I am currently running FreeBSD 2.1.5, and would like to upgrade to 3.1
without losing the tremendous amounts of data on my drive (backups are
unfortunately not an option).
I have seen several posts containing advice for accomplishing this task
by altering sysinstall options, but this seems
ÓÒ , 30 ÉÀÎ 1999, Thomas Dean ÎÁÐÉÓÁÌ:
I installed -current on a notebook with WINNT on the disk. The
notebook has the ide disk limitation. So, I chopped the disk do get
around it. Maybe I should buy a new notebook, but, this one works.
Everything worked OK, except the boot manager. I
On Wed, 30 Jun 1999 00:41:54 MST, Doug wrote:
This is a situation in which we can't make _everyone_ happy. For the
particular case you've provided, anyone who upgrades from 2.2 to 3.3
without reading the release notes will get what's coming to him.
That's always true, but
This is a bit of a tangent from the original post, but when did the FreeBSD
kernel start supporting ELF natively (not talking about Linux emulation).
I made the mistake of attempting to run a 3.0 ELF world with a 2.2.5 kernel,
and it worked (mostly). I was unaware that anything that "old"
Hello,
Here is a 'little' problem with vm_zone structure and field
'zname' in it.
zinit() function takes a pointer to name of zone and assigns it to
field zname. Since nfs module defines this name in the static module
memory pointer to name becomes invalid when module
So far I've run the latest buffer cache related fixes overnight on my
SMP test box without any problems.
Is anyone still experiencing buffer-cache related problems with CURRENT?
-Matt
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
George Michaelson wrote:
Q. These symbolic links are a pain. Why don't you just edit
"src/sys/conf/files" appropriately?
A. The license terms for soft-updates do not permit that. See the
FreeBSD mailing list archives (the FreeBSD-current list, probably) for
more details.
George Michaelson wrote:
The discussion(s) took place on [EMAIL PROTECTED]
The search string in the archives which works is:
kirk AND soft-update AND integration
note the soft-update, not softupdates.
Thanks! I couldn't remember for sure where the discussion had been.
John
