Re: i386 tinderbox failure

2002-10-08 Thread Bruce Evans
On Tue, 8 Oct 2002, Peter Wemm wrote: > "David O'Brien" wrote: > > On Tue, Oct 08, 2002 at 03:55:36PM -0400, John Baldwin wrote: > > > Could you please just commit this on the vendor branch if it is the > > > ... > > Doing this screws up diffs to vendor source as there won't be a tag that > > cor

Re: DDB sysctl function

2002-10-08 Thread Bruce Evans
On Tue, 8 Oct 2002, John Baldwin wrote: > On 08-Oct-2002 Vladimir B. " Grebenschikov wrote: > > ÷ Tue, 08.10.2002, × 22:25, Maxime Henrion ÎÁÐÉÓÁÌ: > >> - I'm not sure if using the context of the init process to do sysctl > >> calls is the right way to go. However, it is not very clear what yo

Re: My problems with GEOM

2002-10-08 Thread Poul-Henning Kamp
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, "Seth Hieronymus" writes: >I think your recent commits have fixed my hang on boot with an empty >ZIP-drive. Thank you. Cool. -- Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20 [EMAIL PROTECTED] | TCP/IP since RFC 956 FreeBSD committer | BSD s

i386 tinderbox failure

2002-10-08 Thread Dag-Erling Smorgrav
-- >>> Rebuilding the temporary build tree -- >>> stage 1: bootstrap tools -- >>> stage 2: cleaning up the object tree

Re: [PATCH] Re: Junior Kernel Hacker page updated...

2002-10-08 Thread Don Lewis
On 8 Oct, Stefan Farfeleder wrote: > On Mon, Oct 07, 2002 at 03:48:45AM -0700, Terry Lambert wrote: > Following the advice from the spl* man page I turned the spl* calls to a > mutex and was surprised to see it working. My SMP -current survived a 'make > -j16 buildworld' with make using kqueue()

Re: alpha tinderbox failure

2002-10-08 Thread Jeff Roberson
On Tue, 8 Oct 2002, Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote: > "Makefile", line 4194: warning: duplicate script for target "geom_bsd.o" ignored > cc1: warnings being treated as errors > /h/des/src/sys/dev/advansys/adv_pci.c: In function `adv_pci_attach': > /h/des/src/sys/dev/advansys/adv_pci.c:197: warning: o

Re: My problems with GEOM

2002-10-08 Thread Seth Hieronymus
I think your recent commits have fixed my hang on boot with an empty ZIP-drive. Thank you. Seth To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message

Re: tar problems with --fast-read

2002-10-08 Thread Tim Robbins
On Tue, Oct 08, 2002 at 10:01:09AM -0700, Gordon Tetlow wrote: > I was trying out the fast-read feature of tar and got the following: > > gtetlow@roark:~$ touch testa testb > gtetlow@roark:~$ tar cf test.tar testa testb > gtetlow@roark:~$ tar tf test.tar --fast-read

swap_pager: I/O error - pageout failed

2002-10-08 Thread Michael McGoldrick
Just noticed a whole load of these in my /var/log/messages: Oct 9 00:43:31 uriel kernel: swap_pager: I/O error - pageout failed; blkno 1065 6,size 8192, error 5 Seeming to correspond to a temporary hang of X. Any ideas? -- Michael McGoldrick: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Copyright (c) 1992-2002 The Fre

Re: i386 tinderbox failure

2002-10-08 Thread David O'Brien
On Tue, Oct 08, 2002 at 04:10:42PM -0700, Peter Wemm wrote: > "David O'Brien" wrote: > > On Tue, Oct 08, 2002 at 03:55:36PM -0400, John Baldwin wrote: > > > Could you please just commit this on the vendor branch if it is the > > > vendor fix for now. Since the next vendor import will contain the

Discount Smokes

2002-10-08 Thread Fred Elan
Warning Unable to process data: multipart/mixed;boundary="=_NextPart_000_00B1_50B14E5B.D1605A60"

alpha tinderbox failure

2002-10-08 Thread Dag-Erling Smorgrav
-- >>> Rebuilding the temporary build tree -- >>> stage 1: bootstrap tools -- >>> stage 2: cleaning up the object tree

Re: i386 tinderbox failure

2002-10-08 Thread Peter Wemm
"David O'Brien" wrote: > On Tue, Oct 08, 2002 at 03:55:36PM -0400, John Baldwin wrote: > > Could you please just commit this on the vendor branch if it is the > > vendor fix for now. Since the next vendor import will contain the > > fix you don't need to worry about maintaining the local patch so

Re: sorry state of Xserver in 5.0

2002-10-08 Thread Michael Reifenberger
On Tue, 8 Oct 2002, Andrew Gallatin wrote: ... > Question: Did the "Bezier too big" stuff start when people upgraded > their X server port, or when they upgraded their kernel? (I just > started running -current on an x86 last week) I have a sneaking > suspicion that the fp context is not being sa

Re: i386 tinderbox failure

2002-10-08 Thread David O'Brien
On Tue, Oct 08, 2002 at 03:55:36PM -0400, John Baldwin wrote: > Could you please just commit this on the vendor branch if it is the > vendor fix for now. Since the next vendor import will contain the > fix you don't need to worry about maintaining the local patch so > committing it onto the vendo

Re: DDB sysctl function

2002-10-08 Thread John Baldwin
On 08-Oct-2002 Vladimir B. " Grebenschikov wrote: > ÷ Tue, 08.10.2002, × 22:25, Maxime Henrion ÎÁÐÉÓÁÌ: >> Vladimir B. Grebenschikov wrote: >> > Hi >> > >> > Attached diff introduces new ddb interface - access to sysctl interface >> [...] >> >> Looks like this would be very useful. I have

Re: hotspot 1.3.1 not such ansi.h file error

2002-10-08 Thread Hui
On Tue, Oct 08, 2002 at 10:01:01PM +0800, suken woo wrote: > /usr/ports/java/jdk13/work/hotspot1.3.1/src/os/linux/vm/os_linux.cpp:49:26: > machine/ansi.h: No such file or directory With the current release of HotSpot for -current, you'll have to know enough about C programming to be able to fix

Re: DDB sysctl function

2002-10-08 Thread Vladimir B.
÷ Tue, 08.10.2002, × 22:25, Maxime Henrion ÎÁÐÉÓÁÌ: > Vladimir B. Grebenschikov wrote: > > Hi > > > > Attached diff introduces new ddb interface - access to sysctl interface > [...] > > Looks like this would be very useful. I have a few comments, mainly > about style though. Attached fixed

Re: [PATCH] Re: Junior Kernel Hacker page updated...

2002-10-08 Thread Stefan Farfeleder
On Mon, Oct 07, 2002 at 03:48:45AM -0700, Terry Lambert wrote: > > *** OK, it's very hard to believe you didn't break into the > *** debugger and manually call "pnaic" to get this to happen. You're right, this is exactly what I did. > I can't personally repeat the problem, so you're elected to

Re: hotspot 1.3.1 not such ansi.h file error

2002-10-08 Thread Hui
On Tue, Oct 08, 2002 at 12:02:46PM -0400, Mike Barcroft wrote: > AFAICT the include here is bogus. Removing it should > fix this. It's a problem known by me, but I haven't committed a fix just yet to our CVS. Working on signal/sigsetjmp stuff here right now. Eventually a new patch set should b

-march=pentium4 (CPUTYPE?=p4) breaks libm (src/lib/msun)

2002-10-08 Thread Martin Blapp
Hi, If one does libm compile with -march=pentium4, there seem some math related functions be broken. -march=pentiumpro still works fine. Happens with gcc 3.1.1 and gcc 3.2.1 prerelease. Ports which are broken with libm and -march=pentium4 - xmms (no sound) - mpg123 (no sound) - openoffice (no

RE: -march=pentium4 (CPUTYPE?=p4) breaks libm (src/lib/msun)

2002-10-08 Thread John Baldwin
On 08-Oct-2002 Martin Blapp wrote: > > Hi, > > If one does libm compile with -march=pentium4, there seem some > math related functions be broken. -march=pentiumpro still works fine. > > Happens with gcc 3.1.1 and gcc 3.2.1 prerelease. > > Ports which are broken with libm and -march=pentium4 >

Re: i386 tinderbox failure

2002-10-08 Thread John Baldwin
On 08-Oct-2002 Alexander Kabaev wrote: > >> ./aicasm: 877 instructions used >> ./aicasm: 686 instructions used >> cc: Internal error: Segmentation fault (program cpp0) >> Please submit a full bug report. >> See http://www.gnu.org/software/gcc/bugs.html> for instructions. >> mkdep: compile failed

Re: panic from _mutex_assert in kern_lock.c

2002-10-08 Thread Steven G. Kargl
Jeff Roberson said: > > On Sat, 5 Oct 2002, Brian F. Feldman wrote: > >> "Steven G. Kargl" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>> The source tree was retrieved by cvsup >>> at 21:47 (PST) on Oct 4. >>> >>> This is a non-GEOM and non-acpi kernel. >>> >>> I have the core and kernel.debug, so any >>> furth

Re: DDB sysctl function

2002-10-08 Thread Julian Elischer
VERY COOL! On 8 Oct 2002, Vladimir B. Grebenschikov wrote: > Hi > > Attached diff introduces new ddb interface - access to sysctl interface > > sysctl - read sysctl value > sysctlw - write sysctl value > > Example: > > Translate string to sysctl MIB: > > db> sysctlw 0.3 hw\.model >

Re: panic from _mutex_assert in kern_lock.c

2002-10-08 Thread Jeff Roberson
On Sat, 5 Oct 2002, Brian F. Feldman wrote: > "Steven G. Kargl" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > The source tree was retrieved by cvsup > > at 21:47 (PST) on Oct 4. > > > > This is a non-GEOM and non-acpi kernel. > > > > I have the core and kernel.debug, so any > > further postmortem is possible.

Re: vnode lock assertion failure in nfs_doio()

2002-10-08 Thread Jeff Roberson
On Wed, 2 Oct 2002, Don Lewis wrote: > Version 1.114 of nfs_bio.c added a call to ASSERT_VOP_LOCKED() to > nfs_doio(). I've been running a kernel with the DEBUG_VFS_LOCKS option > and I can consistently get this assertion to fail by running mozilla > with an nfs mounted home directory. The DDB

Re: DDB sysctl function

2002-10-08 Thread Maxime Henrion
Vladimir B. Grebenschikov wrote: > Hi > > Attached diff introduces new ddb interface - access to sysctl interface [...] Looks like this would be very useful. I have a few comments, mainly about style though. - There is a TOK_STRING_SIZE macro which defines the size of the the db_tok_strin

Re: i386 tinderbox failure

2002-10-08 Thread Alexander Kabaev
> ./aicasm: 877 instructions used > ./aicasm: 686 instructions used > cc: Internal error: Segmentation fault (program cpp0) > Please submit a full bug report. > See http://www.gnu.org/software/gcc/bugs.html> for instructions. > mkdep: compile failed > *** Error code 1 http://people.freebsd.org/~

Re: i386 tinderbox failure

2002-10-08 Thread mgoward
On Tue, Oct 08, 2002 at 09:41:40AM -0700 or thereabouts, Dag-Erling Smorgrav was said to have scribed: > -- > >>> stage 4: populating >/home/des/tinderbox/i386/obj/local0/scratch/des/src/i386/usr/include > --

Re: [acpi-jp 1789] Re: ACPI video driver (for Dell Latitude C640)

2002-10-08 Thread Lars Eggert
Mark, any news on this issue? I'm seeing the same problems with suspend on a Dell Latitude C600 with a ATI Mobility M3... Lars Mark Santcroos wrote: > On Wed, Sep 11, 2002 at 12:22:04AM +0900, Mitsuru IWASAKI wrote: > >>>Do you think that there is a change that this is in the direction of DPM

Re: sorry state of Xserver in 5.0

2002-10-08 Thread Maxim Sobolev
Maxim Sobolev wrote: > > Maxim Sobolev wrote: > > > > Andrew Gallatin wrote: > > > > > > Maxim Sobolev writes: > > > > > > > > Between this, and the Type1 bezier font abort, the state of 5.0 on a > > > > > desktop is very sorry indeed. My old alpha running -stable is far > > > > > more stable

DDB sysctl function

2002-10-08 Thread Vladimir B.
Hi Attached diff introduces new ddb interface - access to sysctl interface sysctl - read sysctl value sysctlw - write sysctl value Example: Translate string to sysctl MIB: db> sysctlw 0.3 hw\.model 0xcd1aaeec: 6 2 db> Now get string by this MIB: db> sysctl 6.2 s 0xcd1ab24: Penti

Re: tar problems with --fast-read

2002-10-08 Thread Maxim Sobolev
Gordon Tetlow wrote: > > I was trying out the fast-read feature of tar and got the following: > > gtetlow@roark:~$ touch testa testb > gtetlow@roark:~$ tar cf test.tar testa testb > gtetlow@roark:~$ tar tf test.tar --fast-read testa > testa > Terminated > gtetlow@roark:~$ > > Further investigti

Re: addport b0rken in current

2002-10-08 Thread Will Andrews
On Tue, Oct 08, 2002 at 06:15:38PM +0300, Maxim Sobolev wrote: > Any progress on this??? It's PITA that I can't use my -current > development box to commit new ports. Sorry, I hadn't even started to look at this. It seems to be a -CURRENT cvs(1) problem judging by your log, in that it ignores th

tar problems with --fast-read

2002-10-08 Thread Gordon Tetlow
I was trying out the fast-read feature of tar and got the following: gtetlow@roark:~$ touch testa testb gtetlow@roark:~$ tar cf test.tar testa testb gtetlow@roark:~$ tar tf test.tar --fast-read testa testa Terminated gtetlow@roark:~$ Further investigtion shows that

i386 tinderbox failure

2002-10-08 Thread Dag-Erling Smorgrav
-- >>> Rebuilding the temporary build tree -- >>> stage 1: bootstrap tools -- >>> stage 2: cleaning up the object tree

Re: sorry state of Xserver in 5.0

2002-10-08 Thread Maxim Sobolev
Maxim Sobolev wrote: > > Andrew Gallatin wrote: > > > > Maxim Sobolev writes: > > > > > > Between this, and the Type1 bezier font abort, the state of 5.0 on a > > > > desktop is very sorry indeed. My old alpha running -stable is far > > > > more stable. > > > > > > > > Sigh. > > > > > > A

Changes to Kerberos daemon startup

2002-10-08 Thread Gordon Tetlow
I have a patch at http://people.freebsd.org/~gordon/patches/kerberos.diff that changes the variables used for kerberos startup. I haven't had a chance to test these changes just yet, but I'd like peoples opinion on them. There will be a corresponding change in rc.d scripts that I have to make yet.

Re: X11 unstable under CURRENT and STABLE.

2002-10-08 Thread Kris Kennaway
On Tue, Oct 08, 2002 at 12:33:50PM +0200, Jon wrote: > Crashes fo r me too, reporting Sigint 6, Basically whenever it is idle. > Usually just running Opera and Mozilla-mail. > > Any Sugestions?? This has been discussed extensively in recent days. Kris msg44294/pgp0.pgp Description: PGP

Re: sorry state of Xserver in 5.0

2002-10-08 Thread Maxim Sobolev
Andrew Gallatin wrote: > > Maxim Sobolev writes: > > > > Between this, and the Type1 bezier font abort, the state of 5.0 on a > > > desktop is very sorry indeed. My old alpha running -stable is far > > > more stable. > > > > > > Sigh. > > > > Agreed. I could add that after recent kernel

Re: Removing old binaries

2002-10-08 Thread David Schultz
Thus spake M. Warner Losh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > "Greg 'groggy' Lehey" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > : I think it confuses the issue rather than solving it. We're talking > : about removing binaries which are no longer needed, not replacing > : binari

Re: hotspot 1.3.1 not such ansi.h file error

2002-10-08 Thread Mike Barcroft
suken woo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > hi,all: > get the error messages during gmake core > gmake[1]: Entering directory > `/usr/ports/java/jdk13/work/hotspot1.3.1/build/linux/linux_i486_core/jvmg' > gmake[2]: Entering directory > `/usr/ports/java/jdk13/work/hotspot1.3.1/build/linux/linux_i486_

Re: booting on Promise tx2 ata100

2002-10-08 Thread John Baldwin
On 08-Oct-2002 Ceri Davies wrote: > On Tue, Oct 08, 2002 at 04:58:46PM +0200, Soeren Schmidt wrote: >> It seems Ceri Davies wrote: >> > >> > > If you relocate your disk you might need to adjust fstab. >> > > It seems disks are addressed absolutely in FreeBSD. >> >> Only if you have "option ATA_

Re: sorry state of Xserver in 5.0

2002-10-08 Thread Andrew Gallatin
Alexander Leidinger writes: > On Tue, 8 Oct 2002 10:56:54 -0400 (EDT) > Andrew Gallatin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > I'm going to downgrade sys/i386/i386/machdep.c to 1.539 now and have a > > > > look how the system behaves. > > > > > > Doesn't work, I still get signal 6. >

Re: sorry state of Xserver in 5.0

2002-10-08 Thread Wesley Morgan
On Tue, 8 Oct 2002, Alexander Leidinger wrote: > > To fix signal 6, I think you need to rebuild your X server. > > Do you think I have to rebuild or do you know I have to rebuild? I've rebuilt several times. I'm guessing NO, since I still have the problems periodically. --

Re: sorry state of Xserver in 5.0

2002-10-08 Thread Alexander Leidinger
On Tue, 8 Oct 2002 10:56:54 -0400 (EDT) Andrew Gallatin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > I'm going to downgrade sys/i386/i386/machdep.c to 1.539 now and have a > > > look how the system behaves. > > > > Doesn't work, I still get signal 6. > > That won't fix signal 6. That will just fix the

Re: booting on Promise tx2 ata100

2002-10-08 Thread Ceri Davies
On Tue, Oct 08, 2002 at 04:58:46PM +0200, Soeren Schmidt wrote: > It seems Ceri Davies wrote: > > > > > If you relocate your disk you might need to adjust fstab. > > > It seems disks are addressed absolutely in FreeBSD. > > Only if you have "option ATA_STATIC_ID" in your kernel config. > > > No

Re: Fw: hotspot 1.3.1 not such ansi.h file error

2002-10-08 Thread suken woo
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >- Original Message - >From: "Yuri Khotyaintsev" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >To: "suken woo" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Sent: Tuesday, October 08, 2002 10:16 PM >Subject: Re: hotspot 1.3.1 not such ansi.h file error > > > > >>This file was recently

Re: booting on Promise tx2 ata100

2002-10-08 Thread Soeren Schmidt
It seems Ceri Davies wrote: > > > If you relocate your disk you might need to adjust fstab. > > It seems disks are addressed absolutely in FreeBSD. Only if you have "option ATA_STATIC_ID" in your kernel config. > No, I'm talking about a panic just after probing SMBus. This patch solves this pr

Re: sorry state of Xserver in 5.0

2002-10-08 Thread Andrew Gallatin
Alexander Leidinger writes: > On Tue, 8 Oct 2002 15:27:27 +0200 > Alexander Leidinger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > I'm going to downgrade sys/i386/i386/machdep.c to 1.539 now and have a > > look how the system behaves. > > Doesn't work, I still get signal 6. That won't fix signal 6.

Re: sorry state of Xserver in 5.0

2002-10-08 Thread Alexander Leidinger
On Tue, 8 Oct 2002 15:27:27 +0200 Alexander Leidinger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I'm going to downgrade sys/i386/i386/machdep.c to 1.539 now and have a > look how the system behaves. Doesn't work, I still get signal 6. Bye, Alexander. -- Yes, I've heard of "decaf." What's your p

hotspot 1.3.1 not such ansi.h file error

2002-10-08 Thread suken woo
hi,all: get the error messages during gmake core gmake[1]: Entering directory `/usr/ports/java/jdk13/work/hotspot1.3.1/build/linux/linux_i486_core/jvmg' gmake[2]: Entering directory `/usr/ports/java/jdk13/work/hotspot1.3.1/build/linux/linux_i486_core/jvmg' Compiling /usr/ports/java/jdk13/work/h

Re: booting on Promise tx2 ata100

2002-10-08 Thread Ceri Davies
On Tue, Oct 08, 2002 at 03:08:39PM +0200, Hanspeter Roth wrote: > On Oct 08 at 13:39, Ceri Davies spoke: > > > On Tue, Oct 08, 2002 at 02:20:15PM +0200, Hanspeter Roth wrote: > > kern/43601 states that it's currently not possible to boot current with > > one of these controllers - I'm having th

Re: sorry state of Xserver in 5.0

2002-10-08 Thread Alexander Leidinger
On Tue, 8 Oct 2002 09:04:27 -0400 (EDT) Andrew Gallatin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Question: Did the "Bezier too big" stuff start when people upgraded > their X server port, or when they upgraded their kernel? (I just > started running -current on an x86 last week) I have a sneaking > suspicio

booting on Promise tx2 ata100

2002-10-08 Thread Hanspeter Roth
On Oct 08 at 13:39, Ceri Davies spoke: > On Tue, Oct 08, 2002 at 02:20:15PM +0200, Hanspeter Roth wrote: > kern/43601 states that it's currently not possible to boot current with > one of these controllers - I'm having the same problem. > Did you need to do anything special for this to boot ?

Re: sorry state of Xserver in 5.0

2002-10-08 Thread Andrew Gallatin
Maxim Sobolev writes: > > Between this, and the Type1 bezier font abort, the state of 5.0 on a > > desktop is very sorry indeed. My old alpha running -stable is far > > more stable. > > > > Sigh. > > Agreed. I could add that after recent kernel updating I'm also often > observing XFre

Re: Promise tx2 ata100 and Atapi-Dma

2002-10-08 Thread Hanspeter Roth
On Oct 08 at 14:32, Soeren Schmidt spoke: > It seems Hanspeter Roth wrote: > What burner is this ? (dmesg please!) PLEXTOR CD-R PX-W4012A 1.02 http://home.datacomm.ch/~hampi/dmesg/freebsd > > Is there work in progress on this issue? > > Its not an issue as such, its more like a feature of

Re: Promise tx2 ata100 and Atapi-Dma

2002-10-08 Thread Erwin Lansing
On Tue, Oct 08, 2002 at 02:32:07PM +0200, Soeren Schmidt wrote: > It seems Hanspeter Roth wrote: > > Hello, > > > > I'm trying to run burncd on CD-RW connected via Promise TX2 ATA100 > > with UDMA2 (UDMA33) enabled. > > Reading a CD with DMA is no problem. > > Attempting to burn with DMA enabled

Re: Promise tx2 ata100 and Atapi-Dma

2002-10-08 Thread Ceri Davies
On Tue, Oct 08, 2002 at 02:20:15PM +0200, Hanspeter Roth wrote: > Hello, > > I'm trying to run burncd on CD-RW connected via Promise TX2 ATA100 > with UDMA2 (UDMA33) enabled. > Reading a CD with DMA is no problem. > Attempting to burn with DMA enabled hangs the system. This is the > case for curr

Re: Promise tx2 ata100 and Atapi-Dma

2002-10-08 Thread Soeren Schmidt
It seems Hanspeter Roth wrote: > Hello, > > I'm trying to run burncd on CD-RW connected via Promise TX2 ATA100 > with UDMA2 (UDMA33) enabled. > Reading a CD with DMA is no problem. > Attempting to burn with DMA enabled hangs the system. This is the > case for current as well as 4.6.2-Release. Wh

Promise tx2 ata100 and Atapi-Dma

2002-10-08 Thread Hanspeter Roth
Hello, I'm trying to run burncd on CD-RW connected via Promise TX2 ATA100 with UDMA2 (UDMA33) enabled. Reading a CD with DMA is no problem. Attempting to burn with DMA enabled hangs the system. This is the case for current as well as 4.6.2-Release. Is there work in progress on this issue? -Hans

Re: /usr/include/stdlib.h:51: syntax error before "size_t"

2002-10-08 Thread Hanspeter Roth
On Oct 07 at 16:28, Giorgos Keramidas spoke: > By grepping through buildworld logs I saw this passing by: > > # cd /usr/src/include; make buildincludes; make installincludes I did `make includes' which obviously does both buildincludes and installincludes. Afterwords I was able to build

alpha tinderbox failure

2002-10-08 Thread Dag-Erling Smorgrav
-- >>> Rebuilding the temporary build tree -- >>> stage 1: bootstrap tools -- >>> stage 2: cleaning up the object tree

Re: X11 unstable under CURRENT and STABLE.

2002-10-08 Thread Jon
Robert Suetterlin wrote: >Hi! > > I read a few threads on the stableness of X11 under CURRENT. >Some people proposed it was more stable under STABLE. > >I can report that my X on STABLE: > XFree86 Version 4.2.1 / X Window System > (protocol Version 11, revision 0, vendor release

Re: Can't make depend or buildkernel for a custom kernel

2002-10-08 Thread Giorgos Keramidas
On 2002-10-07 22:29, "M. Warner Losh" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Alex Zepeda <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > : > http://people.freebsd.org/~kan/gcc-cpp.diff > : > : Cool. make depend works now, let's see if the resulting kernel does. :) > > I hit this

X11 unstable under CURRENT and STABLE.

2002-10-08 Thread Robert Suetterlin
Hi! I read a few threads on the stableness of X11 under CURRENT. Some people proposed it was more stable under STABLE. I can report that my X on STABLE: XFree86 Version 4.2.1 / X Window System (protocol Version 11, revision 0, vendor release 6600) Release Date: 3

Re: sorry state of Xserver in 5.0

2002-10-08 Thread Vladimir B.
÷ Mon, 07.10.2002, × 22:13, Andrew Gallatin ÎÁÐÉÓÁÌ: > > Every so often, my X server locks up. It seems to be in a tight > loop, 95% user time, and making only these ktrace'able calls: > > 27069 XFree86 0.019988 PSIG SIGALRM caught handler=0x80d219c mask=0x0 code=0x0 > 27069 XFree86 0.

Re: HEADSUP! GEOM as default in 5 days...

2002-10-08 Thread Vladimir B.
÷ Mon, 30.09.2002, × 23:09, Poul-Henning Kamp ÎÁÐÉÓÁÌ: > > Provided nothing terminal pops up in the next 5 days, GEOM will > become default in -current on Saturday 5th of october. > > Please test it now on _your_ configuration and tell me if it > fails to work. Ok, diskcheckd (old binary) no is