I still havn't yet got my wireless lan working after upgrade to 5.0-current
I applied a wi timeout patch of yesterday but the kernel message
is still there (tx failed).
I disabled all firewalling for the moment to have nothing in the way
that might occlude the problem.
The control lights at
On Sat, Mar 01, 2003 at 12:03:12PM +0100, Christoph Kukulies wrote:
I still havn't yet got my wireless lan working after upgrade to 5.0-current
I applied a wi timeout patch of yesterday but the kernel message
is still there (tx failed).
The patch is unrelated to the tx failed message.
On
In message: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Marcel Moolenaar [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
: status: no carrier
: ssid 1:
:
: Did you do `wicontrol -i wi0 -p 1'?
I've found that the new driver really really really hates the old
wicontrol interface when the commands are also present in the ifconfig
On Sat, Mar 01, 2003 at 03:18:49AM -0800, Marcel Moolenaar wrote:
On Sat, Mar 01, 2003 at 12:03:12PM +0100, Christoph Kukulies wrote:
I still havn't yet got my wireless lan working after upgrade to 5.0-current
I applied a wi timeout patch of yesterday but the kernel message
is still
On Sat, Mar 01, 2003 at 06:08:27AM -0700, M. Warner Losh wrote:
In message: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Marcel Moolenaar [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
: status: no carrier
: ssid 1:
:
: Did you do `wicontrol -i wi0 -p 1'?
As already said, I did that and the wicontrol output between the
In message: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Christoph P. Kukulies [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
: Warner, I applied the patch and no change.
marcel's patch, or my patch?
: How does one specify the commands in the ifconfig interface?
: This is what I used to invoke from /etc/rc.local:
:
:
On Sat, Mar 01, 2003 at 11:35:37AM -0700, M. Warner Losh wrote:
Not sure whether I group replied, so maybe you will be
receiving two similar sounding answers, Warner.
In message: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Christoph P. Kukulies [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
: Warner, I applied the patch and no
On Sat, Mar 01, 2003 at 08:08:36PM +0100, Christoph P. Kukulies wrote:
On Sat, Mar 01, 2003 at 11:35:37AM -0700, M. Warner Losh wrote:
It works!
Packets started flowing right after I typed in the above line.
and
ifconfig wi0 192.168.254.2 netmask 255.255.255.0 ssid kuku
On Sat, Mar 01, 2003 at 06:08:27AM -0700, M. Warner Losh wrote:
In message: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Marcel Moolenaar [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
: status: no carrier
: ssid 1:
:
: Did you do `wicontrol -i wi0 -p 1'?
I've found that the new driver really really really hates the old
In message: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Marcel Moolenaar [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
: BTW: Shouldn't we obsolete wicontrol then or strip functionality?
: It appears we have 2 ways in which we can do things now...
I'm planning on doing that soonish. However, I think that hacking wi
to make it
On Sat, Mar 01, 2003 at 12:23:22PM -0700, M. Warner Losh wrote:
In message: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Marcel Moolenaar [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
: BTW: Shouldn't we obsolete wicontrol then or strip functionality?
: It appears we have 2 ways in which we can do things now...
I'm planning
11 matches
Mail list logo