on 10/09/2011 14:03 Peter Jeremy said the following:
On 2011-Sep-10 12:46:50 +0300, Andriy Gapon a...@freebsd.org wrote:
on 10/09/2011 11:07 Andriy Gapon said the following:
Actually, removing either -mrtd _or_ -fno-unit-at-a-time produces the
correct code. Puzzled.
The problem is
On Sat, 10 Sep 2011 21:10:44 +0400
Boris Samorodov b...@ipt.ru wrote:
On Sat, 10 Sep 2011 16:08:21 +0200 Gary Jennejohn wrote:
On Tue, 06 Sep 2011 16:29:51 +0400 Boris Samorodov wrote:
the port does not work as expected (at least as per The Handbook,
26.2.5 Serial Port
on 11/09/2011 11:31 Andriy Gapon said the following:
And I am actually wondering about -fno-unit-at-a-time option.
In my opinion this is an anti-optimization option and it can actually increase
a size of a final binary. In fact, it looks like the option was introduced to
boot2 in r132870 in
Hi all,
I've discovered a small bug in dump. When dump reads
the /etc/dumpdates, at the moment the device name in the first column is
restricted to 32 characters.
With todays GEOM implementation, it's easy to make longer device names.
My device is named: /dev/mirror/encrypted.elig.journal. And
On Tue, Sep 06, 2011 at 04:29:51PM +0400, Boris Samorodov wrote:
the port does not work as expected (at least as per The Handbook,
26.2.5 Serial Port Configuration). Nether init nor lock
devices can be used:
-
# uname -a
FreeBSD host1.ipt.ru 9.0-BETA2 FreeBSD 9.0-BETA2 #14 r225395: Mon
Adrian Chadd wrote on 11.09.2011 04:56:
Please submit a PR so I/others don't forget.
Then just follow through with an email to me w/ the PR number.
Thanks,
Adrian
Done. http://bugs.freebsd.org/160652
--
Regards,
Ruslan
Tinderboxing kills... the drives.
On 2011-Sep-11 11:31:54 +0300, Andriy Gapon a...@freebsd.org wrote:
And I am actually wondering about -fno-unit-at-a-time option.
In my opinion this is an anti-optimization option and it can actually increase
a size of a final binary. In fact, it looks like the option was introduced to
boot2 in
On 09/11/11 13:31, Peter Jeremy wrote:
On 2011-Sep-11 11:31:54 +0300, Andriy Gapona...@freebsd.org wrote:
And I am actually wondering about -fno-unit-at-a-time option.
In my opinion this is an anti-optimization option and it can actually increase
a size of a final binary. In fact, it looks
Hi.
On 04.09.2011 10:32, Andriy Gapon wrote:
ahcich0: Timeout on slot 0 port 0
ahcich0: is 0005 cs ss rs 0001 tfd 50 serr
cmd 1000c017
ahcich0: AHCI reset...
ahcich0: SATA connect time=0us status=0113
ahcich0: AHCI reset: device found
ahcich0: AHCI
On Sun, Sep 11, 2011 at 6:31 AM, Peter Jeremy peterjer...@acm.org wrote:
In any case, size isn't an issue for any of gptboot, gptzfsboot or
zfsboot (unlike boot2). For that matter, why do we need both
gptboot and gptzfsboot? It would be more convenient to have a
single GPT bootstrap that
the result is:
db show intrcnt
cpu0: timer4510
irq256: hdac0 1
cpu3: timer 29
cpu1: timer 3036
cpu2: timer 31
db
I did break at the mountfrom prompt
If I break before I only have the cpu0 and irq256 entries.
Hmmm, is there any way you can build a 9
I'm trying to use the iconv that's in FreeBSD-CURRENT and it's not reporting
errors the way I expect. To demonstrate, here's a test program that tries to
convert UTF-8 to KOI8-R. This should report an error, since the UTF-8 string
here ĐÒÉ×ÅÔ contains characters not available in KOI8-R.
On
Actually, I think this kind of question is for the freebsd-current list, so I
respond on that list.
Problem with the old sysinstall is that sysinstall expects installation sets to
be broken into 1392 KB chunks as opposed to a full .tgz, .tbz or .txz, or so I
believe: I could be wrong.
I
On Sun, 11 Sep 2011 10:33:18 +0200 Gary Jennejohn wrote:
On Sat, 10 Sep 2011 21:10:44 +0400
Boris Samorodov b...@ipt.ru wrote:
On Sat, 10 Sep 2011 16:08:21 +0200 Gary Jennejohn wrote:
On Tue, 06 Sep 2011 16:29:51 +0400 Boris Samorodov wrote:
the port does not work as expected (at
On Sep 11, 2011 6:54 PM, Boris Samorodov b...@ipt.ru wrote:
On Sun, 11 Sep 2011 10:33:18 +0200 Gary Jennejohn wrote:
On Sat, 10 Sep 2011 21:10:44 +0400
Boris Samorodov b...@ipt.ru wrote:
On Sat, 10 Sep 2011 16:08:21 +0200 Gary Jennejohn wrote:
On Tue, 06 Sep 2011 16:29:51 +0400 Boris
On Sun, 11 Sep 2011 13:02:58 +0200 Jilles Tjoelker wrote:
On Tue, Sep 06, 2011 at 04:29:51PM +0400, Boris Samorodov wrote:
the port does not work as expected (at least as per The Handbook,
26.2.5 Serial Port Configuration). Nether init nor lock
devices can be used:
-
# uname -a
On Sun, 11 Sep 2011 19:31:33 -1000 David Cornejo wrote:
It's been a long time,
It worked at 8.2-PRERELEASE for me (and seemed to be a bug
at 9.0-BETA2):
-
% uname -a
FreeBSD hht.ipt.ru 8.2-PRERELEASE FreeBSD 8.2-PRERELEASE #0 r216685: Fri Dec 24
10:16:47 MSK 2010
17 matches
Mail list logo
