On Tuesday 05 April 2011 18:45:51 Andriy Gapon wrote:
on 05/04/2011 15:55 Hans Petter Selasky said the following:
On Tuesday 05 April 2011 14:50:43 Andriy Gapon wrote:
I believe that newbus already supports ordering of children on a bus.
BTW, does USB have to pass anything from probe to
On Tue, Apr 05, 2011 at 06:16:01PM -0700, Julian Elischer wrote:
I was just looking in the thread creation code after most of a decade
NOT looking at it..
boy we really need to go through there with a broom.. the cobwebs are
getting thick.
Like we always call the code to put an upcall,
When racing two workloads, one doing
zfs recv -v -d testpool
and the other
find /testpool -type f -print0 | xargs -0 sha1
I can (seemingly reliably) trigger this panic:
panic: Lock buf_hash_table.ht_locks[i].ht_lock not exclusively locked @
On Monday, April 04, 2011 5:10:20 pm Ryan Stone wrote:
I'm running into a bootup crash under sched_4bsd on HEAD. The crash
happens when I have a thread bound to a single CPU that isn't the BSP,
and that thread is scheduled. If the AP that the thread is bound
hasn't been started up,
On Monday, April 04, 2011 9:04:23 pm Justin Hibbits wrote:
On Apr 4, 2011, at 6:57 PM, Julian Elischer wrote:
is there anyone here with enough gdb/kgdb source experience to know
what
we would need to put on the stack at fork_exit() to make it stop
when it
gets there?
not only is
On Tuesday, April 05, 2011 4:35:44 pm Navdeep Parhar wrote:
On Tue, Apr 5, 2011 at 1:33 PM, Julian Elischer jul...@freebsd.org wrote:
On 4/4/11 6:04 PM, Justin Hibbits wrote:
On Apr 4, 2011, at 6:57 PM, Julian Elischer wrote:
is there anyone here with enough gdb/kgdb source experience
On Wednesday, April 06, 2011 3:33:47 am Hans Petter Selasky wrote:
On Tuesday 05 April 2011 18:45:51 Andriy Gapon wrote:
on 05/04/2011 15:55 Hans Petter Selasky said the following:
On Tuesday 05 April 2011 14:50:43 Andriy Gapon wrote:
I believe that newbus already supports ordering of
on 06/04/2011 10:33 Hans Petter Selasky said the following:
After looking at subr_usb.c I see your solution is fine as long as the
PROBE()
method that it attaches is the last one called before ATTACH(). If this is
documented in how newbus should function, then please go ahead updating your
On Wednesday 06 April 2011 15:21:19 Andriy Gapon wrote:
on 06/04/2011 10:33 Hans Petter Selasky said the following:
Which drivers I have missed?
Thanks!
Run a kernel test compile including all modules. If that's OK it should be
fine.
--HPS
___
on 06/04/2011 16:28 Hans Petter Selasky said the following:
On Wednesday 06 April 2011 15:21:19 Andriy Gapon wrote:
on 06/04/2011 10:33 Hans Petter Selasky said the following:
Which drivers I have missed?
Thanks!
Run a kernel test compile including all modules. If that's OK it should be
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
It seem that CVS hasn't seen any src updates sine the burp involving
/usr/ports/net/unison232/files/patch-update.mli.diff.
Any ideas?
imb
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (FreeBSD)
Quoting Kostik Belousov kostik...@gmail.com (from Wed, 6 Apr 2011
13:21:43 +0300):
On Tue, Apr 05, 2011 at 06:16:01PM -0700, Julian Elischer wrote:
I was just looking in the thread creation code after most of a decade
NOT looking at it..
boy we really need to go through there with a broom..
On Wed, Apr 6, 2011 at 8:36 AM, John Baldwin j...@freebsd.org wrote:
Hummm. Patching 4BSD to use the same route as ULE may be the best solution
for now if that is easiest. Alternatively, you could change 4BSD's
sched_add() to not try to kick other CPUs until smp_started is true.
At first I
On 4/6/11 3:21 AM, Kostik Belousov wrote:
On Tue, Apr 05, 2011 at 06:16:01PM -0700, Julian Elischer wrote:
I was just looking in the thread creation code after most of a decade
NOT looking at it..
boy we really need to go through there with a broom.. the cobwebs are
getting thick.
Like we
On 4/6/11 5:45 AM, John Baldwin wrote:
On Tuesday, April 05, 2011 4:35:44 pm Navdeep Parhar wrote:
On Tue, Apr 5, 2011 at 1:33 PM, Julian Elischerjul...@freebsd.org wrote:
On 4/4/11 6:04 PM, Justin Hibbits wrote:
What does ddb do? It always seems to get this stuff correct.
ddb knows to
2011/4/6 Ryan Stone ryst...@gmail.com:
On Wed, Apr 6, 2011 at 8:36 AM, John Baldwin j...@freebsd.org wrote:
Hummm. Patching 4BSD to use the same route as ULE may be the best solution
for now if that is easiest. Alternatively, you could change 4BSD's
sched_add() to not try to kick other CPUs
John Baldwin wrote:
On Monday, April 04, 2011 4:43:16 pm Alexander Best wrote:
On Fri Apr 1 11, John Baldwin wrote:
This is probably due to the hard drives being IDE (really ATA) rather than
SCSI. I agree this should show the pass devices.
h...one could argue. the drives are ATA,
On Wednesday, April 06, 2011 1:08:20 pm Ryan Stone wrote:
On Wed, Apr 6, 2011 at 8:36 AM, John Baldwin j...@freebsd.org wrote:
Hummm. Patching 4BSD to use the same route as ULE may be the best
solution
for now if that is easiest. Alternatively, you could change 4BSD's
sched_add() to not
On Wed, Apr 06, 2011 at 10:14:21AM -0700, Julian Elischer wrote:
On 4/6/11 3:21 AM, Kostik Belousov wrote:
On Tue, Apr 05, 2011 at 06:16:01PM -0700, Julian Elischer wrote:
I was just looking in the thread creation code after most of a decade
NOT looking at it..
boy we really need to go
On 4/6/11 10:17 AM, Julian Elischer wrote:
On 4/6/11 5:45 AM, John Baldwin wrote:
On Tuesday, April 05, 2011 4:35:44 pm Navdeep Parhar wrote:
On Tue, Apr 5, 2011 at 1:33 PM, Julian
Elischerjul...@freebsd.org wrote:
On 4/4/11 6:04 PM, Justin Hibbits wrote:
What does ddb do? It always seems
20 matches
Mail list logo
