On Thu, Feb 06, 2003 at 10:53:08AM -0800, Julian Elischer wrote the words in effect of:
On Thu, 6 Feb 2003, John Baldwin wrote:
On 05-Feb-2003 Julian Elischer wrote:
Is there ever a case when a vnode is locked for longer than the duration
of the syscall that locked it?
On Fri, 7 Feb 2003, Hiten Pandya wrote:
On Thu, Feb 06, 2003 at 10:53:08AM -0800, Julian Elischer wrote the words in effect
of:
On Thu, 6 Feb 2003, John Baldwin wrote:
On 05-Feb-2003 Julian Elischer wrote:
Is there ever a case when a vnode is locked for longer than
On 05-Feb-2003 Julian Elischer wrote:
Is there ever a case when a vnode is locked for longer than the duration
of the syscall that locked it?
Shouldn't be. That would be a bug I believe. Userland threads should
never hold any kernel locks.
--
John Baldwin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Thu, 6 Feb 2003, John Baldwin wrote:
On 05-Feb-2003 Julian Elischer wrote:
Is there ever a case when a vnode is locked for longer than the duration
of the syscall that locked it?
Shouldn't be. That would be a bug I believe. Userland threads should
never hold any kernel locks.
Is there ever a case when a vnode is locked for longer than the duration
of the syscall that locked it?
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with unsubscribe freebsd-current in the body of the message
