Hi,
the change in src/sys/i386/include/ucontext.h (in struct __mcontext),
where "struct trapframe mc_tf;" was replaced by it's members
broke doscmd.
(The relevant files are
$FreeBSD: src/sys/i386/include/ucontext.h,v 1.3 1999/10/07 12:40:34 marcel Exp $
$FreeBSD:
The Hermit Hacker wrote:
Just to confirm, *technically*, I should just have to comment out the
options PROCFS in my kernel config, rebuild and reboot and since procfs
isn't in the kernel, it will look for it as a module?
As long as the module is up to date.
--
Daniel C. Sobral
Philipp Mergenthaler wrote:
the change in src/sys/i386/include/ucontext.h (in struct __mcontext),
where "struct trapframe mc_tf;" was replaced by it's members
broke doscmd.
Fixed. Thanks,
--
Marcel Moolenaarmailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
SCC Internetworking Databases
At 3:21 PM -0700 1999/10/7, David O'Brien wrote:
HP and SGI workstations have a single huge /. Why do you
need /usr seperate from / when you aren't diskless (or /usr'less)?
If you've done your job right, it can be mounted read-only. This
makes it harder for someone to
Another thing was
syslogd was looking for /var/log/security and can't find it, how can i fix
this?
Just touch /var/log/security
syslogd can't/doesn't _create_ files, just _append_ to existing ones.
Leif
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in
If you've done your job right, it can be mounted read-only. This
makes it harder for someone to break into the machine and obtain root
access, because now they have to be root to unmount /usr and remount
it read-write, so that they can put their trojan script on there that
they're
On Thu, Oct 07, 1999 at 03:15:03PM -0700, David Schwartz wrote:
There should be fairly few writes to the root partition, so having
An opionion. I use the HP workstation model where my / is 1800M. I have
You are not disagreeing with him, David. You are just talking about
On Thu, Oct 07, 1999 at 03:15:03PM -0700, David Schwartz wrote:
There should be fairly few writes to the root partition, so having
An opionion. I use the HP workstation model where my / is
1800M. I have
You are not disagreeing with him, David. You are just talking about
On Thu, Oct 07, 1999 at 10:09:23AM -0700, Matthew Dillon wrote:
Intel's ECC implementation is not perfect (1), but it's good enough to
catch these sorts of problems.
Just as an interesting side note, we had a motherboard which
supported ECC ram and had ECC ram in it and which was
On Thu, Oct 07, 1999 at 10:09:23AM -0700, Matthew Dillon wrote:
Intel's ECC implementation is not perfect (1), but it's good enough to
catch these sorts of problems.
Just as an interesting side note, we had a motherboard which
supported ECC ram and had ECC ram in it and which
On Thu, Oct 07, 1999 at 10:09:23AM -0700, Matthew Dillon wrote:
Intel's ECC implementation is not perfect (1), but it's good enough to
catch these sorts of problems.
Just as an interesting side note, we had a motherboard which
supported ECC ram and had ECC ram in it and which was
Phil 0. Nature wrote:
Has anyone else experienced problems with identd not working?
Uh, you'd probably have to be more specific. What identd (pidentd
from ports, or something else). What version. In what way doesn't it
work. What error messages are being logged. What version of FreeBSD.
We're talking about the special case of small root partitions, such that
softupdates inability to make empty space available quickly can make the
difference between a major operation's success or failure.
This is almost impossible on a 1.8Gb root partition.
Again why? What's
IT seems that a recent change to the linux emulation code has caused q3 to
have problems, whenever I try to go to an internet game, I get a message
on the console:
usage: ping [server]
doing this operation worked fine yesterday.
Kenneth Culver
:ECC doesn't protect against certain types of motherboard address line
: errors (since although the ECC is correct, the selected address is wrong, so
: thus the data is wrong). There's parity protection on parts of the CPU
: address bus, but I don't believe there is any protection between the
anyone successful installing staroffice 5.1?
is http://lt.tar.com/so50.out still the best hint?
randy
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
On Tue, 5 Oct 1999, Daniel C. Sobral wrote:
Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
You need to move your sources further forward.
Alas, it didn't help. What versions of what files I should have? The
warnings are still appearing, at fsck time.
Alas, similarly I get:
changing root device to wd0s1a
17 matches
Mail list logo
