On Friday 11 June 2010 08:27:53 PseudoCylon wrote:
Hello,
Here is a patch for recent fix.
http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current/2010-June/017749.html
Please update codes in your repository.
Diff against the latest change, 178418.
* if_run.c - rev. 11
* if_runvar.h - rev. 7
On Sat, 12 Jun 2010 13:19:22 +0930
Matt Thyer matt.th...@gmail.com wrote:
However my Soekris net4801 board still takes about 2.5 minutes to boot
and I think time could be saved by parallel probing of hardware where
possible.
Much work has been done on fast boot times in the Linux world
TB --- 2010-06-12 07:47:44 - tinderbox 2.6 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca
TB --- 2010-06-12 07:47:44 - starting HEAD tinderbox run for ia64/ia64
TB --- 2010-06-12 07:47:44 - cleaning the object tree
TB --- 2010-06-12 07:48:05 - cvsupping the source tree
TB --- 2010-06-12 07:48:05 -
TB --- 2010-06-12 09:48:38 - tinderbox 2.6 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca
TB --- 2010-06-12 09:48:38 - starting HEAD tinderbox run for sparc64/sparc64
TB --- 2010-06-12 09:48:38 - cleaning the object tree
TB --- 2010-06-12 09:48:47 - cvsupping the source tree
TB --- 2010-06-12 09:48:47 -
TB --- 2010-06-12 09:19:14 - tinderbox 2.6 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca
TB --- 2010-06-12 09:19:14 - starting HEAD tinderbox run for powerpc/powerpc
TB --- 2010-06-12 09:19:15 - cleaning the object tree
TB --- 2010-06-12 09:19:27 - cvsupping the source tree
TB --- 2010-06-12 09:19:27 -
TB --- 2010-06-12 10:05:03 - tinderbox 2.6 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca
TB --- 2010-06-12 10:05:03 - starting HEAD tinderbox run for sparc64/sun4v
TB --- 2010-06-12 10:05:03 - cleaning the object tree
TB --- 2010-06-12 10:05:12 - cvsupping the source tree
TB --- 2010-06-12 10:05:12 -
Hi!
-
% uname -a
FreeBSD host.ipt.ru 9.0-CURRENT FreeBSD 9.0-CURRENT #4 r208799: Fri Jun 4
13:58:47 MSD 2010 b...@host.ipt.ru:/storage/obj/storage/src/sys/HOST i386
% make extract
=== Vulnerability check disabled, database not found
=== License check disabled, port has not defined
On 06/10/2010 20:45, Lawrence Stewart wrote:
+1 for adding to base (and updating handbook chapters makeworld.html
and small-lan.html, plus maybe /usr/src/Makefile and an UPDATING entry).
As soon as this was said the idea popped into mind to just tie etcupdate
into the source directly. Add it to
On Thu, Jun 10, 2010 at 1:14 PM, Joel Dahl j...@freebsd.org wrote:
On 10-06-2010 13:46, John Baldwin wrote:
I've had several folks ask me recently about importing etcupdate
(http://www.FreeBSD.org/~jhb/etcupdate) into the base system as an alternate
tool for updating /etc during upgrades. Do
On 12.06.2010 14:57, Sam Fourman Jr. wrote:
On Thu, Jun 10, 2010 at 1:14 PM, Joel Dahl j...@freebsd.org wrote:
On 10-06-2010 13:46, John Baldwin wrote:
I've had several folks ask me recently about importing etcupdate
(http://www.FreeBSD.org/~jhb/etcupdate) into the base system as an alternate
Quoting Mario Sergio Fujikawa Ferreira li...@freebsd.org:
Hi,
On 25/05/2010 05:45, Bernhard Froehlich wrote:
On Thu, 20 May 2010 23:05:53 -0300, Mario Sergio Fujikawa Ferreira
li...@freebsd.org wrote:
Hi,
I recently reinstalled my FreeBSD 8-STABLE box to move from
i386
Hi All!
The linked[1][2] stackgap patches why not included in FreeBSD tree? I
used this patches for a long while (~2 year ago), without problem. And
I have an updated patch for 7-STABLE:
http://peonia.teteny.elte.hu/freebsd/patches/stable/stable/20091229025818-randomize_mmap.patch
[1]
Ed Schouten e...@80386.nl writes:
Well, I've been thinking about this as well, but keep in mind that
tblgen really has no use by itself and strongly depends on the version
of your source tree. Even if we backport a tiny patch from the Clang
repository, we cannot trust tblgen to do the right
On 12.06.10 12:59, FreeBSD Tinderbox wrote:
TB --- 2010-06-12 09:19:14 - tinderbox 2.6 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca
TB --- 2010-06-12 09:19:14 - starting HEAD tinderbox run for powerpc/powerpc
TB --- 2010-06-12 09:19:15 - cleaning the object tree
TB --- 2010-06-12 09:19:27 - cvsupping
On 12.06.10 15:57, Andreas Tobler wrote:
On 12.06.10 12:59, FreeBSD Tinderbox wrote:
TB --- 2010-06-12 09:19:14 - tinderbox 2.6 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca
TB --- 2010-06-12 09:19:14 - starting HEAD tinderbox run for powerpc/powerpc
TB --- 2010-06-12 09:19:15 - cleaning the object tree
* Dag-Erling Smørgrav d...@des.no wrote:
Ed Schouten e...@80386.nl writes:
Well, I've been thinking about this as well, but keep in mind that
tblgen really has no use by itself and strongly depends on the version
of your source tree. Even if we backport a tiny patch from the Clang
In message: 4c1315f9.6000...@freebsd.org
Doug Barton do...@freebsd.org writes:
: On 06/11/10 14:18, M. Warner Losh wrote:
: This is building the proper set of tools for the target. It is easy
: to do, and only a couple lines of Makefile foo in Makefile.inc1
: instead of in
On Fri, 11.06.2010 at 21:37:29 +0200, Dag-Erling Smørgrav wrote:
Ulrich Spörlein u...@spoerlein.net writes:
optimizing compilers have a tendency to remove assignments that have
no side effects. The code in sys/crypto/sha2/sha2.c is doing a lot of
zeroing variables, which is however
On Sat, Jun 12, 2010 at 05:35:28PM +0200, Ulrich Spörlein wrote:
On Fri, 11.06.2010 at 21:37:29 +0200, Dag-Erling Smørgrav wrote:
Ulrich Spörlein u...@spoerlein.net writes:
optimizing compilers have a tendency to remove assignments that have
no side effects. The code in
On Thu, Jun 10, 2010 at 12:46 PM, John Baldwin j...@freebsd.org wrote:
I've had several folks ask me recently about importing etcupdate
(http://www.FreeBSD.org/~jhb/etcupdate) into the base system as an alternate
tool for updating /etc during upgrades. Do folks have any strong objections
to
Bernd Walter ti...@cicely7.cicely.de writes:
I'm not sure when removing a memset is allowed.
Always, if the compiler can determine that the data will not be used
later.
In more general terms, the compiler is allowed to make any changes it
likes to the program as long as the end result behaves
TB --- 2010-06-12 18:41:25 - tinderbox 2.6 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca
TB --- 2010-06-12 18:41:25 - starting HEAD tinderbox run for ia64/ia64
TB --- 2010-06-12 18:41:25 - cleaning the object tree
TB --- 2010-06-12 18:41:38 - cvsupping the source tree
TB --- 2010-06-12 18:41:38 -
On 06/12/10 08:10, M. Warner Losh wrote:
In message:4c1315f9.6000...@freebsd.org
Doug Bartondo...@freebsd.org writes:
: On 06/11/10 14:18, M. Warner Losh wrote:
: This is building the proper set of tools for the target. It is easy
: to do, and only a couple lines of Makefile foo
TB --- 2010-06-12 20:37:20 - tinderbox 2.6 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca
TB --- 2010-06-12 20:37:20 - starting HEAD tinderbox run for sparc64/sparc64
TB --- 2010-06-12 20:37:20 - cleaning the object tree
TB --- 2010-06-12 20:37:30 - cvsupping the source tree
TB --- 2010-06-12 20:37:30 -
TB --- 2010-06-12 20:10:37 - tinderbox 2.6 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca
TB --- 2010-06-12 20:10:37 - starting HEAD tinderbox run for powerpc/powerpc
TB --- 2010-06-12 20:10:37 - cleaning the object tree
TB --- 2010-06-12 20:10:48 - cvsupping the source tree
TB --- 2010-06-12 20:10:48 -
TB --- 2010-06-12 20:57:45 - tinderbox 2.6 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca
TB --- 2010-06-12 20:57:45 - starting HEAD tinderbox run for sparc64/sun4v
TB --- 2010-06-12 20:57:45 - cleaning the object tree
TB --- 2010-06-12 20:57:54 - cvsupping the source tree
TB --- 2010-06-12 20:57:54 -
On Sat, Jun 12, 2010 at 07:35:26PM +0200, Dag-Erling Smørgrav wrote:
Bernd Walter ti...@cicely7.cicely.de writes:
I'm not sure when removing a memset is allowed.
Always, if the compiler can determine that the data will not be used
later.
I'm at least sure that the compiler can't if it is
Bernd Walter wrote:
But calling my_abolsutely_not_inlineable_memset should work IMHO.
Try gcc -fno-builtin-memset
___
freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current
To unsubscribe, send any mail to
On Sun, Jun 13, 2010 at 12:52:16AM +0200, Bernd Walter wrote:
I'm at least sure that the compiler can't if it is linked from another
object file.
Is that still true if LTO is enabled?
--
Bruce Cran
___
freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list
In message: 4c13f53f.3050...@freebsd.org
Doug Barton do...@freebsd.org writes:
: On 06/12/10 08:10, M. Warner Losh wrote:
: In message:4c1315f9.6000...@freebsd.org
: Doug Bartondo...@freebsd.org writes:
: : On 06/11/10 14:18, M. Warner Losh wrote:
: : This is building
(from the freebsd-current mailing list)
Dnia 06.06.2010 b. f. bf1...@googlemail.com napisał/a:
Is anybody planning to update the base system heimdal, which has been
largely untouched since May 2008? In addition to the many other
bug-fixes and improvements in the current version 1.3.3 (see,
- Original Message
From: Hans Petter Selasky hsela...@c2i.net
To: PseudoCylon moonlightak...@yahoo.ca
Cc: freebsd-...@freebsd.org; freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Sent: Sat, June 12, 2010 12:30:18 AM
Subject: Re: run(4) patch
On Friday 11 June 2010 08:27:53 PseudoCylon wrote:
Hello,
On 06/12/10 16:16, M. Warner Losh wrote:
I plan on fixing this problem
That's good news, since I'm obviously too stupid to understand why it
exists. :) I look forward to seeing your solution.
Doug
--
... and that's just a little bit of history repeating.
33 matches
Mail list logo
