On Fri, Dec 09, 2011 at 01:33:04AM +0100, Andre Oppermann wrote:
> On 08.12.2011 16:34, Luigi Rizzo wrote:
> >On Fri, Dec 09, 2011 at 12:11:50AM +1100, Lawrence Stewart wrote:
...
> >>Jeff tested the WIP patch and it *doesn't* fix the issue. I don't have
> >>LRO capable hardware setup locally to fi
The third and what should be final Release Candidate build for the
9.0-RELEASE release cycle is now available. Since this is the
beginning of a brand new branch (stable/9) I cross-post the
announcements to both -current and -stable. But just so you know
most of the developers active in head and
Hi all,
Just wanted to report back that I found time to do more diagnostics.
ZFS/FreeBSD/etc are not to blame. ZFS / FreeBSD never reported any I/O
errors and scrubs always came up clean because one of the disks was
failing and had issues reading the disk but would eventually return
accurate
Dear -hackers,
can someone please enlighten me as to why maxio is not set by mps(4),
and, what would be a reasonable number to set it to if i felt inclined
to do so? default DFLTPHYS of 64K seems a bit low to me.
thanks,
max
___
freebsd-current@freebsd.
Hello -current!
Recently on -arch@, we discussed adding the C99 keywords bool, true,
and false to the kernel. I now have patches to do this as well as fix
up some build issues.
The original thread was here:
http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-arch/2011-November/011937.html
I split the p
On 08.12.2011 16:34, Luigi Rizzo wrote:
On Fri, Dec 09, 2011 at 12:11:50AM +1100, Lawrence Stewart wrote:
On 12/08/11 05:08, Luigi Rizzo wrote:
...
I ran a bunch of tests on the ixgbe (82599) using RELENG_8 (which
seems slightly faster than HEAD) using MTU=1500 and various
combinations of card
On 08.12.2011 14:11, Lawrence Stewart wrote:
On 12/08/11 05:08, Luigi Rizzo wrote:
On Wed, Dec 07, 2011 at 11:59:43AM +0100, Andre Oppermann wrote:
On 06.12.2011 22:06, Luigi Rizzo wrote:
...
Even in my experiments there is a lot of instability in the results.
I don't know exactly where the p
On 08/12/2011 15:55, Sean Bruno wrote:
BSDInstaller and its predecessor Sysinstall don't have any code to
create or destroy zfs(4) or geom(4) volumes. So, the amount of exposure
to real users is approaching 0 in comparison to the number of people who
really do use FreeBSD.
I have my hands full
Sean Bruno schreef:
On Thu, 2011-12-08 at 02:08 -0800, Peter Maloney wrote:
And what problems did you run into?
More or less, trying to do gmirror(4) style mirroring on GPT partitions
doesn't work. See http://www.freebsd.org/doc/handbook/geom-mirror.html
for the BIG RED WARNING that says why.
On Thu, Dec 8, 2011 at 3:55 PM, Sean Bruno wrote:
> On Thu, 2011-12-08 at 02:08 -0800, Peter Maloney wrote:
>> And what problems did you run into?
>>
>
> More or less, trying to do gmirror(4) style mirroring on GPT partitions
> doesn't work. See http://www.freebsd.org/doc/handbook/geom-mirror.htm
On Thu, 2011-12-08 at 02:08 -0800, Peter Maloney wrote:
> And what problems did you run into?
>
More or less, trying to do gmirror(4) style mirroring on GPT partitions
doesn't work. See http://www.freebsd.org/doc/handbook/geom-mirror.html
for the BIG RED WARNING that says why.
> This guide work
On 12/4/11 5:11 PM, Andriy Gapon wrote:
on 02/12/2011 17:30 m...@freebsd.org said the following:
On Fri, Dec 2, 2011 at 2:05 AM, Andriy Gapon wrote:
on 02/12/2011 06:36 John Baldwin said the following:
Ah, ok (I had thought SCHEDULER_STOPPED was going to always be true when kdb was
active).
On Fri, Dec 09, 2011 at 12:11:50AM +1100, Lawrence Stewart wrote:
> On 12/08/11 05:08, Luigi Rizzo wrote:
...
> >I ran a bunch of tests on the ixgbe (82599) using RELENG_8 (which
> >seems slightly faster than HEAD) using MTU=1500 and various
> >combinations of card capabilities (hwcsum,tso,lro), di
On Mon, Dec 05, 2011 at 08:27:03PM +0100, Luigi Rizzo wrote:
> Hi,
> I am trying to establish the baseline performance for 10G throughput
> over TCP, and would like to collect some data points. As a testing
> program i am using nuttcp from ports (as good as anything, i
> guess -- it is reasonably
On 12/08/2011 01:25, Thomas Mueller wrote:
I can't get cdrtools (cdrecord or readcd) to work on FreeBSD 9.0-RC2, and now I
see RC3 is available.
I tried "options ATA_CAM" in kernel config, removing "device atapicam", but
still
readcd -scanbus or
cdrecord -scanbus
refuses to work, running as r
> Hi,
>
> If someone want to look at I've added support for VIA south bridge watchdog.
> It has been tested on VX900 but should works with VX800, VX855, CX700.
>
> http://people.freebsd.org/~fabient/patch-watchdog-via-rev1
>
Posted rev2 : http://people.freebsd.org/~fabient/patch-watchdo
On 12/08/11 05:08, Luigi Rizzo wrote:
On Wed, Dec 07, 2011 at 11:59:43AM +0100, Andre Oppermann wrote:
On 06.12.2011 22:06, Luigi Rizzo wrote:
...
Even in my experiments there is a lot of instability in the results.
I don't know exactly where the problem is, but the high number of
read syscall
from my last message:
I can't get cdrtools (cdrecord or readcd) to work on FreeBSD 9.0-RC2, and now I
see RC3 is available.
I tried "options ATA_CAM" in kernel config, removing "device atapicam", but
still
readcd -scanbus or
cdrecord -scanbus
refuses to work, running as root.
"camcontrol dev
On Thu, Dec 08, 2011 at 12:06:26PM +0200, Daniel Kalchev wrote:
>
>
> On 07.12.11 22:23, Luigi Rizzo wrote:
> >
> >Sorry, forgot to mention that the above is with TSO DISABLED
> >(which is not the default). TSO seems to have a very bad
> >interaction with HWCSUM and non-zero mitigation.
>
> I ha
On 12/08/2011 09:35 AM, Daniel Gerzo wrote:
> On Tue, 06 Dec 2011 13:51:05 -0800, Sean Bruno wrote:
>> Was trying to use gmirror(4) or zfs(4) today to get a machine in the
>> cluster setup with s/w raid and was completely flummoxed by the
>> intricacies of manual setup. Chances are, I just am not
On 07.12.11 22:23, Luigi Rizzo wrote:
Sorry, forgot to mention that the above is with TSO DISABLED
(which is not the default). TSO seems to have a very bad
interaction with HWCSUM and non-zero mitigation.
I have this on both sender and receiver
# ifconfig ix1
ix1: flags=8843 metric 0 mtu 15
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
on 08/12/2011 10:13 Pawel Jakub Dawidek said the following:
> On Wed, Dec 07, 2011 at 06:50:35PM +0200, Andriy Gapon wrote:
>> (kgdb) bt #0 doadump (textdump=1) at pcpu.h:224 #1 0x804f6d3b
>> in kern_reboot (howto=260) at /usr/src/sys/kern/ke
On Tue, 06 Dec 2011 13:51:05 -0800, Sean Bruno wrote:
Was trying to use gmirror(4) or zfs(4) today to get a machine in the
cluster setup with s/w raid and was completely flummoxed by the
intricacies of manual setup. Chances are, I just am not smart enough
to
wind my way though the various how
On Wed, Dec 07, 2011 at 06:50:35PM +0200, Andriy Gapon wrote:
> (kgdb) bt
> #0 doadump (textdump=1) at pcpu.h:224
> #1 0x804f6d3b in kern_reboot (howto=260) at
> /usr/src/sys/kern/kern_shutdown.c:447
> #2 0x804f63e9 in panic (fmt=0x104 ) at
> /usr/src/sys/kern/kern_shutdown.c:635
24 matches
Mail list logo