So you're saying -head is better, right?
Adrian
On 9 March 2011 15:35, Urankar Mikael mikael.uran...@ujf-grenoble.frwrote:
Here are some dumb benchmarks through ftp :
with 8.2R RX rate is 2400kBps and TX rate is 810KBps
on a 9-CURRENT RX rate is 2700kBps and TX rate is 2700kBps
More info
Woo. That's great news. On a non-11n card too. Excellent!
adrian
On 9 March 2011 17:12, Urankar Mikael mikael.uran...@ujf-grenoble.frwrote:
Yes !
On Wed 09 March 2011 at 04:58:50PM +0800, Adrian Chadd wrote:
So you're saying -head is better, right?
On 9 March 2011 15:35, Urankar
On Tuesday, March 08, 2011 3:52:12 pm Roman Divacky wrote:
On Tue, Mar 08, 2011 at 09:19:31PM +0100, Fabian Keil wrote:
Roman Divacky rdiva...@freebsd.org wrote:
this diet patch
http://lev.vlakno.cz/~rdivacky/boot2-final-diet.patch
includes these changes:
Hi,
I was just caught with a kernel that wouldn't compile when I added USB
double-bulk pipes (device udbp). A quick google search found that I needed to
add options NETGRAPH to the kernel file.
No biggie, but I see this has been catching people since 2005
I have prepared a patch that finishes the core2 support part and
backports from gcc-4.3
the SSSE3 instruction set (-mssse3, -mno-ssse3).
It is enabled for -march=core2 by default.
Testing and comments are welcome.
Patch:
http://people.freebsd.org/~mm/patches/head-gcc-ssse3.patch
The backport
On 3/9/11 5:47 AM, Chris Forgeron wrote:
Hi,
I was just caught with a kernel that wouldn't compile when I added USB double-bulk
pipes (device udbp). A quick google search found that I needed to add options
NETGRAPH to the kernel file.
No biggie, but I see this has been catching people since
2011/3/9 Pierre Beyssac p...@fasterix.frmug.org:
On Tue, Mar 08, 2011 at 07:40:19PM +0100, Pawel Jakub Dawidek wrote:
Since I upgraded to ZFS v28 I noticed missing files from NFS. The
files are still accessible through NFS but they don't show up on a
readdir(3).
Could you try r219404?
I have prepared a patch that finishes the core2 support part and
backports from gcc-4.3
the SSSE3 instruction set (-mssse3, -mno-ssse3).
It is enabled for -march=core2 by default.
Testing and comments are welcome.
Patch:
http://people.freebsd.org/~mm/patches/head-gcc-ssse3.patch
The
On Wed, Mar 9, 2011 at 9:49 AM, George Liaskos geo.lias...@gmail.comwrote:
I have prepared a patch that finishes the core2 support part and
backports from gcc-4.3
the SSSE3 instruction set (-mssse3, -mno-ssse3).
It is enabled for -march=core2 by default.
Testing and comments are
On Wed, Mar 09, 2011, Martin Matuska wrote:
I have prepared a patch that finishes the core2 support part and
backports from gcc-4.3
the SSSE3 instruction set (-mssse3, -mno-ssse3).
It is enabled for -march=core2 by default.
Testing and comments are welcome.
Patch:
On 2011-03-09 14:23, John Baldwin wrote:
gcc nor clang emits any code to initialize static type foo = 0;
because it's expected that BSS is zeroed, which is not the case
in boot2 so we have to initialize that explicitly
It used to be that if you explicitly initialized a variable to 0, it was
On 2011-03-09 22:18, David Schultz wrote:
The proliferation of -mno-sse -mno-sse2 -mno-sse3 options in the
makefiles is probably not needed: I'm pretty sure -mno-sse implies
the other two, unless -msse3 is specified explicitly.
Indeed, contrib/gcc/config/i386/i386.c has:
static bool
Hi,
We are interested in realtime application and CPU affinity.
After googling pthread_setaffinity_np, I have found that it appeared in 7.2.
But I cannot find it by man command.
Does anyone know the status of CPU affinity function in FreeBSD or
useful links about it?
I have found the pointer
On Thu, Mar 10, 2011 at 11:56:22AM +0900, Hideki Yamamoto wrote:
Hi,
We are interested in realtime application and CPU affinity.
After googling pthread_setaffinity_np, I have found that it appeared in 7.2.
But I cannot find it by man command.
Does anyone know the status of CPU affinity
14 matches
Mail list logo
