy to change.
--
Adam Migus - Research Scientist
Network Associates Laboratories (http://www.nailabs.com)
TrustedBSD
On Thu, 13 Feb 2003, Adam Migus wrote:
:This patch makes usbd track a dynamic number of devices using a list
:instead of the static array of 4 devices. It's implemented as a list
:but it's very easy to change.
Does this list want a lock to protect it? I am unfamiliar with usb
locking at the
Me too, so if it does require one someone please tell me. I obviously
read the code and from my understanding no locking is fine but I
could be wrong.
On Thu, Feb 13, 2003 at 11:13:31AM -0500, Andrew R. Reiter wrote:
On Thu, 13 Feb 2003, Adam Migus wrote:
:This patch makes usbd track a
On Thu, 13 Feb 2003 11:13:31 -0500 (EST)
Andrew R. Reiter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, 13 Feb 2003, Adam Migus wrote:
:This patch makes usbd track a dynamic number of devices using a list
:instead of the static array of 4 devices. It's implemented as a list
:but it's very easy to
On Thu, Feb 13, 2003 at 11:02:29AM -0500, Adam Migus wrote:
This patch makes usbd track a dynamic number of devices using a list
instead of the static array of 4 devices. It's implemented as a list
but it's very easy to change.
Thanks, although I'm not clear as to the future of usbd. With
Joe,
funny you should mention. I actually tried posting this patch three
times. The first two times I actually said in the (more elaborate)
explanation of the patch that I as well am moving toward devd.
So, I see your point and it's why I didn't bother spending more than
30 minutes doing this
