Hi,
I think the xHCI host controller driver has a spec violation.
Could you refer to
``Table 126: Offset 0Ch – Link TRB Field Definitions''
in xHCI_Specification_for_USB.pdf(Revision 1.0)?
The following is an excerpt about the CHAIN BIT.
Chain bit (CH). Set to ‘1’ by software to
On 12/11/13 11:12, Kohji Okuno wrote:
Hi,
I think the xHCI host controller driver has a spec violation.
Could you refer to
``Table 126: Offset 0Ch – Link TRB Field Definitions''
in xHCI_Specification_for_USB.pdf(Revision 1.0)?
The following is an excerpt about the CHAIN BIT.
Chain bit
On 12/11/13 11:12, Kohji Okuno wrote:
Hi,
I think the xHCI host controller driver has a spec violation.
Could you refer to
``Table 126: Offset 0Ch – Link TRB Field Definitions''
in xHCI_Specification_for_USB.pdf(Revision 1.0)?
The following is an excerpt about the CHAIN BIT.
On 12/11/13 12:12, Kohji Okuno wrote:
On 12/11/13 11:12, Kohji Okuno wrote:
Hi,
I think the xHCI host controller driver has a spec violation.
Could you refer to
``Table 126: Offset 0Ch – Link TRB Field Definitions''
in xHCI_Specification_for_USB.pdf(Revision 1.0)?
The following is an
On 12/11/13 13:44, Hans Petter Selasky wrote:
On 12/11/13 12:12, Kohji Okuno wrote:
On 12/11/13 11:12, Kohji Okuno wrote:
Hi,
I think the xHCI host controller driver has a spec violation.
Could you refer to
``Table 126: Offset 0Ch – Link TRB Field Definitions''
in
From: Hans Petter Selasky h...@bitfrost.no
Date: Wed, 11 Dec 2013 13:44:37 +0100
On 12/11/13 12:12, Kohji Okuno wrote:
On 12/11/13 11:12, Kohji Okuno wrote:
Hi,
I think the xHCI host controller driver has a spec violation.
Could you refer to
``Table 126: Offset 0Ch – Link TRB Field
From: Hans Petter Selasky h...@bitfrost.no
Date: Wed, 11 Dec 2013 13:50:50 +0100
On 12/11/13 13:44, Hans Petter Selasky wrote:
On 12/11/13 12:12, Kohji Okuno wrote:
On 12/11/13 11:12, Kohji Okuno wrote:
Hi,
I think the xHCI host controller driver has a spec violation.
Could you refer to
On Sun, Dec 08, 2013 at 03:48:54PM -0800, Justin Hibbits wrote:
On Sun, 8 Dec 2013 14:38:53 +0100
Marius Strobl mar...@alchemy.franken.de wrote:
On Wed, Dec 04, 2013 at 10:21:13PM -0800, Justin Hibbits wrote:
I've been working on the projects/pmac_pmu branch for some time now
to add
On 12/11/13, 8:24 AM, Eitan Adler wrote:
On Tue, Dec 10, 2013 at 7:04 PM, Rick Macklem rmack...@uoguelph.ca wrote:
Hi,
I just tried to MFC into stable/10 and it worked, but with
a lot of mergeinfo. I know diddly about svn, so is this ok?
Starting with stable/10 and later you must merge into
On Wed, Dec 11, 2013 at 8:53 AM, Julian Elischer jul...@freebsd.org wrote:
On 12/11/13, 8:24 AM, Eitan Adler wrote:
On Tue, Dec 10, 2013 at 7:04 PM, Rick Macklem rmack...@uoguelph.ca
wrote:
Hi,
I just tried to MFC into stable/10 and it worked, but with
a lot of mergeinfo. I know diddly
On 12/11/13 14:06, Kohji Okuno wrote:
Hi HPS,
All link trbs which are not the end need CHAIN bit, I think.
But, this is errata in xHCI ver 0.95. So, linux has quirk for chain
bit. Could you check linux codes?
Regards,
Kohji Okuno
Hi Kohji,
I went through the Linux codes a bit, and I see
This looks like it fixes my -CURRENT crash..
Thanks GNN/JHB
On Wed, Dec 11, 2013 at 05:18:10PM +, George V. Neville-Neil wrote:
Author: gnn
Date: Wed Dec 11 17:18:10 2013
New Revision: 259221
URL: http://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/259221
Log:
Fix a panic when booting with
On Thursday, December 05, 2013 1:21:13 am Justin Hibbits wrote:
I've been working on the projects/pmac_pmu branch for some time now to
add suspend/resume as well as CPU speed change for certain PowerPC
machines, about a year since I created the branch, and now it's stable
enough that I want to
On Wed, Dec 11, 2013 at 1:26 PM, John Baldwin j...@freebsd.org wrote:
On Thursday, December 05, 2013 1:21:13 am Justin Hibbits wrote:
I've been working on the projects/pmac_pmu branch for some time now to
add suspend/resume as well as CPU speed change for certain PowerPC
machines, about a year
From: Hans Petter Selasky h...@bitfrost.no
Date: Wed, 11 Dec 2013 15:04:42 +0100
On 12/11/13 14:06, Kohji Okuno wrote:
Hi HPS,
All link trbs which are not the end need CHAIN bit, I think.
But, this is errata in xHCI ver 0.95. So, linux has quirk for chain
bit. Could you check linux codes?
On Dec 11, 2013, at 1:26 PM, John Baldwin j...@freebsd.org wrote:
Also, I'm still not a fan of the EAGAIN approach. I'd rather have a method
in bus_if.m to suspend or resume a single device and to track that a device
is suspended or resumed via a device_t flag or some such. (I think I had
On 12/12/13 01:59, Kohji Okuno wrote:
From: Hans Petter Selasky h...@bitfrost.no
Date: Wed, 11 Dec 2013 15:04:42 +0100
On 12/11/13 14:06, Kohji Okuno wrote:
Hi HPS,
All link trbs which are not the end need CHAIN bit, I think.
But, this is errata in xHCI ver 0.95. So, linux has quirk for
From: Hans Petter Selasky h...@bitfrost.no
Date: Thu, 12 Dec 2013 08:15:02 +0100
On 12/12/13 01:59, Kohji Okuno wrote:
From: Hans Petter Selasky h...@bitfrost.no
Date: Wed, 11 Dec 2013 15:04:42 +0100
On 12/11/13 14:06, Kohji Okuno wrote:
Hi HPS,
All link trbs which are not the end need
On 12/12/13 08:15, Hans Petter Selasky wrote:
On 12/12/13 01:59, Kohji Okuno wrote:
Hi Kohji,
Did you check using a USB analyzer what the difference is when setting
the CHAIN bit and not setting the chain bit?
I would guess that if you set the CHAIN-bit in this case, no ZLP will be
sent,
19 matches
Mail list logo
