On Thu, Aug 26, 2010 at 05:50:01PM -0700, Xin LI wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA256
>
> Hi,
>
> The attached patch changes FreeBSD/x86 back to FreeBSD/i386 on i386 and
> FreeBSD/amd64 on amd64.
>
> Comments welcome! I'll commit it in by the weekend if there is no
> objec
On Fri, Aug 27, 2010 at 12:07:11PM +0800, 崔岩ccuiy...@gmail.com wrote:
> A quick question about the FreeBSD. In my lab, there is a multicore
> machine and i install a FreeBSD
> system on it. I wonder to know how to see the utilization for each
> core? are there such tools? Thanks!
Try $ t
On 27 August 2010 01:09, Xin LI wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA256
>
> On 2010/08/26 13:09, Doug Barton wrote:
>> On 08/26/2010 12:53 PM, pluknet wrote:
>>> [cc'ing current@ as rc@ looks too quite]
>>>
>>> Hi.
>>>
>>> Since ifconfig has grown to label interfaces with
>>> if
On 27 August 2010 00:09, Doug Barton wrote:
> On 08/26/2010 12:53 PM, pluknet wrote:
>>
>> [cc'ing current@ as rc@ looks too quite]
>>
>> Hi.
>>
>> Since ifconfig has grown to label interfaces with
>> ifconfig $ifname description "foobar", what about
>> to give it more life and store i/face descri
on 23/08/2010 11:43 Doug Barton said the following:
> Ok, so it seems that you're suggesting to disable throttling, so I added the
> following to /boot/loader.conf:
>
> hint.p4tcc.0.disabled="1"
> hint.p4tcc.1.disabled="1"
> hint.acpi_throttle.0.disabled="1"
> hint.acpi_throttle.1.disabled="1"
>
On Fri Aug 27 10, Kostik Belousov wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 26, 2010 at 05:50:01PM -0700, Xin LI wrote:
> > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> > Hash: SHA256
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > The attached patch changes FreeBSD/x86 back to FreeBSD/i386 on i386 and
> > FreeBSD/amd64 on amd64.
> >
> > Comments welc
On Fri Aug 27 10, Alexander Best wrote:
> On Fri Aug 27 10, Kostik Belousov wrote:
> > On Thu, Aug 26, 2010 at 05:50:01PM -0700, Xin LI wrote:
> > > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> > > Hash: SHA256
> > >
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > The attached patch changes FreeBSD/x86 back to FreeBSD/i386 on i38
On Thursday, August 26, 2010 8:50:01 pm Xin LI wrote:
> Hi,
>
> The attached patch changes FreeBSD/x86 back to FreeBSD/i386 on i386 and
> FreeBSD/amd64 on amd64.
>
> Comments welcome! I'll commit it in by the weekend if there is no
> objection on this.
As others have noted, the 'x86' is on purp
The recent lib/libc/stdlib/atexit.c changes broke emacs (23.2_2,2) for me.
It aborts on exit (C-x C-c) after receiving SIGBUS:
f...@r500 ~ $gdb emacs
GNU gdb 6.1.1 [FreeBSD]
Copyright 2004 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
GDB is free software, covered by the GNU General Public License, and you are
w
On 08/27/2010 03:25 AM, Andriy Gapon wrote:
on 23/08/2010 11:43 Doug Barton said the following:
Ok, so it seems that you're suggesting to disable throttling, so I added the
following to /boot/loader.conf:
hint.p4tcc.0.disabled="1"
hint.p4tcc.1.disabled="1"
hint.acpi_throttle.0.disabled="1"
hint
On 8/26/10 10:10 PM, Steve Kargl wrote:
On Fri, Aug 27, 2010 at 12:07:11PM +0800, ccuiy...@gmail.com wrote:
Dear all:
A quick question about the FreeBSD. In my lab, there is a multicore
machine and i install a FreeBSD
system on it. I wonder to know how to see the utilization for
on 27/08/2010 19:19 Doug Barton said the following:
> Yes, it improved things greatly. I first ran with just powerd for several
> hours
> and that worked fine. The next day I was able to use powerd and cx_lowest=C2
> for
> the better part of a day (including watching a few flash videos). By the e
On 08/27/2010 10:12 AM, Andriy Gapon wrote:
Cool!
Meanwhile can you double-check what timers does Linux use there?
(No idea how to do that, especially if it's NO_HZ kernel).
Sure, if someone can tell me what to do. I know even less about linux
than I do about freebsd. :) First thing that came
On Fri, Aug 27, 2010 at 9:45 AM, Julian Elischer wrote:
> On 8/26/10 10:10 PM, Steve Kargl wrote:
>> On Fri, Aug 27, 2010 at 12:07:11PM +0800, ccuiy...@gmail.com wrote:
>>>
>>> Dear all:
>>>
>>> A quick question about the FreeBSD. In my lab, there is a multicore
>>> machine and i install
Hi,
Try using htop from the ports.
--
Love & Light
Ventsislav Nikolov
On Fri, Aug 27, 2010 at 7:07 AM, 崔岩ccuiy...@gmail.com wrote:
> Dear all:
>
> A quick question about the FreeBSD. In my lab, there is a multicore
> machine and i install a FreeBSD
> system on it.
Freddie Cash wrote:
Also, try man top.
-C will show stats for individual CPUs at the top of the screen
(similar to pressing 0 in top on Linux). This was added to top in 7.2
or 7.3 or thereabouts.
You mean top -P
--
Volker T. Mueller
Continum AG
Bismarckallee 7d
79098 Freiburg i. Br.
Tel. +49
On 08/27/2010 12:21, Fabian Keil wrote:
> The recent lib/libc/stdlib/atexit.c changes broke emacs (23.2_2,2) for me.
> It aborts on exit (C-x C-c) after receiving SIGBUS:
>
r211704 was just a style(9) fix and should coincide with cvs/1.10 that
your talking about. r211706 or cvs/1.11 is the culpri
On Fri, Aug 27, 2010 at 11:05 AM, V. T. Mueller, Continum
wrote:
> Freddie Cash wrote:
Also, try man top.
>>
>> -C will show stats for individual CPUs at the top of the screen
>> (similar to pressing 0 in top on Linux). This was added to top in 7.2
>> or 7.3 or thereabouts.
>
> You mean
On Fri, Aug 27, 2010 at 06:21:08PM +0200, Fabian Keil wrote:
> The recent lib/libc/stdlib/atexit.c changes broke emacs (23.2_2,2) for me.
> It aborts on exit (C-x C-c) after receiving SIGBUS:
>
> f...@r500 ~ $gdb emacs
> GNU gdb 6.1.1 [FreeBSD]
> Copyright 2004 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
> GDB
Kostik Belousov wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 27, 2010 at 06:21:08PM +0200, Fabian Keil wrote:
> > The recent lib/libc/stdlib/atexit.c changes broke emacs (23.2_2,2) for
> > me. It aborts on exit (C-x C-c) after receiving SIGBUS:
> >
> > f...@r500 ~ $gdb emacs
> > GNU gdb 6.1.1 [FreeBSD]
> > Copyright 20
Installed a kernel based on yesterday's src/ tree.
The kernel panicked and the generated core seems
to be corrupt. Is there a known issue with getting
core dumps on x86_64 freebsd? The top of the
core.txt.0 file shows
troutmask.apl.washington.edu dumped core - see /usr/tmp/vmcore.0
Fri Aug 27
On Fri, Aug 27, 2010 at 09:25:34PM +0200, Fabian Keil wrote:
> Kostik Belousov wrote:
>
> > On Fri, Aug 27, 2010 at 06:21:08PM +0200, Fabian Keil wrote:
> > > The recent lib/libc/stdlib/atexit.c changes broke emacs (23.2_2,2) for
> > > me. It aborts on exit (C-x C-c) after receiving SIGBUS:
> > >
Kostik Belousov wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 27, 2010 at 09:25:34PM +0200, Fabian Keil wrote:
> > Kostik Belousov wrote:
> >
> > > On Fri, Aug 27, 2010 at 06:21:08PM +0200, Fabian Keil wrote:
> > > > The recent lib/libc/stdlib/atexit.c changes broke emacs (23.2_2,2) for
> > > > me. It aborts on exit (C
On Fri, Aug 27, 2010 at 09:46:35PM +0200, Fabian Keil wrote:
> > diff --git a/lib/libc/stdlib/atexit.c b/lib/libc/stdlib/atexit.c
> > index 97cf234..511172a 100644
> > --- a/lib/libc/stdlib/atexit.c
> > +++ b/lib/libc/stdlib/atexit.c
> > @@ -200,6 +200,6 @@ __cxa_finalize(void *dso)
> > if (dso
2010/8/24 Martin Matuska :
> Dear FreeBSD community,
>
> in my last CFT I presented a patch that improves ZFS write speed. There
> have been easily portable improvements on the read side in OpenSolaris,
> too. Of course, the improvement here is by far not that dramatic as in
> the zfs_metaslab.patc
On Sun, Aug 22, 2010 at 12:26 PM, Martin Matuska wrote:
> Thank you, I have updated the v15 patch for 8-STABLE.
I have been running your patch for a couple days now and no issues.
Nice work!
Scott
___
freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list
http://l
TB --- 2010-08-27 20:41:32 - tinderbox 2.6 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca
TB --- 2010-08-27 20:41:32 - starting HEAD tinderbox run for powerpc64/powerpc
TB --- 2010-08-27 20:41:32 - cleaning the object tree
TB --- 2010-08-27 20:41:48 - cvsupping the source tree
TB --- 2010-08-27 20:41:48 - /u
Hi mm.
On Fri, 27 Aug 2010 16:05:00 -0400
Scott Ullrich wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 22, 2010 at 12:26 PM, Martin Matuska wrote:
> > Thank you, I have updated the v15 patch for 8-STABLE.
> I have been running your patch for a couple days now and no issues.
> Nice work!
Yes, me too. I'll try t
Another "me too" here.
8-stable/amd64 + v15 (zpool still uses v14) + metaslab +
abe_stat_rrwlock + A.Gapon's vm_paging_needed() + uma defrag patches.
The box survived few days of pounding on it without any signs of trouble.
--Artem
On Fri, Aug 27, 2010 at 4:19 PM, Norikatsu Shigemura wrote:
On 08/27/2010 19:50, Artem Belevich wrote:
> Another "me too" here.
>
> 8-stable/amd64 + v15 (zpool still uses v14) + metaslab +
> abe_stat_rrwlock + A.Gapon's vm_paging_needed() + uma defrag patches.
>
> The box survived few days of pounding on it without any signs of trouble.
>
I must
On Fri, Aug 27, 2010 at 6:24 PM, jhell wrote:
> On 08/27/2010 19:50, Artem Belevich wrote:
>> Another "me too" here.
>>
>> 8-stable/amd64 + v15 (zpool still uses v14) + metaslab +
>> abe_stat_rrwlock + A.Gapon's vm_paging_needed() + uma defrag patches.
>>
>> The box survived few days of pounding o
31 matches
Mail list logo
