Re: Userbase of -current

2001-07-21 Thread Warner Losh
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] Vincent Poy writes: : Somehow I always thought there were more than 50 people who are : really running current. We do stress test it though and it had : performed flawlessly over the past 8 years. Question though, does anyone : happen to know what the largest

Re: The whole libc FILE/stdio mess and 5.0

2001-07-21 Thread Warner Losh
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] Daniel Eischen writes: : Were we going to do anything to get rid of: : : #define stdin (__sF[0]) : #define stdout (__sF[1]) : #define stderr (__sF[2]) : : for 5.0-release, or is the current fix the one we want to : go with. I don't know if we

Re: [Patch] ACPI support in rc.conf

2001-07-21 Thread Alexander Leidinger
On 20 Jul, Mike Smith wrote: attached is a diff for rc.i386, rc.conf.5 and defaults/rc.conf which allows to enable the ACPI power management in rc.conf similar to apm_enable. This is not a good idea; ACPI isn't on or off, and by the time What does acpiconf -e do then? Bye, Alexander. --

Re: [Patch] ACPI support in rc.conf

2001-07-21 Thread Mike Smith
On 20 Jul, Mike Smith wrote: attached is a diff for rc.i386, rc.conf.5 and defaults/rc.conf which allows to enable the ACPI power management in rc.conf similar to apm_enable. This is not a good idea; ACPI isn't on or off, and by the time What does acpiconf -e do then? Nothing