[head tinderbox] failure on sparc64/sparc64

2010-06-14 Thread FreeBSD Tinderbox
TB --- 2010-06-14 05:21:54 - tinderbox 2.6 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca TB --- 2010-06-14 05:21:54 - starting HEAD tinderbox run for sparc64/sparc64 TB --- 2010-06-14 05:21:54 - cleaning the object tree TB --- 2010-06-14 05:22:03 - cvsupping the source tree TB --- 2010-06-14 05:22:03 -

[head tinderbox] failure on powerpc/powerpc

2010-06-14 Thread FreeBSD Tinderbox
TB --- 2010-06-14 04:54:51 - tinderbox 2.6 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca TB --- 2010-06-14 04:54:51 - starting HEAD tinderbox run for powerpc/powerpc TB --- 2010-06-14 04:54:51 - cleaning the object tree TB --- 2010-06-14 04:55:01 - cvsupping the source tree TB --- 2010-06-14 04:55:01 -

[head tinderbox] failure on sparc64/sun4v

2010-06-14 Thread FreeBSD Tinderbox
TB --- 2010-06-14 05:41:14 - tinderbox 2.6 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca TB --- 2010-06-14 05:41:14 - starting HEAD tinderbox run for sparc64/sun4v TB --- 2010-06-14 05:41:14 - cleaning the object tree TB --- 2010-06-14 05:41:23 - cvsupping the source tree TB --- 2010-06-14 05:41:23 -

Re: Cleanup for cryptographic algorithms vs. compiler optimizations

2010-06-14 Thread Dag-Erling Smørgrav
Bernd Walter ti...@cicely7.cicely.de writes: Dag-Erling Smørgrav d...@des.no writes: Those are freestanding environments, where printf() and puts() don't exist as far as the C standard is concerned. Most controller environments have some kind of libc. They are still freestanding

Re: two buildworld problems

2010-06-14 Thread Alexander Best
On Mon, Jun 14, 2010 at 6:58 AM, Ed Schouten e...@80386.nl wrote: * Alexander Best alexbes...@uni-muenster.de wrote: CC=gcc44 CXX=g++44 CPP=cpp44 As I mentioned before, gcc44 and /usr/local/bin/gcc44 are spelled differently. yes, but the point is: i don't want gcc44 to be used at all

Re: two buildworld problems

2010-06-14 Thread Roman Divacky
On Sun, Jun 13, 2010 at 10:28:23PM +0200, Alexander Best wrote: hi there. i'm experiencing two problems during buildworld. i'm not sure if these are the result of me doing weird stuff or a problem in the src structure: 1. i have the following in my make.conf: .if

Re: wpa_supplicant update? CTRL-EVENT-SCAN-RESULTS

2010-06-14 Thread Ulrich Spörlein
On Sun, 13.06.2010 at 12:03:05 -0700, Rui Paulo wrote: On 13 Jun 2010, at 04:23, Jakub Lach wrote: Hello. Is update of wpa_supplicant planned? Current version in STABLE as well as CURRENT (v0.6.8) is suffering from CTRL-EVENT-SCAN-RESULTS log spam. If it's the same

Re: two buildworld problems

2010-06-14 Thread Alexander Best
On Mon, Jun 14, 2010 at 12:05 PM, Roman Divacky rdiva...@freebsd.org wrote: On Sun, Jun 13, 2010 at 10:28:23PM +0200, Alexander Best wrote: hi there. i'm experiencing two problems during buildworld. i'm not sure if these are the result of me doing weird stuff or a problem in the src structure:

Re: wpa_supplicant update? CTRL-EVENT-SCAN-RESULTS

2010-06-14 Thread Rui Paulo
On 14 Jun 2010, at 03:11, Ulrich Spörlein wrote: On Sun, 13.06.2010 at 12:03:05 -0700, Rui Paulo wrote: On 13 Jun 2010, at 04:23, Jakub Lach wrote: Hello. Is update of wpa_supplicant planned? Current version in STABLE as well as CURRENT (v0.6.8) is suffering from

Dell bluetooth wireless card

2010-06-14 Thread Raoul
Hello all, Please, can you tell me what to do to make my bluetooth card detected on current. It is a Dell Wireless 370 Bluetooth Mini-card, running on a Dell E6400 laptop. OS: FBSD current r208665. Thanks in advance. Raoul rm...@free.fr ___

Re: nvidia-driver 195.22 use horribly broken on amd64 between r206173 and

2010-06-14 Thread John Baldwin
On Sunday 13 June 2010 11:23:07 pm Doug Barton wrote: On 06/13/10 19:09, Alan Cox wrote: On Sun, Jun 13, 2010 at 8:38 PM, Doug Bartondo...@freebsd.org wrote: On 06/01/10 08:26, John Baldwin wrote: I've asked the driver author if the calls to vm_page_wire() and vm_page_unwire() can

Re: two buildworld problems

2010-06-14 Thread Anonymous
Alexander Best alexbes...@uni-muenster.de writes: On Mon, Jun 14, 2010 at 12:05 PM, Roman Divacky rdiva...@freebsd.org wrote: On Sun, Jun 13, 2010 at 10:28:23PM +0200, Alexander Best wrote: hi there. i'm experiencing two problems during buildworld. i'm not sure if these are the result of me

[head tinderbox] failure on arm/arm

2010-06-14 Thread FreeBSD Tinderbox
TB --- 2010-06-14 13:50:00 - tinderbox 2.6 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca TB --- 2010-06-14 13:50:00 - starting HEAD tinderbox run for arm/arm TB --- 2010-06-14 13:50:00 - cleaning the object tree TB --- 2010-06-14 13:50:16 - cvsupping the source tree TB --- 2010-06-14 13:50:16 -

Re: nvidia-driver 195.22 use horribly broken on amd64 between r206173 and

2010-06-14 Thread Christian Zander
On Mon, Jun 14, 2010 at 05:48:55AM -0700, John Baldwin wrote: (...) I've asked the driver author if the calls to vm_page_wire() and vm_page_unwire() can simply be removed but have not heard back yet. Is there any news on this? I have updated to the latest current so I'm

Re: CALL for TEST [HOSTAP] run(4) ralink usb wireless

2010-06-14 Thread Ganbold
AK-san, PseudoCylon wrote: - Original Message From: Ganbold ganb...@gmail.com To: PseudoCylon moonlightak...@yahoo.ca Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org; Ganbold Tsagaankhuu ganb...@mobicom.mn Sent: Thu, June 10, 2010 10:53:30 AM Subject: Re: CALL for TEST [HOSTAP] run(4) ralink

ZFS LORs: syncer vs. zfs and devfs vs. zfs

2010-06-14 Thread Bruce Cran
I got the attached ZFS LORs when building ports on a new install of 9.0-CURRENT-20100610-JPSNAP. I know there have been some ZFS checkins in the last few days so I don't know if they've already been fixed? -- Bruce lock order reversal: 1st 0xff000a846458 zfs (zfs) @

Re: Cleanup for cryptographic algorithms vs. compiler optimizations

2010-06-14 Thread Tijl Coosemans
On Friday 11 June 2010 23:31:57 Dag-Erling Smørgrav wrote: Tijl Coosemans t...@coosemans.org writes: Dag-Erling Smørgrav d...@des.no writes: #define FORCE_ASSIGN(type, var, value) \ *(volatile type *)(var) = (value) memset can be optimised away as well. The only way is to declare

[head tinderbox] failure on sparc64/sparc64

2010-06-14 Thread FreeBSD Tinderbox
TB --- 2010-06-14 16:41:38 - tinderbox 2.6 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca TB --- 2010-06-14 16:41:38 - starting HEAD tinderbox run for sparc64/sparc64 TB --- 2010-06-14 16:41:38 - cleaning the object tree TB --- 2010-06-14 16:41:47 - cvsupping the source tree TB --- 2010-06-14 16:41:47 -

[head tinderbox] failure on powerpc/powerpc

2010-06-14 Thread FreeBSD Tinderbox
TB --- 2010-06-14 16:34:51 - tinderbox 2.6 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca TB --- 2010-06-14 16:34:51 - starting HEAD tinderbox run for powerpc/powerpc TB --- 2010-06-14 16:34:51 - cleaning the object tree TB --- 2010-06-14 16:35:02 - cvsupping the source tree TB --- 2010-06-14 16:35:02 -

[head tinderbox] failure on sparc64/sun4v

2010-06-14 Thread FreeBSD Tinderbox
TB --- 2010-06-14 17:15:01 - tinderbox 2.6 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca TB --- 2010-06-14 17:15:01 - starting HEAD tinderbox run for sparc64/sun4v TB --- 2010-06-14 17:15:01 - cleaning the object tree TB --- 2010-06-14 17:15:10 - cvsupping the source tree TB --- 2010-06-14 17:15:10 -

Re: Dell bluetooth wireless card

2010-06-14 Thread Tobias Lott
On Mon, 14 Jun 2010 15:25:14 +0200 Raoul rm...@free.fr wrote: Hello all, Please, can you tell me what to do to make my bluetooth card detected on current. It is a Dell Wireless 370 Bluetooth Mini-card, running on a Dell E6400 laptop. OS: FBSD current r208665. Thanks in advance.

Re: ZFS LORs: syncer vs. zfs and devfs vs. zfs

2010-06-14 Thread Kostik Belousov
On Mon, Jun 14, 2010 at 05:00:00PM +, Bruce Cran wrote: I got the attached ZFS LORs when building ports on a new install of 9.0-CURRENT-20100610-JPSNAP. I know there have been some ZFS checkins in the last few days so I don't know if they've already been fixed? The LORs are not specific

Re: two buildworld problems

2010-06-14 Thread Alexander Best
On Mon, Jun 14, 2010 at 4:17 PM, Anonymous swel...@gmail.com wrote: Alexander Best alexbes...@uni-muenster.de writes: On Mon, Jun 14, 2010 at 12:05 PM, Roman Divacky rdiva...@freebsd.org wrote: On Sun, Jun 13, 2010 at 10:28:23PM +0200, Alexander Best wrote: hi there. i'm experiencing two

Re: Dell bluetooth wireless card

2010-06-14 Thread Raoul
On Mon, 14 Jun 2010 20:31:52 +0200 Tobias Lott tl...@ebel-syste.ms wrote: On Mon, 14 Jun 2010 15:25:14 +0200 Raoul rm...@free.fr wrote: Hello all, Please, can you tell me what to do to make my bluetooth card detected on current. It is a Dell Wireless 370 Bluetooth Mini-card,

Re: two buildworld problems

2010-06-14 Thread Dag-Erling Smørgrav
Alexander Best alexbes...@uni-muenster.de writes: .if empty(.CURDIR:M/usr/src/*) empty(.CURDIR:M/usr/obj/*) exists(/usr/local/bin/gcc44) CC = gcc44 CXX = g++44 CPP = cpp44 .endif What happens when .CURDIR = /usr/src? DES -- Dag-Erling Smørgrav - d...@des.no

Re: RFC: etcupdate tool in base?

2010-06-14 Thread Garrett Cooper
On Thu, Jun 10, 2010 at 10:46 AM, John Baldwin j...@freebsd.org wrote: I've had several folks ask me recently about importing etcupdate (http://www.FreeBSD.org/~jhb/etcupdate) into the base system as an alternate tool for updating /etc during upgrades.  Do folks have any strong objections to

[patch] Misc warnings found by clang.

2010-06-14 Thread Pawel Worach
Here is a patch that fixes a couple of warning: format string is not a string literal and a couple of unused/never read variable len warnings in lib/libugidfw. http://pes.vlakno.cz/~pwo/clang-warn-fix-head.diff Regards -- Pawel ___

Re: Multiple stability issues with r208557, r208809 on amd64

2010-06-14 Thread Garrett Cooper
On Tue, Jun 8, 2010 at 5:37 PM, Garrett Cooper yanef...@gmail.com wrote: On Tue, Jun 8, 2010 at 4:59 PM, Xin LI delp...@gmail.com wrote: Do you mean between the two revisions or something?  I committed r208557 which doesn't seem likely to cause any runtime issue; 208809 is isp(4) change which

Re: [patch] Misc warnings found by clang.

2010-06-14 Thread Max Laier
On Monday 14 June 2010 23:22:42 Pawel Worach wrote: Here is a patch that fixes a couple of warning: format string is not a string literal and a couple of unused/never read variable len warnings in lib/libugidfw. I'm not sure about the intention behind the len assignements in libugidfw - might

Re: two buildworld problems

2010-06-14 Thread Alexander Best
2010/6/14 Dag-Erling Smørgrav d...@des.no: Alexander Best alexbes...@uni-muenster.de writes: .if empty(.CURDIR:M/usr/src/*) empty(.CURDIR:M/usr/obj/*) exists(/usr/local/bin/gcc44) CC = gcc44 CXX = g++44 CPP = cpp44 .endif What happens when .CURDIR = /usr/src? i'm now using .if

[CFT] BSDL iconv in base system

2010-06-14 Thread Gabor Kovesdan
Hello Folks, during the last summer, Google generously founded my Summer of Code project, which was providing a BSD-licensed iconv implementation for FreeBSD. I'm proud to announce that the work has been completed and a patch is available to add it to the base system. The results of this

Re: [CFT] BSDL iconv in base system

2010-06-14 Thread Brandon Gooch
On Mon, Jun 14, 2010 at 7:13 PM, Gabor Kovesdan ga...@freebsd.org wrote: Hello Folks, during the last summer, Google generously founded my Summer of Code project, which was providing a BSD-licensed iconv implementation for FreeBSD. I'm proud to announce that the work has been completed and a

Re: nvidia-driver 195.22 use horribly broken on amd64 between r206173 and

2010-06-14 Thread Doug Barton
On 06/14/10 14:30, Rene Ladan wrote: On 14-06-2010 14:48, John Baldwin wrote: On Sunday 13 June 2010 11:23:07 pm Doug Barton wrote: On 06/13/10 19:09, Alan Cox wrote: On Sun, Jun 13, 2010 at 8:38 PM, Doug Bartondo...@freebsd.org wrote: On 06/01/10 08:26, John Baldwin wrote: I've asked

Re: [CFT] BSDL iconv in base system

2010-06-14 Thread Anonymous
Gabor Kovesdan ga...@freebsd.org writes: [...] The rather big patch (42,5M) is available here: http://www.kovesdan.org/patches/iconv_base_integrate.diff Why not compress it with gzip(1) or xz(1)? Any comments, suggestions or bugreports are very welcome.

Re: nvidia-driver 195.22 use horribly broken on amd64 between r206173 and

2010-06-14 Thread Rene Ladan
On 14-06-2010 14:48, John Baldwin wrote: On Sunday 13 June 2010 11:23:07 pm Doug Barton wrote: On 06/13/10 19:09, Alan Cox wrote: On Sun, Jun 13, 2010 at 8:38 PM, Doug Bartondo...@freebsd.org wrote: On 06/01/10 08:26, John Baldwin wrote: I've asked the driver author if the calls to

Re: nvidia-driver 195.22 use horribly broken on amd64 between r206173 and

2010-06-14 Thread Christian Zander
On Mon, Jun 14, 2010 at 02:30:03PM -0700, Rene Ladan wrote: (...) I've asked the driver author if the calls to vm_page_wire() and vm_page_unwire() can simply be removed but have not heard back yet. Is there any news on this? I have updated to the latest current so I'm running the nv

Re: nvidia-driver 195.22 use horribly broken on amd64 between r206173 and

2010-06-14 Thread Garrett Cooper
On Mon, Jun 14, 2010 at 2:31 PM, Christian Zander czan...@nvidia.com wrote: On Mon, Jun 14, 2010 at 02:30:03PM -0700, Rene Ladan wrote: (...) I've asked the driver author if the calls to vm_page_wire() and vm_page_unwire() can simply be removed but have not heard back yet. Is there any

Re: nvidia-driver 195.22 use horribly broken on amd64 between r206173 and

2010-06-14 Thread Doug Barton
On 06/14/10 19:14, Doug Barton wrote: Details, I'm running today's -current (r209174) and I've had it up for 4.5 hours already, which is 3 hours longer than I was able to run with anything 195.22 for months. I've done full normal use which includes lots of terminals, tbird, firefox, flash, etc.