Re: KDE kdm problem with packaged version (make release issue?)

2000-03-25 Thread R. Imura
* It's because, there are no /usr/X11R6/bin/X in Asami-san's chroot * environment, I bet. Hmm. So kdm looks at the X symlink to decide whether to build with X support or not? I can add that to my X package, but what exactly do I need? Just the symlink (to nowhere), or do I need it

Re: KDE kdm problem with packaged version (make release issue?)

2000-03-25 Thread R. Imura
kdm determines X path as 'test -f $PATH/bin/X', so touching X is enough. ^^^ $PATH/X -- R. Imura // my private mail address has changed. // [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] /(-.-)y-~~ To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with

Re: -current, ep and fragment problems.

2000-03-25 Thread Jeroen Ruigrok/Asmodai
-On [2325 08:00], Andrew Sherrod ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: My 3.4 machine at work has periodic problems with the fxp. No performance issues (perhaps a little slow, but the network is congested enough that this is hard to measure). However it does periodically display an error message about

Re: fd0: Debugger(d_iocmd botch) called.

2000-03-25 Thread FreeBSD mailing list
Bruce wrote: On Fri, 24 Mar 2000, Jim Bloom wrote: FreeBSD mailing list wrote: This patch does indeed fix the writing of floppies. However, fdformat(1) still fails as follows: That is very strange. My patch only applies to formatting floppies. It did not touch any routine

Re: Anyone know why the syscall interface is using the doretimechanism?

2000-03-25 Thread Matthew Dillon
Ah, excellent summary Bruce! Now I know what to look for and test re: syscall returns. I'm confident I can at least test for the cases without needing the MP lock, which is all we really need to be able to optimize the critical path. I have also successfully removed all

Re: 'machine/param.h' required for 'sys/socket.h'

2000-03-25 Thread Yoshinobu Inoue
Arrgh. Now it seems I might need to reverse my position. I looked through some code fragments in UNIX Network Programming (Volume 1, Second Edition, pp. 362-365), and there's some precedent for needing sys/param.h with the CMSG*() macros. On the other hand, RFC 2292 and

Re: Accessing FreeBSD 3.4-STABLE filesystems from 4.0-STABLE...

2000-03-25 Thread Alexander Langer
Thus spake Brad Knowles ([EMAIL PROTECTED]): upgraded it to 4.0-STABLE on a second hard drive, and I likewise can't access the 4.0-STABLE filesystems from 3.4-STABLE. If you don't tell us where it fails (and how), we can't help you. Alex To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: 'machine/param.h' required for 'sys/socket.h'

2000-03-25 Thread Yoshinobu Inoue
So I think machine/param.h should be included from sys/socket.h for more portability. machine/param.h can't be included in any standard header (except in sys/param.h) because it gives massive, undocumented namespace pollution. The macro `MACHINE' is especially likely to conflict with

Re: 'machine/param.h' required for 'sys/socket.h'

2000-03-25 Thread Bruce Evans
On Sat, 25 Mar 2000, Yoshinobu Inoue wrote: Instead, CMSG* should use _ALIGN() and _ALIGN() should be implemented somewhere that doesn't add any namespace pollution. We currently use machine/ansi.h for things like this, but it is already too overloaded. OK, then how about creating

2.2.8 to 4.0 upgrade

2000-03-25 Thread Maxim Kolinko
how to upgrade 2.2.8-STABLE to 4.0-STABLE ? cd /usr/src; make aout-to-elf-build -- stage 3: cross tools -- cd /usr/src; MAKEOBJDIRPREFIX=/usr/obj/aout/i386/usr/src/ibm-pc

Re: Accessing FreeBSD 3.4-STABLE filesystems from 4.0-STABLE...

2000-03-25 Thread Jeroen Ruigrok van der Werven
-On [2325 03:05], Brad Knowles ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: I gotta be doing something stupid here. I haven't been able to access the existing 3.4-STABLE filesystems on this machine since I upgraded it to 4.0-STABLE on a second hard drive, and I likewise can't access the 4.0-STABLE

Re: 2.2.8 to 4.0 upgrade

2000-03-25 Thread Alexander Langer
Thus spake Maxim Kolinko ([EMAIL PROTECTED]): how to upgrade 2.2.8-STABLE to 4.0-STABLE ? cd /usr/src; make aout-to-elf-build upgrade to RELENG_3 first. Alex To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message

Re: 2.2.8 to 4.0 upgrade

2000-03-25 Thread Jeroen Ruigrok van der Werven
-On [2325 16:35], Alexander Langer ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: Thus spake Maxim Kolinko ([EMAIL PROTECTED]): how to upgrade 2.2.8-STABLE to 4.0-STABLE ? cd /usr/src; make aout-to-elf-build upgrade to RELENG_3 first. Yeah. I recently did a 3.0 - 3.4 upgrade by source. That was paying

Re: 'machine/param.h' required for 'sys/socket.h'

2000-03-25 Thread Yoshinobu Inoue
Instead, CMSG* should use _ALIGN() and _ALIGN() should be implemented somewhere that doesn't add any namespace pollution. We currently use machine/ansi.h for things like this, but it is already too overloaded. OK, then how about creating machine/align.h? That approach in

Somebody broke alpha kernel builds?

2000-03-25 Thread Jordan K. Hubbard
cc -c -O -Wall -Wredundant-decls -Wnested-externs -Wstrict-prototypes -Wmissing-prototypes -Wpointer-arith -Winline -Wcast-qual -fformat-extensions -ansi -nostdinc -I- -I. -I../.. -I../../../include -D_KERNEL -include opt_global.h -elf -mno-fp-regs -Wa,-mev56 ../../alpha/alpha/clock.c

Re: Somebody broke alpha kernel builds?

2000-03-25 Thread Matthew Jacob
Yes, this was broken for several days. I was just getting ready to fix it when David O'Brien fixed it (after asking Poul who had made the changes causing it). On Sat, 25 Mar 2000, Jordan K. Hubbard wrote: cc -c -O -Wall -Wredundant-decls -Wnested-externs -Wstrict-prototypes

malloc.conf

2000-03-25 Thread Arun Sharma
After upgrading to 4.0 from source, I had a simple program which called malloc core dump on me. After ktrace'ing it and creating /etc/malloc.conf it was happier. But I can't find malloc.conf anywhere in /usr/src. How does it get created during the build ? -Arun To Unsubscribe: send

Re: malloc.conf

2000-03-25 Thread Arun Sharma
On Sat, Mar 25, 2000 at 08:55:16PM +0100, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote: Please read the malloc(3) manual page. I did and created malloc.conf as documented there. And things were fine after that. Wouldn't it be better if the build process created a default /etc/malloc.conf ? -Arun To

Re: malloc.conf

2000-03-25 Thread Poul-Henning Kamp
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Arun Sharma writes: On Sat, Mar 25, 2000 at 08:55:16PM +0100, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote: Please read the malloc(3) manual page. I did and created malloc.conf as documented there. And things were fine after that. Wouldn't it be better if the build process created

Re: Somebody broke alpha kernel builds?

2000-03-25 Thread Jonathan Lemon
In article local.mail.freebsd-current/[EMAIL PROTECTED] you write: cc -c -O -Wall -Wredundant-decls -Wnested-externs -Wstrict-prototypes -Wmissing-prototypes -Wpointer-arith -Winline -Wcast-qual -fformat-extensions -ansi -nostdinc -I- -I. -I../.. -I../../../include -D_KERNEL -include

Re: malloc.conf

2000-03-25 Thread Jordan K. Hubbard
I did and created malloc.conf as documented there. And things were fine after that. Wouldn't it be better if the build process created a default /etc/malloc.conf ? It's purely an optional file; one doesn't need to be installed by default in order for things to behave as expected. Consider it

Re: Somebody broke alpha kernel builds?

2000-03-25 Thread Jordan K. Hubbard
Speaking of which, why is /home/ncvs on beast not pointing to the current CVS repository? I got bit by the same error after doing (what I thought) was a correct `cvs update' on beast. Sorry, "my bad"; the alpha releases were falling over on some sort of NFS bogon (and cvs checkouts using

Re: malloc.conf

2000-03-25 Thread Arun Sharma
On Sat, Mar 25, 2000 at 09:05:18PM +0100, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote: In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Arun Sharma writes: On Sat, Mar 25, 2000 at 08:55:16PM +0100, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote: Please read the malloc(3) manual page. I did and created malloc.conf as documented there. And things

Re: malloc.conf

2000-03-25 Thread Poul-Henning Kamp
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Arun Sharma writes: On Sat, Mar 25, 2000 at 09:05:18PM +0100, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote: In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Arun Sharma writes: On Sat, Mar 25, 2000 at 08:55:16PM +0100, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote: Please read the malloc(3) manual page. I did and

Re: malloc.conf

2000-03-25 Thread Arun Sharma
On Sat, Mar 25, 2000 at 12:11:50PM -0800, Jordan K. Hubbard wrote: I did and created malloc.conf as documented there. And things were fine after that. Wouldn't it be better if the build process created a default /etc/malloc.conf ? It's purely an optional file; one doesn't need to be

Re: Anyone know why the syscall interface is using the doreti mechanism?

2000-03-25 Thread Warner Losh
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] Matthew Dillon writes: : It's getting clean enough that you can almost understand the interrupt : code :-) Cool. That's one part of the kernel that I've not quite fully understood. I always figured there was something I was missing about the code and why

Re: Accessing FreeBSD 3.4-STABLE filesystems from 4.0-STABLE...

2000-03-25 Thread Warner Losh
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] Jeroen Ruigrok van der Werven writes: : Block/character device collapsing breaking you up now? : : /dev/ Should only be character devices now. I was surprised how many block devices were in my /dev when I did a ls -l /dev | grep ^b. Maybe we should put something

Re: Why are all accesses to the cpl surrounded by a lock?

2000-03-25 Thread Alfred Perlstein
* Matthew Dillon [EMAIL PROTECTED] [000324 21:52] wrote: I've been doing more SMP cleanup and for the life of me I can't figure out why cpl operations are surrounded by its own [S]CPL_LOCK ?? As far as I can tell, the cpl is only accessed/modified: * by mainline code

Re: 2.2.8 to 4.0 upgrade

2000-03-25 Thread Kris Kennaway
On Sat, 25 Mar 2000, Maxim Kolinko wrote: how to upgrade 2.2.8-STABLE to 4.0-STABLE ? 1) Do a binary upgrade. This will be *by far* the easiest for you 2) Upgrade to 3.2-RELEASE, then upgrade to 4.0-STABLE for the 3-4 upgrade be sure to follow all the steps listed in /usr/src/UPDATING,

Re: Accessing FreeBSD 3.4-STABLE filesystems from 4.0-STABLE...

2000-03-25 Thread Doug Barton
Warner Losh wrote: In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] Jeroen Ruigrok van der Werven writes: : Block/character device collapsing breaking you up now? : : /dev/ Should only be character devices now. I was surprised how many block devices were in my /dev when I did a ls -l /dev | grep ^b.

MegaRAID jiggles clock?

2000-03-25 Thread David Gilbert
I'm wondering if the AMI MegaRAID controller/driver might be the reason that I'm getting a large number of clock resets from ntpd. About every half hour, ntpd seems to feel the need to reset the clock on the server by about 1/3 of a second. The server has a moderate NFS load (going out through

Re: MegaRAID jiggles clock?

2000-03-25 Thread Kevin Day
I'm wondering if the AMI MegaRAID controller/driver might be the reason that I'm getting a large number of clock resets from ntpd. About every half hour, ntpd seems to feel the need to reset the clock on the server by about 1/3 of a second. The server has a moderate NFS load (going out

Re: MegaRAID jiggles clock?

2000-03-25 Thread David Gilbert
"Kevin" == Kevin Day [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: [about clock jiggling] Kevin Granted, this is an old 4.0-current machine(from around Kevin September), but I've seen heavy NFS server load affect the Kevin clocks on all three of my NFS servers. The heavier the load, Kevin the faster the

Re: Accessing FreeBSD 3.4-STABLE filesystems from4.0-STABLE...

2000-03-25 Thread Brad Knowles
At 10:18 AM +1000 2000/3/26, Tony Maher wrote: No, sd is deprecated. AFAIK its da only in 4.0, and only character devices. 3.4 has sd compatability and has block devices. Hmm. Okay, well I note that what's being used right now is da1s1a through da1s1h, and I had copied these

SMP syscall timing program (was Re: Why are all accesses to the cpl surrounded by a lock?)

2000-03-25 Thread Matthew Dillon
:Otherwise right now your guess is as good as mine. : :As a side note, it seems silly that we do this: : :MPLOCKED incl _cnt+V_SYSCALL :SYSCALL_LOCK :call_syscall : :I think per-cpu statistics would be an interesting optimization, :since you're testing all of this,

Re: Anyone know why the syscall interface is using the doreti mechanism?

2000-03-25 Thread Matthew Dillon
: :In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] Matthew Dillon writes: :: It's getting clean enough that you can almost understand the interrupt :: code :-) : :Cool. That's one part of the kernel that I've not quite fully :understood. I always figured there was something I was missing about :the code

指定の女性(知人等)のAVを密かに撮影します

2000-03-25 Thread esuemu
(従来紹介制で行っていたサービスを試験的に電子DMでご案内しています。

Re: Accessing FreeBSD 3.4-STABLE filesystems from4.0-STABLE...

2000-03-25 Thread Doug Barton
Brad Knowles wrote: When I try to mount my 3.4-STABLE root filesystem on /old, here's what I get: $ mount /old mount: /dev/da0s1a on /old: incorrect super block 'fsck -y /dev/da0s1a' -- "So, the cows were part of a dream that dreamed

emacs-20.6 core dumps in FreeBSD-4.0-RELEASE

2000-03-25 Thread Mohit Aron
Hi, I installed the package for emacs-20.6 on my machine running FreeBSD-4.0-RELEASE and it core dumps upon issuing the command 'emacs -nw'. This package was obtained from: ftp://ftp.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/releases/i386/4.0-RELEASE/packages/All/emacs-20.6.tgz However, it runs

smp-patch-06 (hopefully w/ proper syscall return handling) ready

2000-03-25 Thread Matthew Dillon
smp-patch-06 is now ready. http://www.backplane.com/FreeBSD4/ http://www.backplane.com/FreeBSD4/smp-patch-06.diff Bruce, I'd appreciate a quick review of my solution to the AST issue. Search for 'syscall_ast_exit' in i386/i386/exception.s after patching. I

Re: Accessing FreeBSD 3.4-STABLE filesystems from 4.0-STABLE...

2000-03-25 Thread Mark Ovens
On Sat, Mar 25, 2000 at 01:40:05PM -0700, Warner Losh wrote: In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] Jeroen Ruigrok van der Werven writes: : Block/character device collapsing breaking you up now? : : /dev/ Should only be character devices now. I was surprised how many block devices were in my /dev

Updating examples /usr/share/examples/ld

2000-03-25 Thread Stephen Hocking-Senior Programmer PGS SPS Perth
Can someone please update the examples in /usr/share/examples/kld? It's a bit confusing when it doesn't even compile. Stephen To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message