wi0 - need help

2003-03-01 Thread Christoph Kukulies
I still havn't yet got my wireless lan working after upgrade to 5.0-current I applied a wi timeout patch of yesterday but the kernel message is still there (tx failed). I disabled all firewalling for the moment to have nothing in the way that might occlude the problem. The control lights at

Re: wi0 - need help

2003-03-01 Thread Marcel Moolenaar
On Sat, Mar 01, 2003 at 12:03:12PM +0100, Christoph Kukulies wrote: I still havn't yet got my wireless lan working after upgrade to 5.0-current I applied a wi timeout patch of yesterday but the kernel message is still there (tx failed). The patch is unrelated to the tx failed message. On

Re: wi0 - need help

2003-03-01 Thread M. Warner Losh
In message: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Marcel Moolenaar [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: : status: no carrier : ssid 1: : : Did you do `wicontrol -i wi0 -p 1'? I've found that the new driver really really really hates the old wicontrol interface when the commands are also present in the ifconfig

Re: wi0 - need help

2003-03-01 Thread Christoph P. Kukulies
On Sat, Mar 01, 2003 at 03:18:49AM -0800, Marcel Moolenaar wrote: On Sat, Mar 01, 2003 at 12:03:12PM +0100, Christoph Kukulies wrote: I still havn't yet got my wireless lan working after upgrade to 5.0-current I applied a wi timeout patch of yesterday but the kernel message is still

Re: wi0 - need help

2003-03-01 Thread Christoph P. Kukulies
On Sat, Mar 01, 2003 at 06:08:27AM -0700, M. Warner Losh wrote: In message: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Marcel Moolenaar [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: : status: no carrier : ssid 1: : : Did you do `wicontrol -i wi0 -p 1'? As already said, I did that and the wicontrol output between the

Re: wi0 - need help

2003-03-01 Thread M. Warner Losh
In message: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Christoph P. Kukulies [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: : Warner, I applied the patch and no change. marcel's patch, or my patch? : How does one specify the commands in the ifconfig interface? : This is what I used to invoke from /etc/rc.local: : :

Re: wi0 - need help

2003-03-01 Thread Christoph P. Kukulies
On Sat, Mar 01, 2003 at 11:35:37AM -0700, M. Warner Losh wrote: Not sure whether I group replied, so maybe you will be receiving two similar sounding answers, Warner. In message: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Christoph P. Kukulies [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: : Warner, I applied the patch and no

Re: wi0 - need help

2003-03-01 Thread Wilko Bulte
On Sat, Mar 01, 2003 at 08:08:36PM +0100, Christoph P. Kukulies wrote: On Sat, Mar 01, 2003 at 11:35:37AM -0700, M. Warner Losh wrote: It works! Packets started flowing right after I typed in the above line. and ifconfig wi0 192.168.254.2 netmask 255.255.255.0 ssid kuku

Re: wi0 - need help

2003-03-01 Thread Marcel Moolenaar
On Sat, Mar 01, 2003 at 06:08:27AM -0700, M. Warner Losh wrote: In message: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Marcel Moolenaar [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: : status: no carrier : ssid 1: : : Did you do `wicontrol -i wi0 -p 1'? I've found that the new driver really really really hates the old

Re: wi0 - need help

2003-03-01 Thread M. Warner Losh
In message: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Marcel Moolenaar [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: : BTW: Shouldn't we obsolete wicontrol then or strip functionality? : It appears we have 2 ways in which we can do things now... I'm planning on doing that soonish. However, I think that hacking wi to make it

Re: wi0 - need help

2003-03-01 Thread Marcel Moolenaar
On Sat, Mar 01, 2003 at 12:23:22PM -0700, M. Warner Losh wrote: In message: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Marcel Moolenaar [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: : BTW: Shouldn't we obsolete wicontrol then or strip functionality? : It appears we have 2 ways in which we can do things now... I'm planning