Harddiskproblems

2003-10-01 Thread Gerhard Schmidt
Hi, since 3 weeks i've problems with my 5.1-CURRENT Box. When i try to delete very large direktories (for examplte the builddir of a make release) the box Panics. panic: kmem_malloc(4096): kmem_map to small: 275251200 total allocated cpuid=0: lapic.id = boot() called on cpu#0 The

Re: getdirtybuf: interlock not locked but should be

2003-10-01 Thread Jeff Roberson
On Wed, 1 Oct 2003, Garrett Wollman wrote: I'm working on getting the AFS client to work under FreeBSD. I just compiled a -current kernel with DEBUG_VFS_LOCKS, and before I could even load the AFS module I had the system stop with the following locking assertion: getdirtybuf: 0xc2678000

Re: IDE DVD playback on 5.1-CURRENT

2003-10-01 Thread Lars Eggert
Peter Kostouros wrote: I had a similar problem when running mplayer with recent kernels. My problem was that although I was executing mplayer with -dvd-device /dev/acd0, the program was trying to open /dev/racd0. I modified main/libmpdvdkit2/dvd_reader.c and sure enough everything is OK. I hope

Re: Improvements to fsck performance in -current ...?

2003-10-01 Thread Lukas Ertl
On Tue, 30 Sep 2003, Steve Kargl wrote: On Wed, Oct 01, 2003 at 01:04:51AM +0200, Lukas Ertl wrote: are either of these enhancements back-patchable to the 4.x fsck, or do they require some non-4.x compatible changes to work? It's not just the fsck application itself, background fsck

Re: Improvements to fsck performance in -current ...?

2003-10-01 Thread Jens Rehsack
Kevin Oberman wrote: [...] Current has two major changes re speeding up fsck. The most significant is the background operation of fsck on file system with soft updates enabled. Because of the way softupdates works, you are assured of metadata consistency on reboot, so the file systems can be

Re: Improvements to fsck performance in -current ...?

2003-10-01 Thread Alexander Leidinger
On Tue, 30 Sep 2003 16:25:06 -0700 Steve Kargl [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: As soon as Kirk committed the snapshot capability, snapshot became available on UFS1. The only requirement is softupdates and softupdates pre-dates UFS2. Snapshots are available in 4.9? I thought it's not only about the

ATAPI back in business

2003-10-01 Thread Conrad J. Sabatier
Just wanted to do a followup to report that the problems I was having earlier with my ata1-master device not being attached on boot have now gone away with the latest build I just completed (cvsupped Tues, 9/30). Nice work, Soren. :-) -- Conrad Sabatier [EMAIL PROTECTED] - In Unix veritas

Re: Improvements to fsck performance in -current ...?

2003-10-01 Thread Alexander Leidinger
On Tue, 30 Sep 2003 19:49:33 -0300 (ADT) Marc G. Fournier [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Now,I don't/wouldn't have softupdates enabled on / .. does the 'background fsck' know to not background if softupdates are not enabled? I'm going to switch back to -p and look a bit closer the next time it

Re: Improvements to fsck performance in -current ...?

2003-10-01 Thread Bernd Walter
On Wed, Oct 01, 2003 at 01:19:26PM +0200, Alexander Leidinger wrote: On Tue, 30 Sep 2003 16:25:06 -0700 Steve Kargl [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: As soon as Kirk committed the snapshot capability, snapshot became available on UFS1. The only requirement is softupdates and softupdates pre-dates

Tripwire Fails to build under 5.x

2003-10-01 Thread J8keR
Does this mean wait until its fixed or am I missing some update ? ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re[2]: SiI3112 SATA controller problems - status

2003-10-01 Thread Gabriel Ambuehl
Hi Soren Schmidt, you wrote. SS It seems Will Andrews wrote: On Tue, Sep 30, 2003 at 10:22:33PM +0200, Soren Schmidt wrote: No what I mean is that the Raptor is a PATA device fitted with a marvell PATA-SATA converter on board, its not a pure SATA design, but just the old stuff they used to

5.2-RELEASE TODO

2003-10-01 Thread Robert Watson
This is an automated bi-weekly mailing of the FreeBSD 5.2 open issues list. The live version of this list is available at: http://www.FreeBSD.org/releases/5.2R/todo.html Automated mailing of this list will continue through the release of FreeBSD 5.2. FreeBSD 5.2

Re: Improvements to fsck performance in -current ...?

2003-10-01 Thread Steve Kargl
On Wed, Oct 01, 2003 at 01:19:26PM +0200, Alexander Leidinger wrote: On Tue, 30 Sep 2003 16:25:06 -0700 Steve Kargl [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: As soon as Kirk committed the snapshot capability, snapshot became available on UFS1. The only requirement is softupdates and softupdates pre-dates

Re: Improvements to fsck performance in -current ...?

2003-10-01 Thread Alexander Leidinger
On Wed, 1 Oct 2003 07:22:58 -0700 Steve Kargl [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Wed, Oct 01, 2003 at 01:19:26PM +0200, Alexander Leidinger wrote: On Tue, 30 Sep 2003 16:25:06 -0700 Steve Kargl [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: As soon as Kirk committed the snapshot capability, snapshot became

Re: Re[2]: SiI3112 SATA controller problems - status

2003-10-01 Thread David Leimbach
Gabriel, Interesting, since no one's made any PATA drives that spin at 10,000 RPM as far as I know. For some reason I thought the interface change allowed for this (but couldn't come up with a good reason why it would make a difference). :) SS Hmm, PR? pricing? I guess its easier to make people

Re: Harddiskproblems

2003-10-01 Thread Robert Watson
On Wed, 1 Oct 2003, Gerhard Schmidt wrote: since 3 weeks i've problems with my 5.1-CURRENT Box. When i try to delete very large direktories (for examplte the builddir of a make release) the box Panics. panic: kmem_malloc(4096): kmem_map to small: 275251200 total allocated cpuid=0:

Re: Improvements to fsck performance in -current ...?

2003-10-01 Thread Kevin Oberman
Date: Wed, 01 Oct 2003 06:39:47 + From: Jens Rehsack [EMAIL PROTECTED] Kevin Oberman wrote: [...] Current has two major changes re speeding up fsck. The most significant is the background operation of fsck on file system with soft updates enabled. Because of the way

Re: Improvements to fsck performance in -current ...?

2003-10-01 Thread Jens Rehsack
Kevin Oberman wrote: Date: Wed, 01 Oct 2003 06:39:47 + From: Jens Rehsack [EMAIL PROTECTED] Kevin Oberman wrote: [...] Current has two major changes re speeding up fsck. The most significant is the background operation of fsck on file system with soft updates enabled. Because of the way

Re: Problem w/ ACPI in -CURRENT: Update

2003-10-01 Thread Jeremy Bingham
On 30/09/03 15:04 -0700, Nate Lawson wrote: Are you sure you tracked it down to INVARIANTS? Or was it DDB? Please try with _just_ DDB and see if you can still reproduce the problem. If so, then when it hangs, hit CTRL-ALT-ESC and type tr. This will tell who is hung. As far as debugging

Re: Problem w/ ACPI in -CURRENT: Update

2003-10-01 Thread Nate Lawson
On Wed, 1 Oct 2003, Jeremy Bingham wrote: On 30/09/03 15:04 -0700, Nate Lawson wrote: Are you sure you tracked it down to INVARIANTS? Or was it DDB? Please try with _just_ DDB and see if you can still reproduce the problem. If so, then when it hangs, hit CTRL-ALT-ESC and type tr. This

Re: Problem w/ ACPI in -CURRENT: Update

2003-10-01 Thread Jeremy Bingham
On 01/10/03 09:33 -0700, Nate Lawson wrote: On Wed, 1 Oct 2003, Jeremy Bingham wrote: On 30/09/03 15:04 -0700, Nate Lawson wrote: Are you sure you tracked it down to INVARIANTS? Or was it DDB? Please try with _just_ DDB and see if you can still reproduce the problem. If so, then

if_sis problem [still]

2003-10-01 Thread Autumn Jeff Vehrs
Poul-Henning - I've tried your patch. It worked great when I _applied_ it. After I rebooted, it went back to same OLD problem again -- crawling slow connection. It drove me crazy that I cannot figure it out to improve it when I have time on my hand. Since I have time, I'd like to help you to

Re: Tripwire Fails to build under 5.x

2003-10-01 Thread Kris Kennaway
On Wed, Oct 01, 2003 at 03:49:30PM +0300, J8keR wrote: Does this mean wait until its fixed or am I missing some update ? It means wait until it's fixed, or fix it yourself and submit the patch. Kris pgp0.pgp Description: PGP signature

Re: Harddiskproblems

2003-10-01 Thread Kris Kennaway
On Wed, Oct 01, 2003 at 11:42:34AM -0400, Robert Watson wrote: On Wed, 1 Oct 2003, Gerhard Schmidt wrote: since 3 weeks i've problems with my 5.1-CURRENT Box. When i try to delete very large direktories (for examplte the builddir of a make release) the box Panics. panic:

New SATA Hardware

2003-10-01 Thread Steve Ames
G'day. My company is putting together a system with lots of file system on it to do disk based backup. Under 5.1-CURRENT what's the best supported (and performing optimally) SATA RAID controller (RAID 0, maybe 5)? What manufacturer/model of SATA disks do you recommend for that controller?

Re: New SATA Hardware

2003-10-01 Thread Soren Schmidt
It seems Steve Ames wrote: G'day. My company is putting together a system with lots of file system on it to do disk based backup. Under 5.1-CURRENT what's the best supported (and performing optimally) SATA RAID controller (RAID 0, maybe 5)? What manufacturer/model of SATA disks do you

Re: umass(4)/uhci(4) REALLY slow

2003-10-01 Thread Nate Lawson
On Wed, 1 Oct 2003, Bruce Evans wrote: On Tue, 30 Sep 2003, Nate Lawson wrote: Here are iostat 5 results for my USB thumb drive on a uhci(4) controller with 5.1-CURRENT. On windows on the same box, it runs reasonably quickly. On FreeBSD, it really lags. This is for a cp of a large file to

Re: Problem w/ ACPI in -CURRENT: Update

2003-10-01 Thread Nate Lawson
On Wed, 1 Oct 2003, Jeremy Bingham wrote: On 01/10/03 09:33 -0700, Nate Lawson wrote: As far as debugging prints, add the following printfs to acpi_cmbat_get_bif(): printf(Before getting BIF\n); as = AcpiEvaluateObject(h, _BIF, NULL, bif_buffer); printf(After

Re: Problem w/ ACPI in -CURRENT: Update

2003-10-01 Thread Bryan Liesner
Now I'm having an issue with ACPI. I used to hit the power button and that would initiate a proper shutdown. Now it seems to do nothing, but when I reboot the system goes into a suspended state before completing the shutdown. The motherboard beeps three times, the screen goes blank, and will

ACPI shutdown problem

2003-10-01 Thread Nate Lawson
Now I'm having an issue with ACPI. I used to hit the power button and that would initiate a proper shutdown. Now it seems to do nothing, but when I reboot the system goes into a suspended state before completing the shutdown. The motherboard beeps three times, the screen goes blank, and

Re: ACPI shutdown problem

2003-10-01 Thread Bryan Liesner
On Wed, 1 Oct 2003, Nate Lawson wrote: Now I'm having an issue with ACPI. I used to hit the power button and that would initiate a proper shutdown. Now it seems to do nothing, but when I reboot the system goes into a suspended state before sysctl hw.acpi should show you what the power

Nvidia driver

2003-10-01 Thread Justin Smith
MY system: FreeBSD jsmith.org 5.1-CURRENT FreeBSD 5.1-CURRENT #0: Wed Oct 1 13:55:06 EDT 2003 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC i386 Whenever I try to use the nividia driver for X windows, my system reboots. Any suggestions? ___

Re: Nvidia driver

2003-10-01 Thread User Takawata
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Justin Smith wrote: MY system: FreeBSD jsmith.org 5.1-CURRENT FreeBSD 5.1-CURRENT #0: Wed Oct 1 13:55:06 EDT 2003 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC i386 Whenever I try to use the nividia driver for X windows, my system reboots. Any suggestions?

PAE related crash

2003-10-01 Thread Hendrik Scholz
Hi! I've just installed 5.1-RELEASE (updated to -current) on a Dual Opteron 1.4 with 6GB memory installed (MSI K8D Master-F). Without 'options PAE' the system works fine (beside the 'missing' 2GB). Enabling PAE in a custom kernel (device acpi, options SMP, options APIC_IO and makeoptions

Way Down [The Line] (was: 5.2-RELEASE TODO)

2003-10-01 Thread RMH
Dan Nelson wrote: In the last episode (Sep 29), Wilko Bulte said: On Mon, Sep 29, 2003 at 12:19:30PM -0700, Marcel Moolenaar wrote: I also mentioned recently (in the last couple of days) that we should worry more about sparc64 than alpha. Simply because I think alpha is on it's way

Working umass SD card readers.

2003-10-01 Thread Michael
Has anyone managed to get any SD card reader to work under current? I know the Sitecom CN-300 is listed in the manual page but every post I've seen regarding it was for SmartMedia. I've seen no actual confirmation that it works with SD cards. And if they do I'd have to import one from the UK as

Re: umass(4)/uhci(4) REALLY slow

2003-10-01 Thread Bruce Evans
On Wed, 1 Oct 2003, Nate Lawson wrote: On Wed, 1 Oct 2003, Bruce Evans wrote: On Tue, 30 Sep 2003, Nate Lawson wrote: Here are iostat 5 results for my USB thumb drive on a uhci(4) controller with 5.1-CURRENT. On windows on the same box, it runs reasonably quickly. On FreeBSD, it

Re: Nvidia driver

2003-10-01 Thread Mike Hunter
On Oct 01, Justin Smith wrote: MY system: FreeBSD jsmith.org 5.1-CURRENT FreeBSD 5.1-CURRENT #0: Wed Oct 1 13:55:06 EDT 2003 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC i386 Whenever I try to use the nividia driver for X windows, my system reboots. Any suggestions? ME TOO!

Re: Nvidia driver

2003-10-01 Thread Daniel O'Connor
On Thursday 02 October 2003 13:53, Mike Hunter wrote: Whenever I try to use the nividia driver for X windows, my system reboots. Any suggestions? ME TOO! My wife's computer did this. In the end I turned down all the knobs I could find (mostly AGP speed stuff). It still dies when trying

HEADS UP: APM users on -current!

2003-10-01 Thread Peter Wemm
I've made a commit that has been reported as breaking APM for some people. I'll be following this up, so could folks please report here if things break? (and feel free to say so if you find the problem :-). It would also be interesting to know that things are ok for a few people too. If you're

scsi-cd + GEOM

2003-10-01 Thread Sascha Holzleiter
Hi, with a -CURRENT from today the scsi cd driver seems to have moved under GEOM. Actually a good move this gives me a problem: I have a Plextor PX-40 cd-rom which seems to report it's status a little slow when being reinitialized this means I have to wait about 60-90 seconds during boot time