On 2011-04-25 21:53, Doug Barton wrote:
In my /usr/obj (on amd64) I have 2 directories; lib32, and the root of
the fs where the sources are. It seems odd to me that lib32 is not under
the same root as everything else, so I'm asking why. :)
If you look under /usr/obj/lib32, you will see the
TB --- 2011-04-26 06:31:03 - tinderbox 2.6 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca
TB --- 2011-04-26 06:31:03 - starting HEAD tinderbox run for mips/mips
TB --- 2011-04-26 06:31:03 - cleaning the object tree
TB --- 2011-04-26 06:31:10 - cvsupping the source tree
TB --- 2011-04-26 06:31:10 -
Hello,
I'm trying to compile /usr/ports/mail/evolution-exchange/ and the gcc
crashes with:
[root@vm-9Current /usr/ports/mail/evolution-exchange]# LANG=C make
=== Building for evolution-exchange-2.32.1_1
gmake all-recursive
gmake[1]: Entering directory
TB --- 2011-04-26 07:07:19 - tinderbox 2.6 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca
TB --- 2011-04-26 07:07:19 - starting HEAD tinderbox run for sparc64/sparc64
TB --- 2011-04-26 07:07:19 - cleaning the object tree
TB --- 2011-04-26 07:07:36 - cvsupping the source tree
TB --- 2011-04-26 07:07:36 -
TB --- 2011-04-26 07:25:05 - tinderbox 2.6 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca
TB --- 2011-04-26 07:25:05 - starting HEAD tinderbox run for sparc64/sun4v
TB --- 2011-04-26 07:25:05 - cleaning the object tree
TB --- 2011-04-26 07:25:15 - cvsupping the source tree
TB --- 2011-04-26 07:25:15 -
Hello.
Don't know is this related.
I've got rather fresh 9.0-CURRENT (checked out few days ago) built with clang.
And I use clang as the system compiler, but ruby fails to build with clang. So
I've tried gcc. But with gcc I've got this:
..
configure:3211: checking whether the C compiler works
El día Tuesday, April 26, 2011 a las 10:22:21AM +0100, David Woodhouse escribió:
crash, i.e. it is *not* the typical hardware related crash;
- the above mentioned version evolution-exchange-2.32.1_1 is a fake, in
real it is compiling the original evolution-exchange-2.32.3 sources;
-
TB --- 2011-04-26 09:30:00 - tinderbox 2.6 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca
TB --- 2011-04-26 09:30:00 - starting HEAD tinderbox run for arm/arm
TB --- 2011-04-26 09:30:00 - cleaning the object tree
TB --- 2011-04-26 09:30:09 - cvsupping the source tree
TB --- 2011-04-26 09:30:09 -
On Mon Apr 25 11, Steve Wills wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
I've noticed lately that when doing heavy IO, my 9-CURRENT system (Fri
Apr 15 23:33:46 EDT 2011) is quite unresponsive. I have two ZFS mirrors
setup and run KDE4. The system has 12GB of RAM.
When I,
On Tue, 2011-04-26 at 10:04 +0200, Matthias Apitz wrote:
Hello,
I'm trying to compile /usr/ports/mail/evolution-exchange/ and the gcc
crashes with:
[root@vm-9Current /usr/ports/mail/evolution-exchange]# LANG=C make
=== Building for evolution-exchange-2.32.1_1
gmake all-recursive
On Tue, 2011-04-26 at 11:51 +0200, Matthias Apitz wrote:
I need the evolution-exchange connector;
That's for Exchange 2003, right? If you were on a newer version of
Exchange perhaps you'd be able to use the new Evolution-EWS connector.
can I live with 2.32.1 while evolution and its dataserver
TB --- 2011-04-26 10:18:57 - tinderbox 2.6 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca
TB --- 2011-04-26 10:18:57 - starting HEAD tinderbox run for ia64/ia64
TB --- 2011-04-26 10:18:57 - cleaning the object tree
TB --- 2011-04-26 10:19:08 - cvsupping the source tree
TB --- 2011-04-26 10:19:08 -
Since today's source (FreeBSD 9.0-CURRENT/amd64 (source is: Revision:
221060) update I get the follwoing error while building the kernel
(options NFSD/options NFSCL instead of options NFSSERVER/options NFSCLIENT):
cc -c -O2 -frename-registers -pipe -fno-strict-aliasing -march=native
-std=c99
TB --- 2011-04-26 11:34:53 - tinderbox 2.6 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca
TB --- 2011-04-26 11:34:53 - starting HEAD tinderbox run for mips/mips
TB --- 2011-04-26 11:34:53 - cleaning the object tree
TB --- 2011-04-26 11:35:01 - cvsupping the source tree
TB --- 2011-04-26 11:35:01 -
Since today's source (FreeBSD 9.0-CURRENT/amd64 (source is: Revision:
221060) update I get the follwoing error while building the kernel
(options NFSD/options NFSCL instead of options NFSSERVER/options
NFSCLIENT):
cc -c -O2 -frename-registers -pipe -fno-strict-aliasing -march=native
On Sunday, April 24, 2011 3:12:13 pm Rick Macklem wrote:
On 04/24/11 02:00, Rick Macklem wrote:
There will soon be a commit to head that will change the
default NFS server to the new one that was called the
experimental NFS server (but no longer experimental). After
this commit, you
TB --- 2011-04-26 12:43:35 - tinderbox 2.6 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca
TB --- 2011-04-26 12:43:35 - starting HEAD tinderbox run for sparc64/sparc64
TB --- 2011-04-26 12:43:35 - cleaning the object tree
TB --- 2011-04-26 12:43:45 - cvsupping the source tree
TB --- 2011-04-26 12:43:45 -
TB --- 2011-04-26 12:43:40 - tinderbox 2.6 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca
TB --- 2011-04-26 12:43:40 - starting HEAD tinderbox run for sparc64/sun4v
TB --- 2011-04-26 12:43:40 - cleaning the object tree
TB --- 2011-04-26 12:43:47 - cvsupping the source tree
TB --- 2011-04-26 12:43:47 -
Quoting Julian Elischer jul...@freebsd.org (from Fri, 22 Apr 2011
18:28:06 -0700):
[linux ioctl compatibility]
So my first question is is this hack commonly known?
and secondly should we clean it up and put it in an ioctl(9) man page?
We should probably have such a page. Do we have a
Since today's source (FreeBSD 9.0-CURRENT/amd64 (source is:
Revision:
221060) update I get the follwoing error while building the kernel
(options NFSD/options NFSCL instead of options NFSSERVER/options
NFSCLIENT):
cc -c -O2 -frename-registers -pipe -fno-strict-aliasing
TB --- 2011-04-26 14:50:00 - tinderbox 2.6 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca
TB --- 2011-04-26 14:50:00 - starting HEAD tinderbox run for arm/arm
TB --- 2011-04-26 14:50:00 - cleaning the object tree
TB --- 2011-04-26 14:50:08 - cvsupping the source tree
TB --- 2011-04-26 14:50:08 -
On 04/26/11 15:54, Rick Macklem wrote:
Since today's source (FreeBSD 9.0-CURRENT/amd64 (source is:
Revision:
221060) update I get the follwoing error while building the kernel
(options NFSD/options NFSCL instead of options NFSSERVER/options
NFSCLIENT):
cc -c -O2 -frename-registers -pipe
On Wed, Aug 18, 2010, Rui Paulo wrote:
Hi,
I've been chatting with the ICC ex-users and they seem to be ok with the
removal of the ICC bits from share/mk and other places.
The reason is that it doesn't work and no one has volunteered to fix it for
many years. This seems to indicate that
TB --- 2011-04-26 15:39:39 - tinderbox 2.6 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca
TB --- 2011-04-26 15:39:39 - starting HEAD tinderbox run for ia64/ia64
TB --- 2011-04-26 15:39:39 - cleaning the object tree
TB --- 2011-04-26 15:39:46 - cvsupping the source tree
TB --- 2011-04-26 15:39:46 -
On Friday 08 April 2011 01:43 am, Andriy Gapon wrote:
on 07/04/2011 23:00 Jung-uk Kim said the following:
Although it looks okay, please don't commit it just yet. I am
working in this area actively. Also, if the Intel's claim is
true, i.e., TSCs reset to zero when APs start, we cannot use
TB --- 2011-04-26 16:56:41 - tinderbox 2.6 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca
TB --- 2011-04-26 16:56:41 - starting HEAD tinderbox run for mips/mips
TB --- 2011-04-26 16:56:41 - cleaning the object tree
TB --- 2011-04-26 16:56:50 - cvsupping the source tree
TB --- 2011-04-26 16:56:50 -
Hi,
On Tue, Apr 26, 2011 at 5:51 AM, Matthias Apitz g...@unixarea.de wrote:
El día Tuesday, April 26, 2011 a las 10:22:21AM +0100, David Woodhouse
escribió:
crash, i.e. it is *not* the typical hardware related crash;
- the above mentioned version evolution-exchange-2.32.1_1 is a fake,
TB --- 2011-04-26 18:07:22 - tinderbox 2.6 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca
TB --- 2011-04-26 18:07:22 - starting HEAD tinderbox run for sparc64/sparc64
TB --- 2011-04-26 18:07:22 - cleaning the object tree
TB --- 2011-04-26 18:07:35 - cvsupping the source tree
TB --- 2011-04-26 18:07:35 -
TB --- 2011-04-26 18:07:25 - tinderbox 2.6 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca
TB --- 2011-04-26 18:07:25 - starting HEAD tinderbox run for sparc64/sun4v
TB --- 2011-04-26 18:07:25 - cleaning the object tree
TB --- 2011-04-26 18:07:38 - cvsupping the source tree
TB --- 2011-04-26 18:07:38 -
On Saturday 23 April 2011 04:11 pm, Benjamin Kaduk wrote:
On Thu, 31 Mar 2011, Benjamin Kaduk wrote:
On Thu, 31 Mar 2011, Jung-uk Kim wrote:
On Thursday 31 March 2011 02:27 pm, Alexander Best wrote:
i just noticed the WWW links in pkg-descr of boths
nspluginwrapper and
Hi,
2011/4/25 Alexander Motin m...@freebsd.org:
Kostik Belousov wrote:
On Mon, Apr 25, 2011 at 03:26:02PM +0300, Alexander Motin wrote:
Andrey V. Elsukov wrote:
On 25.04.2011 14:23, Alexander Motin wrote:
What will not work:
- old device names won't be seen inside GEOM, so users who
On Mon, Apr 25, 2011 at 2:58 PM, John Baldwin j...@freebsd.org wrote:
Yes, I would perhaps tweak the comment to reflect the full if statement
though. Maybe something like:
/*
* If SMP is started and the thread is pinned or otherwise limited to
* a specific set of CPUs, queue the thread
On Tuesday, April 26, 2011 3:46:06 pm Ryan Stone wrote:
On Mon, Apr 25, 2011 at 2:58 PM, John Baldwin j...@freebsd.org wrote:
Yes, I would perhaps tweak the comment to reflect the full if statement
though. Maybe something like:
/*
* If SMP is started and the thread is pinned or
TB --- 2011-04-26 20:10:00 - tinderbox 2.6 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca
TB --- 2011-04-26 20:10:00 - starting HEAD tinderbox run for arm/arm
TB --- 2011-04-26 20:10:00 - cleaning the object tree
TB --- 2011-04-26 20:10:08 - cvsupping the source tree
TB --- 2011-04-26 20:10:08 -
El día Tuesday, April 26, 2011 a las 01:51:55PM -0400, Arnaud Lacombe escribió:
Then you can go to gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla and file a PR.
Thanks for your hints concerning the GCC problem; I will collect the
data and file a bug report;
If it is the gcc in the FreeBSD tree, please do not
Arnaud Lacombe wrote:
Hi,
2011/4/25 Alexander Motin m...@freebsd.org:
Kostik Belousov wrote:
On Mon, Apr 25, 2011 at 03:26:02PM +0300, Alexander Motin wrote:
Andrey V. Elsukov wrote:
On 25.04.2011 14:23, Alexander Motin wrote:
What will not work:
- old device names won't be seen inside
TB --- 2011-04-26 21:00:12 - tinderbox 2.6 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca
TB --- 2011-04-26 21:00:12 - starting HEAD tinderbox run for ia64/ia64
TB --- 2011-04-26 21:00:12 - cleaning the object tree
TB --- 2011-04-26 21:00:17 - cvsupping the source tree
TB --- 2011-04-26 21:00:17 -
Hi,
On Tue, Apr 26, 2011 at 5:19 PM, Matthias Apitz g...@unixarea.de wrote:
El día Tuesday, April 26, 2011 a las 01:51:55PM -0400, Arnaud Lacombe
escribió:
Then you can go to gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla and file a PR.
Thanks for your hints concerning the GCC problem; I will collect the
data
Actually, I think we should switch GENERIC in HEAD to the new client
and
kernel very soon. The goal is to get current users testing the new
client and
server so they can uncover any bugs. If problems crop up during the
testing
that can't be resolved, we can always revert to the older
39 matches
Mail list logo
