Hi there
After my upgrade from 285.03 to 285.05.09 I experience daily to bidaily
freezes on 10-current, with nvidia 8600gts.
I'm guessing they come from the nvidia-driver. I'm back to 285.03 (which
ran without fault) now to test if they persist.
mfg tobias
On Wed, 12 Oct 2011 04:20:07 +0
Fabian Keil wrote:
> I pretty reproducible get the following (handtranscribed) panic
> when sending an zfs snapshot to geli provider based on an USB
> stick that disappears (due to a bug, or because it's unplugged):
>
> Fatal trap 12: page fault while in kernel mode
> cpuid = 0: apic id = 00
>
On Wed, 19 Oct 2011 19:14:07 +0800
Adrian Chadd wrote:
> .. what's wrong with your first suggestion? I liked it. :)
>
>
> Adrian
Because we can't do duplex operations in that way. But if we use old
struct, we will be able send and receive in the same time. I don't know
if such device exists. B
On Wed, Oct 19, 2011 at 12:12 PM, Warren Block wrote:
> On Wed, 19 Oct 2011, Oliver Pinter wrote:
>
>> On 10/19/11, Olivier Smedts wrote:
>>>
>>> 2011/10/19 Marcel Moolenaar :
On Oct 18, 2011, at 9:04 AM, Andriy Gapon wrote:
> Would you be able to commit a variant of this patch
On Wed, 19 Oct 2011, Oliver Pinter wrote:
On 10/19/11, Olivier Smedts wrote:
2011/10/19 Marcel Moolenaar :
On Oct 18, 2011, at 9:04 AM, Andriy Gapon wrote:
Would you be able to commit a variant of this patch sans the 'x' part?
Yes, soonish. If people like the 'x' change I can do that in a
On 10/19/11, Olivier Smedts wrote:
> Hello,
>
> 2011/10/19 Marcel Moolenaar :
>>
>> On Oct 18, 2011, at 9:04 AM, Andriy Gapon wrote:
>>
>>> Would you be able to commit a variant of this patch sans the 'x' part?
>>>
>>
>> Yes, soonish. If people like the 'x' change I can do that in a followup
>> co
On Tue Oct 18 11, Andriy Gapon wrote:
> on 17/10/2011 23:01 Alexander Best said the following:
> > hi there,
> >
> > any thoughts regarding this change? with the ata subsystem dying, linking to
> > /dev/acd isn't really necessary any more. also a lot of ports nowadays
> > depend
> > on /dev/dvd.
On Oct 19, 2011, at 11:47 AM, Anton Shterenlikht wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 19, 2011 at 10:38:30AM -0700, Garrett Cooper wrote:
>> On Wed, Oct 19, 2011 at 10:19 AM, Anton Shterenlikht
>> wrote:
>>> On Wed, Oct 19, 2011 at 12:00:12PM -0400, Michael Butler wrote:
On 10/19/11 11:39, Dag-Erling Sm??r
On Wed, Oct 19, 2011 at 10:38:30AM -0700, Garrett Cooper wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 19, 2011 at 10:19 AM, Anton Shterenlikht
> wrote:
> > On Wed, Oct 19, 2011 at 12:00:12PM -0400, Michael Butler wrote:
> >> On 10/19/11 11:39, Dag-Erling Sm??rgrav wrote:
> >> >Michael Butler ?writes:
> >> >>When running
Hello,
2011/10/19 Marcel Moolenaar :
>
> On Oct 18, 2011, at 9:04 AM, Andriy Gapon wrote:
>
>> Would you be able to commit a variant of this patch sans the 'x' part?
>>
>
> Yes, soonish. If people like the 'x' change I can do that in a followup
> commit as well. I just need to know if people like
On Oct 18, 2011, at 9:04 AM, Andriy Gapon wrote:
> on 14/10/2011 18:54 Arnaud Lacombe said the following:
>> Andry Gapon wrote:
>>> Simple: revert to the previous behavior. If a user enters incorrect device
>>> name
>>> (i.e. root mounting fails), then return back to the prompt instead of
>>>
On Wed, Oct 19, 2011 at 10:19 AM, Anton Shterenlikht
wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 19, 2011 at 12:00:12PM -0400, Michael Butler wrote:
>> On 10/19/11 11:39, Dag-Erling Sm??rgrav wrote:
>> >Michael Butler writes:
>> >>When running 'configure' for, say, the latest clamav update, '/bin/ls'
>> >>dumps core wi
On Wed, Oct 19, 2011 at 12:00:12PM -0400, Michael Butler wrote:
> On 10/19/11 11:39, Dag-Erling Sm??rgrav wrote:
> >Michael Butler writes:
> >>When running 'configure' for, say, the latest clamav update, '/bin/ls'
> >>dumps core with a floating point exception.
> >
> >Thanks for the report. Try r
On 19. Oct 2011, at 16:00 , Rick Macklem wrote:
> Bjoern A. Zeeb wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> as a result of a make buildkernel && make installkernel && reboot all
>> on NFS I got this with a HEAD SVN source at r226465. I cannot dump
>> unfortunately and it seems I just killed the obj tree for this kernel
Bjoern A. Zeeb wrote:
> Hi,
>
> as a result of a make buildkernel && make installkernel && reboot all
> on NFS I got this with a HEAD SVN source at r226465. I cannot dump
> unfortunately and it seems I just killed the obj tree for this kernel
> though it should be very close.
>
> Oct 18 10:03:22
On 10/19/11 11:39, Dag-Erling Smørgrav wrote:
Michael Butler writes:
When running 'configure' for, say, the latest clamav update, '/bin/ls'
dumps core with a floating point exception.
Thanks for the report. Try r226546.
Fixed - Thanks! :-)
imb
___
Michael Butler writes:
> When running 'configure' for, say, the latest clamav update, '/bin/ls'
> dumps core with a floating point exception.
Thanks for the report. Try r226546.
DES
--
Dag-Erling Smørgrav - d...@des.no
___
freebsd-current@freebsd.org
.
During install, in the 'Add Users' part, why is it able to add the new
user 'peter' to a new group 'peter' [the default option], but when I try
to put user 'peter' into a more generic new group 'admin' it says group
does not exist - I figure group 'peter' also does not exist at this time.
"Invit
I have run into the same issue recently. I have been testing the
following patch(on 8.2-RELEASE) and it seems to have worked for me:
--- mkmakefile.c 11:09:30.0 -0400
+++ mkmakefile.c2011-10-06 11:13:31.0 -0400
@@ -742,15 +742,16 @@
break;
2011/10/19 Adrian Chadd
> On 19 October 2011 19:38, Pavel Timofeev wrote:
>
> > http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=160943 (there is hope)
> > or http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=161123 (little hope. it's
> not
> > me, but there I was noisy.)
>
> Just send the committer a polite
2011/10/19 Johan Hendriks
> Pavel Timofeev schreef:
>
> I think we hurry. Imo, BETA/RC period for !NEW! STABLE branch should be> >
> longer. Six months, for example.> > New STABLE branch is very important!
>
> >> So is opening head up to allow developers to work on and commit new>
> code. A
When running 'configure' for, say, the latest clamav update, '/bin/ls'
dumps core with a floating point exception.
Reversing out SVN r226509 restores normal operation,
imb
___
freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/m
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello!
I wanted to let you know that FreeBSD is booting again. I don't know
exatly what was the solution but here's what I did:
1. clean up the pool, now 90% of free space
2. buildworld with r226519 and Andriy's patch:
http://people.fre
TB --- 2011-10-19 11:40:00 - tinderbox 2.8 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca
TB --- 2011-10-19 11:40:00 - starting HEAD tinderbox run for amd64/amd64
TB --- 2011-10-19 11:40:00 - cleaning the object tree
TB --- 2011-10-19 11:40:08 - cvsupping the source tree
TB --- 2011-10-19 11:40:08 - /usr/bin
TB --- 2011-10-19 11:40:00 - tinderbox 2.8 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca
TB --- 2011-10-19 11:40:00 - starting HEAD tinderbox run for i386/pc98
TB --- 2011-10-19 11:40:00 - cleaning the object tree
TB --- 2011-10-19 11:40:08 - cvsupping the source tree
TB --- 2011-10-19 11:40:08 - /usr/bin/c
TB --- 2011-10-19 11:40:00 - tinderbox 2.8 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca
TB --- 2011-10-19 11:40:00 - starting HEAD tinderbox run for i386/i386
TB --- 2011-10-19 11:40:00 - cleaning the object tree
TB --- 2011-10-19 11:40:08 - cvsupping the source tree
TB --- 2011-10-19 11:40:08 - /usr/bin/c
2011/10/19 Adrian Chadd
> On 19 October 2011 15:42, Pavel Timofeev wrote:
>
> > =) Thats why we don't have much people in FreeBSD. FreeBSD for users? or
> > developers?
>
> > The big problem is that these conversations are not wanted everyone.
> > Nobody cares. For example, Vadim Goncharov wrote
2011/10/19 Adrian Chadd
> On 19 October 2011 16:04, Pavel Timofeev wrote:
>
> > kern/160678? A good example.
> > I give 5$ that this fix won't be in 9.0 RELEASE =)
> > I know a few other important PRs that won't be in 9.0 RELEASE.
> > Thats why I wrote initial email.
>
> Kirk fixed it in -HEAD.
Pavel Timofeev schreef:
I think we hurry. Imo, BETA/RC period for !NEW! STABLE branch should be
> > longer. Six months, for example.
> > New STABLE branch is very important!
>
> So is opening head up to allow developers to work on and commit new
> code. As with many things in engineering,
On 19 October 2011 19:38, Pavel Timofeev wrote:
> http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=160943 (there is hope)
> or http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=161123 (little hope. it's not
> me, but there I was noisy.)
Just send the committer a polite, nicely worded email and see if
they'll
On 19 October 2011 16:04, Pavel Timofeev wrote:
> kern/160678? A good example.
> I give 5$ that this fix won't be in 9.0 RELEASE =)
> I know a few other important PRs that won't be in 9.0 RELEASE.
> Thats why I wrote initial email.
Kirk fixed it in -HEAD. I hope he'll get it tested and backporte
On 19 October 2011 15:42, Pavel Timofeev wrote:
> =) Thats why we don't have much people in FreeBSD. FreeBSD for users? or
> developers?
> The big problem is that these conversations are not wanted everyone.
> Nobody cares. For example, Vadim Goncharov wrote big mail with description
> of variou
2011/10/15 Thomas Mueller
> > MHO different OS releases (Unix or not) are usually at the state of
> > FreeBSD current regarding stability. FreeBSD late BETA and early RC
> > are usually very stable. Therefore the approximate one month period
> > between the first beta and the release is adequate
2011/10/15 Martin Sugioarto
> Am Fri, 14 Oct 2011 11:55:28 +0400
> schrieb Pavel Timofeev :
>
> > That's what most people think.
>
> Hi!
>
> I'm not thinking this. This is made up by users who only adapt slowly
> to changes and features. Look at the whole crowd which got furious about
> the new M
2011/10/15 George Kontostanos
> On Fri, Oct 14, 2011 at 10:55 AM, Pavel Timofeev wrote:
> > That's what most people think.
>
> > I think we hurry. Imo, BETA/RC period for !NEW! STABLE branch should be
> > longer. Six months, for example.
> > New STABLE branch is very important!
>
> IMHO differen
2011/10/14 David Wolfskill
> On Fri, Oct 14, 2011 at 11:55:28AM +0400, Pavel Timofeev wrote:
> > That's what most people think.
>
> Could be. But to the extent that it's true, I have no reason to believe
> that it's a perspective that is held uniquely (or even principally) about
> FreeBSD.
>
> >
.. what's wrong with your first suggestion? I liked it. :)
Adrian
___
freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
2011/10/17 Warren Block
> On Mon, 17 Oct 2011, Alexander Yerenkow wrote:
>
> Hello all.
>> I'm currently made set of scripts, which builds FreeBSD from svn sources,
>> and packing it in VirtualBox (*.vdi) compatible images.
>> It's working now, and producing something like
>>
>> FreeBSD-9-i386-r
TB --- 2011-10-19 08:56:44 - tinderbox 2.8 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca
TB --- 2011-10-19 08:56:44 - starting HEAD tinderbox run for powerpc/powerpc
TB --- 2011-10-19 08:56:44 - cleaning the object tree
TB --- 2011-10-19 08:56:49 - cvsupping the source tree
TB --- 2011-10-19 08:56:49 - /usr
TB --- 2011-10-19 08:10:00 - tinderbox 2.8 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca
TB --- 2011-10-19 08:10:00 - starting HEAD tinderbox run for amd64/amd64
TB --- 2011-10-19 08:10:00 - cleaning the object tree
TB --- 2011-10-19 08:10:08 - cvsupping the source tree
TB --- 2011-10-19 08:10:08 - /usr/bin
TB --- 2011-10-19 08:10:00 - tinderbox 2.8 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca
TB --- 2011-10-19 08:10:00 - starting HEAD tinderbox run for i386/pc98
TB --- 2011-10-19 08:10:00 - cleaning the object tree
TB --- 2011-10-19 08:10:08 - cvsupping the source tree
TB --- 2011-10-19 08:10:08 - /usr/bin/c
TB --- 2011-10-19 08:10:00 - tinderbox 2.8 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca
TB --- 2011-10-19 08:10:00 - starting HEAD tinderbox run for i386/i386
TB --- 2011-10-19 08:10:00 - cleaning the object tree
TB --- 2011-10-19 08:10:08 - cvsupping the source tree
TB --- 2011-10-19 08:10:08 - /usr/bin/c
On 18. Oct 2011, at 22:30 , Mattia Rossi wrote:
> On 19/10/2011 08:16, Bjoern A. Zeeb wrote:
>>
>> On 18. Oct 2011, at 20:00 , Johann Hugo wrote:
>>
>>> Hi
>>>
>>> The only way that I can get bfe0 to enable ACCEPT_RTADV is to manually do it
>>> with ifconfig bfe0 inet6 accept_rtadv. Even if I a
Mattia Rossi wrote
in <4e9dfe11.2070...@swin.edu.au>:
mr> So the _ipv6 bit doesn't take care of passing "inet6" to ifconfig
mr> automatically?
No. You always need to add the inet6 keyword wherever needed.
mr> Does passing two options work, or do I have to pass them separately?
mr> E.g.:
mr>
Xin LI wrote
in <4e9dfd46.1040...@delphij.net>:
de> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
de> Hash: SHA256
de>
de> On 10/18/11 15:07, Hiroki Sato wrote:
de> > Hideki Yamamoto wrote in
de> > :
de> >
de> > hy> Hi, hy> hy> Does someone know where is the draft of FreeBSD
de> > 9.0 release note? hy>
Johann Hugo wrote
in <201110190845.17950.jh...@meraka.csir.co.za>:
jh> On Tuesday, October 18, 2011 11:16:57 pm Bjoern A. Zeeb wrote:
jh> > On 18. Oct 2011, at 20:00 , Johann Hugo wrote:
jh> > > Hi
jh> > >
jh> > > The only way that I can get bfe0 to enable ACCEPT_RTADV is to manually
do
jh> >
46 matches
Mail list logo
