On Thu, 13 Dec 2012 02:08:50 +0900
Daisuke Aoyama aoy...@peach.ne.jp wrote:
Hi,
I've created FreeBSD clang world for RPI based on svn 244112 +
eabi.diff(NOT USE) + few NetBSD code.
I didn't test with -mfloat-abi=softfp but it might work.
If you haven't seen there is the start of FreeBSD ARM
On Tue, Dec 04, 2012 at 04:38:13PM +0100, Johan Hendriks wrote:
Hello all.
I had some spare time so i thought it was a good moment to look at
auditdistd .
One thing i noticed was the default config file location.
The man page and the wiki tells me it is /etc/security/auditdistd
I
I've created FreeBSD clang world for RPI based on svn 244112 +
eabi.diff(NOT USE) + few NetBSD code.
I didn't test with -mfloat-abi=softfp but it might work.
If you haven't seen there is the start of FreeBSD ARM support in clang:
on 12/12/2012 21:35 Dimitry Andric said the following:
Especially the recursive spa_load and traverse_visitbp calls are scary,
because that can grow out of hand very quickly. It is probably tricky
to remove the recursion...
Re-entering spa_load once is normal and is expected.
traverse_visitbp
2012/12/13 Alexander Yerenkow yeren...@gmail.com
Hello there.
I have here 100% reproduceable hangs when run one custom java program.
Can someone look into?
I can give some more info (some other trace) if required.
If someone didn't get attachment - here's link to screenshot
on 13/12/2012 12:46 Alexander Yerenkow said the following:
2012/12/13 Alexander Yerenkow yeren...@gmail.com
Hello there.
I have here 100% reproduceable hangs when run one custom java program.
Can someone look into?
I can give some more info (some other trace) if required.
If someone
on 07/12/2012 02:33 Garrett Cooper said the following:
On Thu, Dec 6, 2012 at 3:08 PM, Garrett Cooper yaneg...@gmail.com wrote:
...
Please document the process to make this work in UPDATING (or at least
the fact that this behavior was changed).
I'm debugging moving from 9.1-RC2 to
on 07/12/2012 02:55 Garrett Cooper said the following:
If I try and let it import the pool at boot it claims the pool is in a
FAULTED state when I point mountroot to /dev/cd0 (one of gjb's
snapshot CDs -- thanks!), run service hostid onestart, etc. If I
export and try to reimport the pool it
12.12.2012 21:35, Dimitry Andric:
On 2012-12-12 14:04, Volodymyr Kostyrko wrote:
04.12.2012 00:41, Konstantin Belousov:
Please try the patch below. It might give an immediate relief, but still
there are many offenders in the backtrace.
I'm having almost the same issue and the patch doesn't
Konstantin Belousov wrote:
On Wed, Dec 12, 2012 at 10:01:39PM -0500, Rick Macklem wrote:
Konstantin Belousov wrote:
On Tue, Dec 11, 2012 at 08:58:47PM -0500, Rick Macklem wrote:
Ok, I'll test r243598 and then r243599 and r243835, just to
see if it really is this.
I'll email
On Wed, 2012-12-12 at 20:52 +0200, Kimmo Paasiala wrote:
On Wed, Dec 12, 2012 at 6:53 PM, Ian Lepore
free...@damnhippie.dyndns.org wrote:
On Wed, 2012-12-12 at 18:14 +0200, Kimmo Paasiala wrote:
Hello,
My 9-STABLE buildworld broke in a very inexplicable way, I was
getting an error on
On Sun, Dec 02, 2012 at 03:43:22PM +, Robert N. M. Watson wrote:
On 2 Dec 2012, at 15:34, Ryan Stone wrote:
On Sun, Dec 2, 2012 at 8:05 AM, Robert Watson rwat...@freebsd.org wrote:
Just to follow up on this thread, since the question has come up a number
of times. mergemaser -p
On Wed, Dec 12, 2012 at 09:01:01AM -0800, Adrian Chadd wrote:
Yes, the qemu bios people decided that they could change the ACPI
setup, in order to make Linux boot slightly (1 line) quieter.
http://git.qemu.org/?p=seabios.git;a=commit;h=4540409d19a4baeec5006d925cfca19f8038a96e
the qemu folks
Oh, phew. :)
adrian
On 13 December 2012 08:29, Luigi Rizzo ri...@iet.unipi.it wrote:
On Wed, Dec 12, 2012 at 09:01:01AM -0800, Adrian Chadd wrote:
Yes, the qemu bios people decided that they could change the ACPI
setup, in order to make Linux boot slightly (1 line) quieter.
Dear all,
I lately see xorg segfault 11s with CURRENT, WITH_NEW_XORG=yes and
WITH_KMS=yes. Interestingly, gdm loads fine but xfce4 at login directly
causes the segfault (log attached), gnome survives a bit longer but
starting any bigger application (e.g. firefox) causes it to crash with the
same
I have a similar problem when running firefox
On Thursday 13 December 2012 15:49:38 Johannes Dieterich wrote:
Dear all,
I lately see xorg segfault 11s with CURRENT, WITH_NEW_XORG=yes and
WITH_KMS=yes. Interestingly, gdm loads fine but xfce4 at login directly
causes the segfault (log
Rebuilding xorg-server with gcc resolves the problem, bt points at libdrm2.
On Thu, Dec 13, 2012 at 10:51 PM, Artyom Mirgorodskiy
art...@ijminteractive.net wrote:
I have a similar problem when running firefox
On Thursday 13 December 2012 15:49:38 Johannes Dieterich wrote:
Dear all,
I
On Thu, Dec 13, 2012 at 12:51 PM, Artyom Mirgorodskiy
art...@ijminteractive.net wrote:
I have a similar problem when running firefox
I don't run into this problem with CURRENT and fluxbox/Firefox on
my Netbook. There's just a nasty misprogrammed region across my screen
that I've been meaning
On Thu, Dec 13, 2012 at 4:01 PM, George Liaskos geo.lias...@gmail.com wrote:
Rebuilding xorg-server with gcc resolves the problem, bt points at libdrm2.
So basically this is a regression from the previous clang3.1 to the
clang3.2 import then?
Is anyone of the clang guys aware of this?
On Thu,
On Thu, Dec 13, 2012 at 1:03 PM, Garrett Cooper yaneg...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Dec 13, 2012 at 12:51 PM, Artyom Mirgorodskiy
art...@ijminteractive.net wrote:
I have a similar problem when running firefox
I don't run into this problem with CURRENT and fluxbox/Firefox on
my Netbook.
Hello everyone,
I'm afraid I still don't know what exactly BAR is, or how I get its value that
I'm supposed to plug into the line John provided:
dd if=/dev/mem bs=4 iseek=((start of bar + reg offset)/4) count=1 | hd
I assumed that start of bar is 0xfdee in my case, since dmesg reports
ath0:
On 13 December 2012 13:11, hu...@hush.com wrote:
Hello everyone,
I'm afraid I still don't know what exactly BAR is, or how I get its value
that I'm supposed to plug into the line John provided:
dd if=/dev/mem bs=4 iseek=((start of bar + reg offset)/4) count=1 | hd
I assumed that start of
On 2012-12-13 21:49, Johannes Dieterich wrote:
I lately see xorg segfault 11s with CURRENT, WITH_NEW_XORG=yes and
WITH_KMS=yes. Interestingly, gdm loads fine but xfce4 at login directly
causes the segfault (log attached), gnome survives a bit longer but
starting any bigger application (e.g.
On 12/13/12 16:36, Dimitry Andric wrote:
On 2012-12-13 21:49, Johannes Dieterich wrote:
I lately see xorg segfault 11s with CURRENT, WITH_NEW_XORG=yes and
WITH_KMS=yes. Interestingly, gdm loads fine but xfce4 at login directly
causes the segfault (log attached), gnome survives a bit longer but
On 13 Dec 2012, at 21:48, Johannes Dieterich wrote:
GNU gdb 6.1.1 [FreeBSD]
You might try with gdb 7.x from ports. gdb 6.1.1 from the base system doesn't
do a good job of understanding the newer version of DWARF that clang emits.
David
___
On 12/13/12 22:48, Johannes Dieterich wrote:
On 12/13/12 16:36, Dimitry Andric wrote:
On 2012-12-13 21:49, Johannes Dieterich wrote:
I lately see xorg segfault 11s with CURRENT, WITH_NEW_XORG=yes and
WITH_KMS=yes. Interestingly, gdm loads fine but xfce4 at login directly
causes the segfault
On 12/13/12 16:53, David Chisnall wrote:
On 13 Dec 2012, at 21:48, Johannes Dieterich wrote:
GNU gdb 6.1.1 [FreeBSD]
You might try with gdb 7.x from ports. gdb 6.1.1 from the base system doesn't
do a good job of understanding the newer version of DWARF that clang emits.
Did that but it
I have recompile xorg-server with WITH_DEBUG=yes and did not get crash
On Thursday 13 December 2012 22:36:24 Dimitry Andric wrote:
On 2012-12-13 21:49, Johannes Dieterich wrote:
I lately see xorg segfault 11s with CURRENT, WITH_NEW_XORG=yes and
WITH_KMS=yes. Interestingly, gdm loads fine but
On Thu, Dec 13, 2012 at 3:20 AM, Andriy Gapon a...@freebsd.org wrote:
...
One thing that I recommend to all ZFS users is to make use of boot
environments.
They are very easy, very convenient and may save a lot of trouble.
Use either any of the tool available in ports (e.g. sysutils/beadm)
On Thu, Dec 13, 2012 at 3:24 AM, Andriy Gapon a...@freebsd.org wrote:
...
This sounds messy, not sure if it has any informative value.
I think I've seen something like this after some reason ZFS import from
upsteam
when my kernel and userland were out of sync.
Do you do a full boot from
On Thu, Dec 13, 2012 at 2:49 PM, Garrett Cooper yaneg...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Dec 13, 2012 at 3:20 AM, Andriy Gapon a...@freebsd.org wrote:
...
One thing that I recommend to all ZFS users is to make use of boot
environments.
They are very easy, very convenient and may save a lot of
On Thu, Dec 13, 2012 at 4:13 PM, Ian Lepore
free...@damnhippie.dyndns.org wrote:
On Wed, 2012-12-12 at 20:52 +0200, Kimmo Paasiala wrote:
On Wed, Dec 12, 2012 at 6:53 PM, Ian Lepore
free...@damnhippie.dyndns.org wrote:
On Wed, 2012-12-12 at 18:14 +0200, Kimmo Paasiala wrote:
Hello,
My
On 12/13/12 23:03, Johannes Dieterich wrote:
On 12/13/12 16:53, David Chisnall wrote:
On 13 Dec 2012, at 21:48, Johannes Dieterich wrote:
GNU gdb 6.1.1 [FreeBSD]
You might try with gdb 7.x from ports. gdb 6.1.1 from the base system
doesn't do a good job of understanding the newer version
Yesterday I updated source and when running installkernel it
complained about no auditdistd user, so I ran 'mergemaster -p'.
Then the kernel installed and I rebooted.
Before running installworld I ran 'mergemaster -p' again and this
time, if I recall correctly, it produced a new group.
I ran
Hi.
This patch takes callout(9) and redesign the KPI and the
implementation. The main objective of this work is making the
subsystem tickless. In the last several years, this possibility has
been discussed widely (http://markmail.org/message/q3xmr2ttlzpqkmae),
but until now noone really
Can you please try the attached patch, against x11-servers/xorg-server.
Apply it and recompile xorg-server with normal flags (that is, no
debugging) and let me and the list know the result when starting X.
Regards!
--
Niclas Zeising
Index: x11-servers/xorg-server/Makefile
This patch work for me. Thanks.
On Friday 14 December 2012 00:30:52 Niclas Zeising wrote:
Can you please try the attached patch, against x11-servers/xorg-server.
Apply it and recompile xorg-server with normal flags (that is, no
debugging) and let me and the list know the result when starting
On Thu, Dec 13, 2012 at 6:51 PM, Artyom Mirgorodskiy
art...@ijminteractive.net wrote:
This patch work for me. Thanks.
I can confirm that it also works for me. Thanks a lot!
On Friday 14 December 2012 00:30:52 Niclas Zeising wrote:
Can you please try the attached patch, against
Konstantin Belousov wrote:
On Wed, Dec 12, 2012 at 10:01:39PM -0500, Rick Macklem wrote:
Konstantin Belousov wrote:
On Tue, Dec 11, 2012 at 08:58:47PM -0500, Rick Macklem wrote:
Ok, I'll test r243598 and then r243599 and r243835, just to
see if it really is this.
I'll email
On Thu, Dec 13, 2012 at 10:14:29PM -0500, Rick Macklem wrote:
Good work. This patch seems to have done the trick. I've run
quite a few kernel build cycles without a hang. I'll keep running
them, but I would have expected to see a hang by now.
Maybe Tim can test the patch as well?
(I needed
TB --- 2012-12-13 22:40:00 - tinderbox 2.9 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca
TB --- 2012-12-13 22:40:00 - FreeBSD freebsd-current.sentex.ca 8.3-PRERELEASE
FreeBSD 8.3-PRERELEASE #0: Mon Mar 26 13:54:12 EDT 2012
d...@freebsd-current.sentex.ca:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64
TB ---
TB --- 2012-12-13 22:40:00 - tinderbox 2.9 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca
TB --- 2012-12-13 22:40:00 - FreeBSD freebsd-current.sentex.ca 8.3-PRERELEASE
FreeBSD 8.3-PRERELEASE #0: Mon Mar 26 13:54:12 EDT 2012
d...@freebsd-current.sentex.ca:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64
TB ---
On Fri, Dec 14, 2012 at 12:12 AM, Davide Italiano dav...@freebsd.orgwrote:
Hi.
This patch takes callout(9) and redesign the KPI and the
implementation. The main objective of this work is making the
subsystem tickless. In the last several years, this possibility has
been discussed widely
43 matches
Mail list logo
