Chris Forgeron wrote:
[stuff snipped]
I hope to do a speed test comparison between new and old NFS servers
this weekend - At this stage, my feeling is that the new NFS server is
at least as fast. I suspect tests will show it to be faster (at least
the code looks faster. :-) ).
Well, I
On Sunday, June 05, 2011 8:23:53 pm John wrote:
Hi Folks,
I just attempted to update an HP385G0 system from current as of
4-15-2011 to 6-2-2011. The new system will not boot, and shows the
following message when it hangs:
pcib1:ACPI PCI-PCI bridge at device 3.0 on pci0
pcib1: failed
On Saturday, May 28, 2011 9:45:48 pm deeptec...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, May 26, 2011 at 3:40 PM, John Baldwin j...@freebsd.org wrote:
Ohh, you have two devices behind this bridge that have prefetch ranges.
As a hack, can you try this:
Index: pci_pci.c
TB --- 2011-06-06 14:58:07 - tinderbox 2.7 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca
TB --- 2011-06-06 14:58:07 - starting HEAD tinderbox run for powerpc64/powerpc
TB --- 2011-06-06 14:58:07 - cleaning the object tree
TB --- 2011-06-06 14:58:29 - cvsupping the source tree
TB --- 2011-06-06 14:58:29 -
TB --- 2011-06-06 15:04:05 - tinderbox 2.7 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca
TB --- 2011-06-06 15:04:05 - starting HEAD tinderbox run for sparc64/sparc64
TB --- 2011-06-06 15:04:05 - cleaning the object tree
TB --- 2011-06-06 15:04:16 - cvsupping the source tree
TB --- 2011-06-06 15:04:16 -
TB --- 2011-06-06 14:41:01 - tinderbox 2.7 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca
TB --- 2011-06-06 14:41:01 - starting HEAD tinderbox run for powerpc/powerpc
TB --- 2011-06-06 14:41:01 - cleaning the object tree
TB --- 2011-06-06 14:41:13 - cvsupping the source tree
TB --- 2011-06-06 14:41:13 -
TB --- 2011-06-06 16:30:00 - tinderbox 2.7 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca
TB --- 2011-06-06 16:30:00 - starting HEAD tinderbox run for arm/arm
TB --- 2011-06-06 16:30:00 - cleaning the object tree
TB --- 2011-06-06 16:30:14 - cvsupping the source tree
TB --- 2011-06-06 16:30:14 -
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Hi,
I think sometimes it's desirable to mark a few file systems as 'failok',
which means it's Ok to have these mounts failed on boot and something
else (a script, cron job, etc) will handle the case.
Here is a proposed patch to implement that,
TB --- 2011-06-06 16:30:00 - tinderbox 2.7 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca
TB --- 2011-06-06 16:30:00 - starting HEAD tinderbox run for i386/pc98
TB --- 2011-06-06 16:30:00 - cleaning the object tree
TB --- 2011-06-06 16:30:19 - cvsupping the source tree
TB --- 2011-06-06 16:30:19 -
TB --- 2011-06-06 16:30:00 - tinderbox 2.7 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca
TB --- 2011-06-06 16:30:00 - starting HEAD tinderbox run for amd64/amd64
TB --- 2011-06-06 16:30:00 - cleaning the object tree
TB --- 2011-06-06 16:30:23 - cvsupping the source tree
TB --- 2011-06-06 16:30:23 -
TB --- 2011-06-06 16:30:00 - tinderbox 2.7 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca
TB --- 2011-06-06 16:30:00 - starting HEAD tinderbox run for i386/i386
TB --- 2011-06-06 16:30:00 - cleaning the object tree
TB --- 2011-06-06 16:30:24 - cvsupping the source tree
TB --- 2011-06-06 16:30:24 -
TB --- 2011-06-06 17:21:39 - tinderbox 2.7 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca
TB --- 2011-06-06 17:21:39 - starting HEAD tinderbox run for ia64/ia64
TB --- 2011-06-06 17:21:39 - cleaning the object tree
TB --- 2011-06-06 17:21:50 - cvsupping the source tree
TB --- 2011-06-06 17:21:50 -
In message 4ded15b1.8020...@delphij.net, Xin LI writes:
I think sometimes it's desirable to mark a few file systems as 'failok',
which means it's Ok to have these mounts failed on boot and something
else (a script, cron job, etc) will handle the case.
Good idea. (This was one of the ideas that
On Tue, May 31, 2011 at 5:03 PM, Jung-uk Kim j...@freebsd.org wrote:
[...]
I found something strange about this BIOS (well, if we can call it
that). Please try this:
Index: sys/dev/atkbdc/atkbd.c
===
--- sys/dev/atkbdc/atkbd.c
TB --- 2011-06-06 18:24:00 - tinderbox 2.7 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca
TB --- 2011-06-06 18:24:00 - starting HEAD tinderbox run for mips/mips
TB --- 2011-06-06 18:24:00 - cleaning the object tree
TB --- 2011-06-06 18:24:06 - cvsupping the source tree
TB --- 2011-06-06 18:24:06 -
TB --- 2011-06-06 18:30:11 - tinderbox 2.7 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca
TB --- 2011-06-06 18:30:11 - starting HEAD tinderbox run for powerpc64/powerpc
TB --- 2011-06-06 18:30:11 - cleaning the object tree
TB --- 2011-06-06 18:30:16 - cvsupping the source tree
TB --- 2011-06-06 18:30:16 -
TB --- 2011-06-06 18:44:15 - tinderbox 2.7 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca
TB --- 2011-06-06 18:44:15 - starting HEAD tinderbox run for sparc64/sparc64
TB --- 2011-06-06 18:44:15 - cleaning the object tree
TB --- 2011-06-06 18:44:22 - cvsupping the source tree
TB --- 2011-06-06 18:44:22 -
TB --- 2011-06-06 18:24:29 - tinderbox 2.7 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca
TB --- 2011-06-06 18:24:29 - starting HEAD tinderbox run for powerpc/powerpc
TB --- 2011-06-06 18:24:29 - cleaning the object tree
TB --- 2011-06-06 18:24:36 - cvsupping the source tree
TB --- 2011-06-06 18:24:36 -
TB --- 2011-06-06 20:10:01 - tinderbox 2.7 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca
TB --- 2011-06-06 20:10:01 - starting HEAD tinderbox run for arm/arm
TB --- 2011-06-06 20:10:01 - cleaning the object tree
TB --- 2011-06-06 20:10:10 - cvsupping the source tree
TB --- 2011-06-06 20:10:10 -
2011/6/4 Fabian Keil freebsd-lis...@fabiankeil.de:
Attilio Rao atti...@freebsd.org wrote:
Current maximum number of CPUs supported by the FreeBSD kernel is 32.
That number cames from indirectly by the fact that we have a cpumask_t
type, representing a mask of CPUs, which is an unsigned int
TB --- 2011-06-06 21:02:12 - tinderbox 2.7 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca
TB --- 2011-06-06 21:02:12 - starting HEAD tinderbox run for ia64/ia64
TB --- 2011-06-06 21:02:12 - cleaning the object tree
TB --- 2011-06-06 21:02:17 - cvsupping the source tree
TB --- 2011-06-06 21:02:17 -
TB --- 2011-06-06 22:24:31 - tinderbox 2.7 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca
TB --- 2011-06-06 22:24:31 - starting HEAD tinderbox run for mips/mips
TB --- 2011-06-06 22:24:31 - cleaning the object tree
TB --- 2011-06-06 22:24:36 - cvsupping the source tree
TB --- 2011-06-06 22:24:36 -
TB --- 2011-06-06 23:27:55 - tinderbox 2.7 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca
TB --- 2011-06-06 23:27:55 - starting HEAD tinderbox run for sparc64/sparc64
TB --- 2011-06-06 23:27:55 - cleaning the object tree
TB --- 2011-06-06 23:28:01 - cvsupping the source tree
TB --- 2011-06-06 23:28:01 -
- John Baldwin's Original Message -
On Sunday, June 05, 2011 8:23:53 pm John wrote:
Hi Folks,
I just attempted to update an HP385G0 system from current as of
4-15-2011 to 6-2-2011. The new system will not boot, and shows the
following message when it hangs:
pcib1:ACPI
TB --- 2011-06-07 01:30:00 - tinderbox 2.7 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca
TB --- 2011-06-07 01:30:00 - starting HEAD tinderbox run for arm/arm
TB --- 2011-06-07 01:30:00 - cleaning the object tree
TB --- 2011-06-07 01:30:08 - cvsupping the source tree
TB --- 2011-06-07 01:30:08 -
On Mon, Jun 6, 2011 at 4:52 PM, John Baldwin j...@freebsd.org wrote:
Can you try out this change. It is a possible real solution (or at least a
stopgap until we start using multipass to untangle the resource mess a bit
further):
[snip]
that doesn't work. i get an allocation failure.
TB --- 2011-06-07 02:21:07 - tinderbox 2.7 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca
TB --- 2011-06-07 02:21:07 - starting HEAD tinderbox run for ia64/ia64
TB --- 2011-06-07 02:21:07 - cleaning the object tree
TB --- 2011-06-07 02:21:14 - cvsupping the source tree
TB --- 2011-06-07 02:21:14 -
TB --- 2011-06-07 03:43:13 - tinderbox 2.7 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca
TB --- 2011-06-07 03:43:13 - starting HEAD tinderbox run for mips/mips
TB --- 2011-06-07 03:43:13 - cleaning the object tree
TB --- 2011-06-07 03:43:21 - cvsupping the source tree
TB --- 2011-06-07 03:43:21 -
TB --- 2011-06-07 04:41:15 - tinderbox 2.7 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca
TB --- 2011-06-07 04:41:15 - starting HEAD tinderbox run for sparc64/sparc64
TB --- 2011-06-07 04:41:15 - cleaning the object tree
TB --- 2011-06-07 04:41:22 - cvsupping the source tree
TB --- 2011-06-07 04:41:22 -
hi,
in order to import netmap support into the tree (see
http://info.iet.unipi.it/~luigi/netmap ), i need
to use one of the if_cap{abilities|enable} bits to report
that the interface supports this mode and record whether
the mode is enabled or not.
Bit 0x10 is currently the first unused bit
30 matches
Mail list logo
