Sorry fo the delay.
About the ntfs support, I'd go with fuse and leave the most relevant
filesystems in kernel space. In fact filesystems not particulary
specific and not tied our kernel would go to userspace; thinks like
smbfs, nwfs, ntfs, ext2 o ext4 for example should be in
2012/7/18, Gustau Pérez i Querol gpe...@entel.upc.edu:
Sorry fo the delay.
About the ntfs support, I'd go with fuse and leave the most relevant
filesystems in kernel space. In fact filesystems not particulary
specific and not tied our kernel would go to userspace; thinks like
smbfs,
On 07/17/2012 22:54, Gustau Pérez i Querol wrote:
In fact filesystems not particulary specific and not tied our kernel
would go to userspace; thinks like smbfs, nwfs, ntfs, ext2 o ext4 for
example should be in userspace
A big -1 here.
The more native FS support we have the better off we are
Ruslan Mahmatkhanov wrote on 18.06.2012 13:10:
Ivan Klymenko wrote on 18.06.2012 13:02:
В Mon, 18 Jun 2012 12:35:33 +0400
Ruslan Mahmatkhanov cvs-...@yandex.ru пишет:
Good day,
since switching to new drm code (starting at April if I recall
correctly) I'm experiencing sporadic laptop hangs
On Sat, Jun 30, 2012 at 08:53:09PM -0400, Rick Macklem wrote:
I haven't looked at Andrey's patch, but conceptually it sounds like
the best approach. As I understand it, the problem with replacing
mountd with nfse (at least in the FreeBSD source tree) is that nfse
is not 100% backwards
On 07/17/2012 22:54, Gustau Pérez i Querol wrote:
In fact filesystems not particulary specific and not tied our kernel
would go to userspace; thinks like smbfs, nwfs, ntfs, ext2 o ext4 for
example should be in userspace
The list is incomplete and maybe wrong; maybe some should stay in
the
Hm, find the revision where I committed the PCIe powersave fixes to
ath_hal/ar9002/ar9285_attach.c and undo them? See if that has any
effect?
adrian
On 18 July 2012 02:57, Ruslan Mahmatkhanov cvs-...@yandex.ru wrote:
Ruslan Mahmatkhanov wrote on 18.06.2012 13:10:
Ivan Klymenko wrote on
Hi,
I have one of those locked down silvery IPod's, and wanted to try out gnupod
to get some MP3's transferred to the device. I made it once, but then my luck
ended :-) Anyway I found what looks like a remote crash vulnerability in the
IPod firmware. How to make it crash:
1) Plug USB cable
On Tue, Jul 17, 2012 at 10:54 PM, Gustau Pérez i Querol
gpe...@entel.upc.edu wrote:
Sorry fo the delay.
About the ntfs support, I'd go with fuse and leave the most relevant
filesystems in kernel space. In fact filesystems not particulary specific
and not tied our kernel would go to
On Wed, Jul 18, 2012 at 2:22 PM, Hans Petter Selasky hsela...@c2i.net wrote:
Hi,
I have one of those locked down silvery IPod's, and wanted to try out gnupod
to get some MP3's transferred to the device. I made it once, but then my luck
ended :-) Anyway I found what looks like a remote crash
In muc.lists.freebsd.current, you wrote:
On 17 July 2012 20:56, Felix Kohtz felix.ko...@gmail.com wrote:
I recently purchased a VIA EPIA-VE-900 Nano X2 1,4 GHz Dual Core MiniITX
Board
http://www.via.com.tw/en/products/viamainboards/ve900/index.jsp
and wanted to install FreeBSD (amd64) from
11 matches
Mail list logo
