On 26 Jun 2012, at 15:42, m...@freebsd.org wrote:
While I understand the problems you allude to, the sysctl(8) binary
can protect itself from them. IMO the biggest problem with sysctls
not being files is that it makes no sense from the core UNIX
philosophy that everything is a file.
Andrey V. Elsukov bu7c...@yandex.ru writes:
On 29.06.2012 15:01, Jan Beich wrote:
So, i have created the branch and committed the changes:
http://svnweb.freebsd.org/base/user/ae/bootcode/
The patch is here:
http://people.freebsd.org/~ae/boot.diff
FWIW, I verified it compiles OK with
On Sun, Jul 01, 2012 at 03:52:05PM +0200, Attilio Rao wrote:
anything by SoC involved people about NTFS and certainly I don't see a
plan to get XFS locked.
Stupid question, but what amount of locking does XFS in FreeBSD still
need? I'm one of the maintainer of XFS on Linux, and while I know
TB --- 2012-07-02 05:20:00 - tinderbox 2.9 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca
TB --- 2012-07-02 05:20:00 - FreeBSD freebsd-current.sentex.ca 8.3-PRERELEASE
FreeBSD 8.3-PRERELEASE #0: Mon Mar 26 13:54:12 EDT 2012
d...@freebsd-current.sentex.ca:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64
TB ---
On Sun, Jul 01, 2012 at 12:13:30PM +0100, Vincent Hoffman wrote:
On 01/07/2012 01:53, Rick Macklem wrote:
I haven't looked at Andrey's patch, but conceptually it sounds like
the best approach. As I understand it, the problem with replacing
mountd with nfse (at least in the FreeBSD source
On Sun, Jul 01, 2012 at 11:03:49AM -0700, Marcel Moolenaar wrote:
On Jun 21, 2012, at 8:40 AM, Anton Shterenlikht wrote:
*snip*
Trying to mount root from ufs:/dev/da2p2 [rw]...
WARNING: / was not properly dismounted
Jun 21 17:35:34 init: fatal signal: Segmentation fault
Setting
On Sun, Jul 01, 2012 at 11:28:04AM -0700, Marcel Moolenaar wrote:
On Jun 29, 2012, at 3:40 AM, Anton Shterenlikht wrote:
# newfs /dev/da2p2
/dev/da2p2: 16384.0MB (33554432 sectors) block size 32768, fragment size
4096
using 27 cylinder groups of 626.09MB, 20035 blks, 80256
On 02/07/2012 13:05, Andrey Simonenko wrote:
On Sun, Jul 01, 2012 at 12:13:30PM +0100, Vincent Hoffman wrote:
On 01/07/2012 01:53, Rick Macklem wrote:
I haven't looked at Andrey's patch, but conceptually it sounds like
the best approach. As I understand it, the problem with replacing
mountd
2012/7/2, Christoph Hellwig h...@infradead.org:
On Sun, Jul 01, 2012 at 03:52:05PM +0200, Attilio Rao wrote:
anything by SoC involved people about NTFS and certainly I don't see a
plan to get XFS locked.
Stupid question, but what amount of locking does XFS in FreeBSD still
need? I'm one of
On 7/2/12 1:12 AM, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
On Sun, Jul 01, 2012 at 03:52:05PM +0200, Attilio Rao wrote:
anything by SoC involved people about NTFS and certainly I don't see a
plan to get XFS locked.
Stupid question, but what amount of locking does XFS in FreeBSD still
need? I'm one of the
2012/7/2, Russell Cattelan catte...@thebarn.com:
On 7/2/12 1:12 AM, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
On Sun, Jul 01, 2012 at 03:52:05PM +0200, Attilio Rao wrote:
anything by SoC involved people about NTFS and certainly I don't see a
plan to get XFS locked.
Stupid question, but what amount of locking
On Mon, Jul 02, 2012 at 02:12:20AM -0400, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
On Sun, Jul 01, 2012 at 03:52:05PM +0200, Attilio Rao wrote:
anything by SoC involved people about NTFS and certainly I don't see a
plan to get XFS locked.
Stupid question, but what amount of locking does XFS in FreeBSD
On Sunday, July 01, 2012 8:23:31 am Bjoern A. Zeeb wrote:
Hey,
hitting this printf in swp_pager_meta_build()
if (uma_zone_exhausted(swap_zone)) {
printf(swap zone exhausted, increase
kern.maxswzone\n);
On Saturday, June 30, 2012 7:54:58 pm Erich Dollansky wrote:
Hi,
On Sunday, July 01, 2012 06:51:41 AM AN wrote:
FreeBSD FBSD10 10.0-CURRENT FreeBSD 10.0-CURRENT #23 r237852: Sat Jun 30
18:45:27 EDT 2012 root@FBSD10:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/MYKERNEL amd64
After a recent upgrade, I am
On Jul 2, 2012, at 5:43 AM, Anton Shterenlikht wrote:
I think you're kernel is seriously screwed-up. Do you have any
non-standard (for ia64) kernel configuration options?
I didn't think so.
The latest was this:
*snip*
Looks fine indeed. I have pretty much the same, except for the
On 2. Jul 2012, at 14:36 , John Baldwin wrote:
On Sunday, July 01, 2012 8:23:31 am Bjoern A. Zeeb wrote:
Hey,
hitting this printf in swp_pager_meta_build()
if (uma_zone_exhausted(swap_zone)) {
printf(swap zone exhausted, increase
TB --- 2012-07-02 16:39:32 - tinderbox 2.9 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca
TB --- 2012-07-02 16:39:32 - FreeBSD freebsd-current.sentex.ca 8.3-PRERELEASE
FreeBSD 8.3-PRERELEASE #0: Mon Mar 26 13:54:12 EDT 2012
d...@freebsd-current.sentex.ca:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64
TB ---
TB --- 2012-07-02 16:42:58 - tinderbox 2.9 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca
TB --- 2012-07-02 16:42:58 - FreeBSD freebsd-current.sentex.ca 8.3-PRERELEASE
FreeBSD 8.3-PRERELEASE #0: Mon Mar 26 13:54:12 EDT 2012
d...@freebsd-current.sentex.ca:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64
TB ---
TB --- 2012-07-02 16:46:30 - tinderbox 2.9 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca
TB --- 2012-07-02 16:46:30 - FreeBSD freebsd-current.sentex.ca 8.3-PRERELEASE
FreeBSD 8.3-PRERELEASE #0: Mon Mar 26 13:54:12 EDT 2012
d...@freebsd-current.sentex.ca:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64
TB ---
TB --- 2012-07-02 16:52:54 - tinderbox 2.9 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca
TB --- 2012-07-02 16:52:54 - FreeBSD freebsd-current.sentex.ca 8.3-PRERELEASE
FreeBSD 8.3-PRERELEASE #0: Mon Mar 26 13:54:12 EDT 2012
d...@freebsd-current.sentex.ca:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64
TB ---
TB --- 2012-07-02 16:59:40 - tinderbox 2.9 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca
TB --- 2012-07-02 16:59:40 - FreeBSD freebsd-current.sentex.ca 8.3-PRERELEASE
FreeBSD 8.3-PRERELEASE #0: Mon Mar 26 13:54:12 EDT 2012
d...@freebsd-current.sentex.ca:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64
TB ---
TB --- 2012-07-02 14:30:00 - tinderbox 2.9 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca
TB --- 2012-07-02 14:30:00 - FreeBSD freebsd-current.sentex.ca 8.3-PRERELEASE
FreeBSD 8.3-PRERELEASE #0: Mon Mar 26 13:54:12 EDT 2012
d...@freebsd-current.sentex.ca:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64
TB ---
On Mon, Jul 02, 2012 at 11:03:40AM -0400, Alexander Kabaev wrote:
On Mon, Jul 02, 2012 at 02:12:20AM -0400, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
On Sun, Jul 01, 2012 at 03:52:05PM +0200, Attilio Rao wrote:
anything by SoC involved people about NTFS and certainly I don't see a
plan to get XFS locked.
On Sun, Jul 01, 2012 at 11:14:45AM +0100, Simon L. B. Nielsen wrote:
On 1 Jul 2012, at 10:20, Bjoern A. Zeeb wrote:
Just FYI,
the svn2cvs exporter is currently down due to
http://svn.freebsd.org/changeset/base/237860 .
I'll fix it as soon as I get back from lunch, so should be back in
On 2 Jul 2012, at 22:39, David O'Brien wrote:
On Sun, Jul 01, 2012 at 11:14:45AM +0100, Simon L. B. Nielsen wrote:
On 1 Jul 2012, at 10:20, Bjoern A. Zeeb wrote:
Just FYI,
the svn2cvs exporter is currently down due to
http://svn.freebsd.org/changeset/base/237860 .
I'll fix it as soon as
On 7/2/12 10:03 AM, Alexander Kabaev wrote:
On Mon, Jul 02, 2012 at 02:12:20AM -0400, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
On Sun, Jul 01, 2012 at 03:52:05PM +0200, Attilio Rao wrote:
anything by SoC involved people about NTFS and certainly I don't see a
plan to get XFS locked.
Stupid question, but what
On Mon, 2 Jul 2012 23:12:06 +0300
Konstantin Belousov kostik...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Jul 02, 2012 at 11:03:40AM -0400, Alexander Kabaev wrote:
On Mon, Jul 02, 2012 at 02:12:20AM -0400, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
On Sun, Jul 01, 2012 at 03:52:05PM +0200, Attilio Rao wrote:
anything by
When I built the world as of r237813, clang reported a warning which
caught my attention.
=== sys/boot/zfs (all)
clang -O2 -pipe -march=pentium4 -DBOOTPROG=\zfsloader\
-I/usr/src/sys/boot/zfs/../common -I/usr/src/sys/boot/zfs/../.. -I.
-I/usr/src/sys/boot/zfs/../../../lib/libstand
On Jun 30, 2012, at 3:47 PM, Bruce Cran wrote:
On 28/06/2012 00:11, Devin Teske wrote:
I'd like to announce that I intend to import bsdconfig(8) today.
I haven't seen this get committed yet - was there a problem?
No problems. A long weekend put the damper on the process but it has picked
Hello Matthias Apitz and -current member,
sys/dev/atkbdc/atkbdc_isa.c may not have your keyboard controller's ID.
Run `acpidump -dt` and search your keyboard description.
Is your keyboard controller PNP0303 ?
--
k...@ed.niigata-u.ac.jp
El d$(D+c*$(B Sunday, July 01, 2012 a las
On Mon, Jul 02, 2012 at 10:55:57PM +0100, Simon L. B. Nielsen wrote:
Tested patches are accepted
(http://svnweb.freebsd.org/base/svnadmin/tools/export.py), or even better -
work on killing off CVS sooner rather than later.
I like the latter. :-)
As we discussed at BSDcan -- I don't use CVS
31 matches
Mail list logo
