[head tinderbox] failure on powerpc/powerpc

2013-02-16 Thread FreeBSD Tinderbox
TB --- 2013-02-16 07:26:34 - tinderbox 2.10 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca TB --- 2013-02-16 07:26:34 - FreeBSD freebsd-current.sentex.ca 8.3-PRERELEASE FreeBSD 8.3-PRERELEASE #0: Mon Mar 26 13:54:12 EDT 2012 d...@freebsd-current.sentex.ca:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64 TB ---

Unable to build audio/sox: undefined reference to 'open_memstream'

2013-02-16 Thread Ian FREISLICH
Hi I get this error building building sox on amd64, but not i386. CC is gcc on both systems. I can't figure out what the configure options difference is between the two hosts that has it fail on the amd64 system. All the dependencies have the same options configured. /bin/sh ../libtool

[head tinderbox] failure on powerpc64/powerpc

2013-02-16 Thread FreeBSD Tinderbox
TB --- 2013-02-16 08:06:17 - tinderbox 2.10 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca TB --- 2013-02-16 08:06:17 - FreeBSD freebsd-current.sentex.ca 8.3-PRERELEASE FreeBSD 8.3-PRERELEASE #0: Mon Mar 26 13:54:12 EDT 2012 d...@freebsd-current.sentex.ca:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64 TB ---

[head tinderbox] failure on sparc64/sparc64

2013-02-16 Thread FreeBSD Tinderbox
TB --- 2013-02-16 08:48:58 - tinderbox 2.10 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca TB --- 2013-02-16 08:48:58 - FreeBSD freebsd-current.sentex.ca 8.3-PRERELEASE FreeBSD 8.3-PRERELEASE #0: Mon Mar 26 13:54:12 EDT 2012 d...@freebsd-current.sentex.ca:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64 TB ---

Re: Possible bug in NFSv4 with krb5p security?

2013-02-16 Thread Elias Mårtenson
OK, here I am replying to my own email. I just want to mention that I removed the ports version of Heimdal, but with no change in behaviour. On 16 February 2013 09:38, Elias Mårtenson loke...@gmail.com wrote: On 16 Feb, 2013 1:42 AM, Benjamin Kaduk ka...@mit.edu wrote: And yet one more

Re: HEAD memsticks broken? [USB/CAM Problems?]

2013-02-16 Thread Joel Dahl
On 14-02-2013 20:37, Joel Dahl wrote: On 12-02-2013 8:51, Hans Petter Selasky wrote: On Monday 11 February 2013 23:21:05 Joel Dahl wrote: On 10-02-2013 0:09, Joel Dahl wrote: On 09-02-2013 20:28, Alexander Motin wrote: How long ago that HEAD was built? Could you get full dmesg? I

Re: Possible bug in NFSv4 with krb5p security?

2013-02-16 Thread Doug Rabson
This may be a stupid question but does the user 'elias' exist in the local password database? If you are using heimdal from the base distribution and you have source, you should be able to build them with debug information which may help. When I was writing gssd, I mostly ran it under gdb to

[head tinderbox] failure on armv6/arm

2013-02-16 Thread FreeBSD Tinderbox
TB --- 2013-02-16 11:50:26 - tinderbox 2.10 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca TB --- 2013-02-16 11:50:26 - FreeBSD freebsd-current.sentex.ca 8.3-PRERELEASE FreeBSD 8.3-PRERELEASE #0: Mon Mar 26 13:54:12 EDT 2012 d...@freebsd-current.sentex.ca:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64 TB ---

[head tinderbox] failure on arm/arm

2013-02-16 Thread FreeBSD Tinderbox
TB --- 2013-02-16 11:50:26 - tinderbox 2.10 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca TB --- 2013-02-16 11:50:26 - FreeBSD freebsd-current.sentex.ca 8.3-PRERELEASE FreeBSD 8.3-PRERELEASE #0: Mon Mar 26 13:54:12 EDT 2012 d...@freebsd-current.sentex.ca:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64 TB ---

Re: r24684: /usr/src/lib/libldns/../../contrib/ldns/buffer.c:10:10: fatal error: 'ldns/config.h' file not found

2013-02-16 Thread Daniel Nebdal
That looks like a slightly different issue, though? r246855 built for me last night, for what it's worth - though I'm not sure if that was with -Werror. On Sat, Feb 16, 2013 at 12:14 AM, Michael Butler i...@protected-networks.net wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On

gpart, slice starts at 0

2013-02-16 Thread Erich Dollansky
Hi, I did this to get a disk partitioned: #!/bin/tcsh ### # # File name:FormatSamsung160GB # # Description: This script formats a thumb drive connected as da0 #

[head tinderbox] failure on ia64/ia64

2013-02-16 Thread FreeBSD Tinderbox
TB --- 2013-02-16 12:24:14 - tinderbox 2.10 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca TB --- 2013-02-16 12:24:14 - FreeBSD freebsd-current.sentex.ca 8.3-PRERELEASE FreeBSD 8.3-PRERELEASE #0: Mon Mar 26 13:54:12 EDT 2012 d...@freebsd-current.sentex.ca:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64 TB ---

Re: r24684: /usr/src/lib/libldns/../../contrib/ldns/buffer.c:10:10: fatal error: 'ldns/config.h' file not found

2013-02-16 Thread Michael Butler
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 02/16/13 07:25, Daniel Nebdal wrote: That looks like a slightly different issue, though? r246855 built for me last night, for what it's worth - though I'm not sure if that was with -Werror. On Sat, Feb 16, 2013 at 12:14 AM, Michael Butler

Re: gpart, slice starts at 0

2013-02-16 Thread Erich Dollansky
Hi, On Sat, 16 Feb 2013 14:51:22 +0700 Erich Dollansky er...@alogt.com wrote: I did this to get a disk partitioned: #!/bin/tcsh ### # # File name: FormatSamsung160GB # # Description:This script

[head tinderbox] failure on mips/mips

2013-02-16 Thread FreeBSD Tinderbox
TB --- 2013-02-16 13:00:16 - tinderbox 2.10 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca TB --- 2013-02-16 13:00:16 - FreeBSD freebsd-current.sentex.ca 8.3-PRERELEASE FreeBSD 8.3-PRERELEASE #0: Mon Mar 26 13:54:12 EDT 2012 d...@freebsd-current.sentex.ca:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64 TB ---

[head tinderbox] failure on mips64/mips

2013-02-16 Thread FreeBSD Tinderbox
TB --- 2013-02-16 13:28:37 - tinderbox 2.10 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca TB --- 2013-02-16 13:28:37 - FreeBSD freebsd-current.sentex.ca 8.3-PRERELEASE FreeBSD 8.3-PRERELEASE #0: Mon Mar 26 13:54:12 EDT 2012 d...@freebsd-current.sentex.ca:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64 TB ---

Re: Possible bug in NFSv4 with krb5p security?

2013-02-16 Thread Elias Mårtenson
On 16 February 2013 18:58, Doug Rabson d...@rabson.org wrote: This may be a stupid question but does the user 'elias' exist in the local password database? If you are using heimdal from the base distribution and you have source, you should be able to build them with debug information which

[head tinderbox] failure on powerpc/powerpc

2013-02-16 Thread FreeBSD Tinderbox
TB --- 2013-02-16 13:56:41 - tinderbox 2.10 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca TB --- 2013-02-16 13:56:41 - FreeBSD freebsd-current.sentex.ca 8.3-PRERELEASE FreeBSD 8.3-PRERELEASE #0: Mon Mar 26 13:54:12 EDT 2012 d...@freebsd-current.sentex.ca:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64 TB ---

llvm-config in base

2013-02-16 Thread paranormal
Is there any plan to include llvm-config in base? I'd like to use base version instead of ports version because base has already clang built :). ___ freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current To

[head tinderbox] failure on powerpc64/powerpc

2013-02-16 Thread FreeBSD Tinderbox
TB --- 2013-02-16 14:35:34 - tinderbox 2.10 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca TB --- 2013-02-16 14:35:34 - FreeBSD freebsd-current.sentex.ca 8.3-PRERELEASE FreeBSD 8.3-PRERELEASE #0: Mon Mar 26 13:54:12 EDT 2012 d...@freebsd-current.sentex.ca:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64 TB ---

Re: llvm-config in base

2013-02-16 Thread Dimitry Andric
On 2013-02-16 15:04, paranormal wrote: Is there any plan to include llvm-config in base? No. Please search the list archives for the reasons why; this has been discussed before. If you want to have the full llvm libraries and headers, simply install the port. It is extremely easy to do.

Re: gpart, slice starts at 0

2013-02-16 Thread Warren Block
On Sat, 16 Feb 2013, Erich Dollansky wrote: I did this to get a disk partitioned: #!/bin/tcsh Gah! gpart destroy -F da0 diskinfo da0 dd if=/dev/zero of=/dev/da0 bs=512 count=34 dd if=/dev/zero of=/dev/da0 bs=512 count=34 seek=312581774 Someone here on the lists (I unfortunately forget

[head tinderbox] failure on sparc64/sparc64

2013-02-16 Thread FreeBSD Tinderbox
TB --- 2013-02-16 15:17:09 - tinderbox 2.10 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca TB --- 2013-02-16 15:17:09 - FreeBSD freebsd-current.sentex.ca 8.3-PRERELEASE FreeBSD 8.3-PRERELEASE #0: Mon Mar 26 13:54:12 EDT 2012 d...@freebsd-current.sentex.ca:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64 TB ---

Re: Possible bug in NFSv4 with krb5p security?

2013-02-16 Thread Doug Rabson
On 16 February 2013 13:57, Elias Mårtenson loke...@gmail.com wrote: On 16 February 2013 18:58, Doug Rabson d...@rabson.org wrote: This may be a stupid question but does the user 'elias' exist in the local password database? If you are using heimdal from the base distribution and you have

Re: the latest version of Clang/LLVM for the world and kernel

2013-02-16 Thread Dimitry Andric
On 2013-02-16 00:04, deeptech71 wrote: ... Another purpose is development. Developers will have to import the next version of Clang/LLVM sooner or later. Let's hedge against the developer-time requirements in case the next version of Clang gets released just before a particular version of

Re: Possible bug in NFSv4 with krb5p security?

2013-02-16 Thread Elias Mårtenson
On 17 February 2013 00:03, Doug Rabson d...@rabson.org wrote: I don't think much (if anything) has changed with gssd between 9.1 and current. When your gssd hangs, you can try to get a stack trace using gdb's attach command. Fair enough. However, when it hangs, I have at least a 50% chance

Re: Possible bug in NFSv4 with krb5p security?

2013-02-16 Thread Doug Rabson
On 16 February 2013 16:18, Elias Mårtenson loke...@gmail.com wrote: On 17 February 2013 00:03, Doug Rabson d...@rabson.org wrote: I don't think much (if anything) has changed with gssd between 9.1 and current. When your gssd hangs, you can try to get a stack trace using gdb's attach command.

[head tinderbox] failure on armv6/arm

2013-02-16 Thread FreeBSD Tinderbox
TB --- 2013-02-16 18:10:37 - tinderbox 2.10 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca TB --- 2013-02-16 18:10:37 - FreeBSD freebsd-current.sentex.ca 8.3-PRERELEASE FreeBSD 8.3-PRERELEASE #0: Mon Mar 26 13:54:12 EDT 2012 d...@freebsd-current.sentex.ca:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64 TB ---

[head tinderbox] failure on arm/arm

2013-02-16 Thread FreeBSD Tinderbox
TB --- 2013-02-16 18:10:37 - tinderbox 2.10 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca TB --- 2013-02-16 18:10:37 - FreeBSD freebsd-current.sentex.ca 8.3-PRERELEASE FreeBSD 8.3-PRERELEASE #0: Mon Mar 26 13:54:12 EDT 2012 d...@freebsd-current.sentex.ca:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64 TB ---

[head tinderbox] failure on ia64/ia64

2013-02-16 Thread FreeBSD Tinderbox
TB --- 2013-02-16 18:44:24 - tinderbox 2.10 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca TB --- 2013-02-16 18:44:24 - FreeBSD freebsd-current.sentex.ca 8.3-PRERELEASE FreeBSD 8.3-PRERELEASE #0: Mon Mar 26 13:54:12 EDT 2012 d...@freebsd-current.sentex.ca:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64 TB ---

[head tinderbox] failure on mips/mips

2013-02-16 Thread FreeBSD Tinderbox
TB --- 2013-02-16 19:20:32 - tinderbox 2.10 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca TB --- 2013-02-16 19:20:32 - FreeBSD freebsd-current.sentex.ca 8.3-PRERELEASE FreeBSD 8.3-PRERELEASE #0: Mon Mar 26 13:54:12 EDT 2012 d...@freebsd-current.sentex.ca:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64 TB ---

[head tinderbox] failure on mips64/mips

2013-02-16 Thread FreeBSD Tinderbox
TB --- 2013-02-16 19:48:46 - tinderbox 2.10 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca TB --- 2013-02-16 19:48:46 - FreeBSD freebsd-current.sentex.ca 8.3-PRERELEASE FreeBSD 8.3-PRERELEASE #0: Mon Mar 26 13:54:12 EDT 2012 d...@freebsd-current.sentex.ca:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64 TB ---

[head tinderbox] failure on powerpc/powerpc

2013-02-16 Thread FreeBSD Tinderbox
TB --- 2013-02-16 20:16:52 - tinderbox 2.10 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca TB --- 2013-02-16 20:16:52 - FreeBSD freebsd-current.sentex.ca 8.3-PRERELEASE FreeBSD 8.3-PRERELEASE #0: Mon Mar 26 13:54:12 EDT 2012 d...@freebsd-current.sentex.ca:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64 TB ---

[head tinderbox] failure on powerpc64/powerpc

2013-02-16 Thread FreeBSD Tinderbox
TB --- 2013-02-16 20:56:04 - tinderbox 2.10 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca TB --- 2013-02-16 20:56:04 - FreeBSD freebsd-current.sentex.ca 8.3-PRERELEASE FreeBSD 8.3-PRERELEASE #0: Mon Mar 26 13:54:12 EDT 2012 d...@freebsd-current.sentex.ca:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64 TB ---

Re: [head tinderbox] failure on powerpc64/powerpc

2013-02-16 Thread Dag-Erling Smørgrav
FreeBSD Tinderbox tinder...@freebsd.org writes: cc -O2 -pipe -I/src/lib/libldns/../../contrib/ldns -std=gnu99 -fstack-protector -Wsystem-headers -Werror -Wall -Wno-format-y2k -W -Wno-unused-parameter -Wstrict-prototypes -Wmissing-prototypes -Wpointer-arith -Wno-uninitialized

[head tinderbox] failure on sparc64/sparc64

2013-02-16 Thread FreeBSD Tinderbox
TB --- 2013-02-16 21:37:49 - tinderbox 2.10 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca TB --- 2013-02-16 21:37:49 - FreeBSD freebsd-current.sentex.ca 8.3-PRERELEASE FreeBSD 8.3-PRERELEASE #0: Mon Mar 26 13:54:12 EDT 2012 d...@freebsd-current.sentex.ca:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64 TB ---

Re: Possible bug in NFSv4 with krb5p security?

2013-02-16 Thread Rick Macklem
Doug Rabson wrote: On 16 February 2013 13:57, Elias Mårtenson loke...@gmail.com wrote: On 16 February 2013 18:58, Doug Rabson d...@rabson.org wrote: This may be a stupid question but does the user 'elias' exist in the local password database? If you are using heimdal from the base

Re: gpart, slice starts at 0

2013-02-16 Thread Erich Dollansky
Hi, On Sat, 16 Feb 2013 08:44:50 -0700 (MST) Warren Block wbl...@wonkity.com wrote: On Sat, 16 Feb 2013, Erich Dollansky wrote: I did this to get a disk partitioned: #!/bin/tcsh Gah! it is a generated script. gpart destroy -F da0 diskinfo da0 dd if=/dev/zero of=/dev/da0

Re: [RFC/RFT] calloutng

2013-02-16 Thread Luigi Rizzo
On Thu, Feb 14, 2013 at 11:56:54PM -0800, Alfred Perlstein wrote: [ added Luigi Rizzo to thread ] On 2/11/13 12:26 PM, Davide Italiano wrote: [trimmed old mails] Here's a new version of the patch: http://people.freebsd.org/~davide/patches/calloutng-11022012.diff Significant bits

Re: Running out of bits p_flag (sys/sys/proc.h)

2013-02-16 Thread Davide Italiano
On Sun, Feb 17, 2013 at 2:58 AM, hiren panchasara hiren.panchas...@gmail.com wrote: With revision=246484, it seems we have hit the limit. At $WORK we have one more flag and to accommodate that we need to bump this up. Can p_flag be bumped up to u_long? Index: proc.h

Re: Running out of bits p_flag (sys/sys/proc.h)

2013-02-16 Thread Konstantin Belousov
On Sun, Feb 17, 2013 at 04:25:22AM +0100, Davide Italiano wrote: On Sun, Feb 17, 2013 at 2:58 AM, hiren panchasara hiren.panchas...@gmail.com wrote: With revision=246484, it seems we have hit the limit. At $WORK we have one more flag and to accommodate that we need to bump this up.