Re: Ver 2 of the patch [was: Re: i915 driver update testing]

2014-10-25 Thread Jia-Shiun Li
On Fri, Oct 24, 2014 at 3:03 AM, Konstantin Belousov kostik...@gmail.com wrote: Due to my mistake during the patch generation, i915.5.patch is just a garbage. Use https://www.kib.kiev.ua/kib/drm/i915.6.patch. I already have one private report of the patch worked from person who got the same

Some NFS server V4 questions

2014-10-25 Thread Beeblebrox
* I can't get the NFS server to run V4 only. I have: sysctl vfs.nfsd.server_min_nfsvers=4 I start all NFS-related services manually (from script) #!/bin/sh rpcbind -s -h 192.168.2.1 mountd -rnl -h 192.168.2.1 nfsd -ut -n 4 -h 192.168.2.1 nfsuserd /etc/exports has: V4: / -network

Re: can't build CURRENT/amd64 using 9.3?

2014-10-25 Thread owner-freebsd-current
Garrett Cooper writes: The message is telling you (indirectly) that you need to run make buildworld successfully first? Recapping: Current system: FreeBSD 9.3-RELEASE #0 r268512: Fri Jul 11 03:13:02 UTC 2014 i386 Source tree at CURRENT/r273626. No

Re: can't build CURRENT/amd64 using 9.3?

2014-10-25 Thread Ian Lepore
On Fri, 2014-10-24 at 21:06 -0400, owner-freebsd-curr...@freebsd.org wrote: roberth...@rcn.com writes: I am now doing make buildkernel with TARGET/TARGET_ARCH on the command line. For installkernel, do I need to use them also, or will it magically know where to look?

Re: Some NFS server V4 questions

2014-10-25 Thread Russell L. Carter
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 10/25/14 03:07, Beeblebrox wrote: * I can't get the NFS server to run V4 only. I have: sysctl vfs.nfsd.server_min_nfsvers=4 [...] PXE client's /etc/fstab is: 92.168.2.1:/data/amd64 / nfs ro 0 0 192.168.2.1:/usr/local

Re: Some NFS server V4 questions

2014-10-25 Thread Beeblebrox
Hi Russ, PXE client's /etc/fstab is: 92.168.2.1:/data/amd64 / nfs ro 0 0 192.168.2.1:/usr/local /usr/local nfs ro 0 Possibly need to arrange for mount_nfs to see -o nfsv4 (I use mount_nfs -o nfsv4,minorversion=1) Yeah, that would work very likely and thanks. From

Re: Some NFS server V4 questions

2014-10-25 Thread Russell L. Carter
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 10/25/14 09:58, Beeblebrox wrote: Hi Russ, PXE client's /etc/fstab is: 92.168.2.1:/data/amd64 / nfs ro 0 0 192.168.2.1:/usr/local /usr/local nfs ro 0 Possibly need to arrange for mount_nfs to see -o nfsv4 (I use

junior kernel tasks

2014-10-25 Thread Mateusz Guzik
Hello, In short, nice kernel tasks people with C language skills can do in few evenings. https://wiki.freebsd.org/JuniorJobs It is assumed you know how to obtain sources and build the kernel. What you can get in return: - your own code in FreeBSD tree - eternal glory [1] - fun [2] If you are

Re: Ver 2 of the patch [was: Re: i915 driver update testing]

2014-10-25 Thread Johannes Dieterich
Hi, I can confirm v6 of the patch works for me with a r273559 kernel on a i5-3320M notebook as well. Only interesting new output to messages: Oct 25 23:11:19 kernel: error: [drm:pid1159:gen6_sanitize_pm] *ERROR* Power management discrepancy: GEN6_RP_INTERRUPT_LIMITS expected 0007, was

Re: Some NFS server V4 questions

2014-10-25 Thread Rick Macklem
Beeblebrox wrote: * I can't get the NFS server to run V4 only. I have: sysctl vfs.nfsd.server_min_nfsvers=4 Hmm. With this set the NFS server shouldn't accept V2, 3 RPCs. The mount will work, since that is done by the Mount protocol (mountd), but the client should be saying server not

Re: Some NFS server V4 questions

2014-10-25 Thread Rick Macklem
Russell L. Carter wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 10/25/14 03:07, Beeblebrox wrote: * I can't get the NFS server to run V4 only. I have: sysctl vfs.nfsd.server_min_nfsvers=4 [...] PXE client's /etc/fstab is: 92.168.2.1:/data/amd64 / nfs ro

Re: Some NFS server V4 questions

2014-10-25 Thread Rick Macklem
Russell L. Carter wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 10/25/14 09:58, Beeblebrox wrote: Hi Russ, PXE client's /etc/fstab is: 92.168.2.1:/data/amd64 / nfs ro 0 0 192.168.2.1:/usr/local /usr/local nfs ro 0 Possibly need to arrange for

Re: RFC: getting rid of oldnfs

2014-10-25 Thread Rick Macklem
Kostik wrote: On Fri, Oct 24, 2014 at 04:43:28PM +0100, Robert Watson wrote: On Thu, 23 Oct 2014, Rick Macklem wrote: Someone just pinged me on this and I figured I should bring it up. 1 - Is anyone out there still using oldnfs due to unresolved problems with the new one?

buildkernel fails on head

2014-10-25 Thread Maxim V FIlimonov
I'm trying to build the current FreeBSD kernel, and that's what I get: % sudo make buildkernel -- Kernel build for GENERIC started on Sun Oct 26 01:39:13 MSK 2014 -- ===

Re: Some NFS server V4 questions

2014-10-25 Thread Rick Macklem
Russell L. Carter wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 10/25/14 09:58, Beeblebrox wrote: Hi Russ, PXE client's /etc/fstab is: 92.168.2.1:/data/amd64 / nfs ro 0 0 192.168.2.1:/usr/local /usr/local nfs ro 0 Possibly need to arrange for

Re: HEADS UP: Merging projects/bhyve_svm to HEAD

2014-10-25 Thread Zaphod Beeblebrox
I tried to integrate this patch into 10.1_RC3 and I failed. Is there a timeframe to MFC this to 10.1 or 10-STABLE? On Sun, Oct 19, 2014 at 4:04 PM, Benjamin Perrault ben.perra...@gmail.com wrote: After a few days of extensive testing and abuse, i’ve run into no new issues or unknowns what so

Re: HEADS UP: Merging projects/bhyve_svm to HEAD

2014-10-25 Thread Neel Natu
Hi, On Sat, Oct 25, 2014 at 3:50 PM, Zaphod Beeblebrox zbee...@gmail.com wrote: I tried to integrate this patch into 10.1_RC3 and I failed. Is there a timeframe to MFC this to 10.1 or 10-STABLE? It will be MFCed to 10-STABLE but I don't have a specific time frame in mind. I'll guess that