On Tue, 2 Sep 2003, Matthew D. Fuller wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 02, 2003 at 12:58:40AM -0600 I heard the voice of
> Scott Long, and lo! it spake thus:
> >
> > I still think that the real problem is in running swapon before
> > savecore. In 99% of the cases out there, RAM scales with storage,
> > so I
On Mon, Sep 01, 2003 at 05:29:09PM -0600, Scott Long wrote:
> At one time I was working on patches to the loader to make the console
> speed configurable. At the time, at least, I didn't see any evidence
> that the settings were stored in the boot0 block, but maybe I was wrong.
AFAIK, the boot0 b
On Tue, 2 Sep 2003, Christoph Kukulies wrote:
> I have a file .fsck_snapshot in /usr (of 7 GB ?!)
> -r 1 root wheel 7220781056 Aug 22 18:08 .fsck_snapshot
As long as it isn't mounted it should be safe to remove.
--
Doug White| FreeBSD: The Power to Serve
[EMAIL
On Tue, Sep 02, 2003 at 12:58:40AM -0600 I heard the voice of
Scott Long, and lo! it spake thus:
>
> I still think that the real problem is in running swapon before
> savecore. In 99% of the cases out there, RAM scales with storage,
> so I really can't imaging fsck needing to swap, and certainly
Hey folks,
It looks like we may need to rethink the way swap is mounted at boot time
if we want crashdumps to work.
Recently(?), a change was made so you can no longer open a swap partition
read/write after it is activated with swapon(8). In the current boot
sequence, swap is mounted before the
101 - 105 of 105 matches
Mail list logo