On Fri, Oct 24, 2014 at 3:03 AM, Konstantin Belousov
kostik...@gmail.com wrote:
Due to my mistake during the patch generation, i915.5.patch is just
a garbage.
Use https://www.kib.kiev.ua/kib/drm/i915.6.patch. I already have one
private report of the patch worked from person who got the same
* I can't get the NFS server to run V4 only. I have:
sysctl vfs.nfsd.server_min_nfsvers=4
I start all NFS-related services manually (from script)
#!/bin/sh
rpcbind -s -h 192.168.2.1
mountd -rnl -h 192.168.2.1
nfsd -ut -n 4 -h 192.168.2.1
nfsuserd
/etc/exports has:
V4: / -network
Garrett Cooper writes:
The message is telling you (indirectly) that you need to run make
buildworld successfully first?
Recapping:
Current system:
FreeBSD 9.3-RELEASE #0 r268512: Fri Jul 11 03:13:02 UTC 2014 i386
Source tree at CURRENT/r273626.
No
On Fri, 2014-10-24 at 21:06 -0400, owner-freebsd-curr...@freebsd.org
wrote:
roberth...@rcn.com writes:
I am now doing make buildkernel with TARGET/TARGET_ARCH on
the command line. For installkernel, do I need to use them also,
or will it magically know where to look?
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 10/25/14 03:07, Beeblebrox wrote:
* I can't get the NFS server to run V4 only. I have: sysctl
vfs.nfsd.server_min_nfsvers=4
[...]
PXE client's /etc/fstab is: 92.168.2.1:/data/amd64 / nfs
ro 0 0 192.168.2.1:/usr/local
Hi Russ,
PXE client's /etc/fstab is: 92.168.2.1:/data/amd64 / nfs
ro 0 0 192.168.2.1:/usr/local /usr/local nfs ro 0
Possibly need to arrange for mount_nfs to see -o nfsv4
(I use mount_nfs -o nfsv4,minorversion=1)
Yeah, that would work very likely and thanks.
From
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 10/25/14 09:58, Beeblebrox wrote:
Hi Russ,
PXE client's /etc/fstab is: 92.168.2.1:/data/amd64 / nfs
ro 0 0 192.168.2.1:/usr/local /usr/local nfs ro 0
Possibly need to arrange for mount_nfs to see -o nfsv4 (I use
Hello,
In short, nice kernel tasks people with C language skills can do in few
evenings.
https://wiki.freebsd.org/JuniorJobs
It is assumed you know how to obtain sources and build the kernel.
What you can get in return:
- your own code in FreeBSD tree
- eternal glory [1]
- fun [2]
If you are
Hi,
I can confirm v6 of the patch works for me with a r273559 kernel on a
i5-3320M notebook as well.
Only interesting new output to messages:
Oct 25 23:11:19 kernel: error: [drm:pid1159:gen6_sanitize_pm] *ERROR* Power
management discrepancy: GEN6_RP_INTERRUPT_LIMITS expected 0007, was
Beeblebrox wrote:
* I can't get the NFS server to run V4 only. I have:
sysctl vfs.nfsd.server_min_nfsvers=4
Hmm. With this set the NFS server shouldn't accept V2, 3
RPCs. The mount will work, since that is done by the Mount
protocol (mountd), but the client should be saying server
not
Russell L. Carter wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 10/25/14 03:07, Beeblebrox wrote:
* I can't get the NFS server to run V4 only. I have: sysctl
vfs.nfsd.server_min_nfsvers=4
[...]
PXE client's /etc/fstab is: 92.168.2.1:/data/amd64 / nfs
ro
Russell L. Carter wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 10/25/14 09:58, Beeblebrox wrote:
Hi Russ,
PXE client's /etc/fstab is: 92.168.2.1:/data/amd64 / nfs
ro 0 0 192.168.2.1:/usr/local /usr/local nfs ro 0
Possibly need to arrange for
Kostik wrote:
On Fri, Oct 24, 2014 at 04:43:28PM +0100, Robert Watson wrote:
On Thu, 23 Oct 2014, Rick Macklem wrote:
Someone just pinged me on this and I figured I should bring it
up.
1 - Is anyone out there still using oldnfs due to unresolved
problems with the new one?
I'm trying to build the current FreeBSD kernel, and that's what I get:
% sudo make buildkernel
--
Kernel build for GENERIC started on Sun Oct 26 01:39:13 MSK 2014
--
===
Russell L. Carter wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 10/25/14 09:58, Beeblebrox wrote:
Hi Russ,
PXE client's /etc/fstab is: 92.168.2.1:/data/amd64 / nfs
ro 0 0 192.168.2.1:/usr/local /usr/local nfs ro 0
Possibly need to arrange for
I tried to integrate this patch into 10.1_RC3 and I failed. Is there a
timeframe to MFC this to 10.1 or 10-STABLE?
On Sun, Oct 19, 2014 at 4:04 PM, Benjamin Perrault ben.perra...@gmail.com
wrote:
After a few days of extensive testing and abuse, i’ve run into no new
issues or unknowns what so
Hi,
On Sat, Oct 25, 2014 at 3:50 PM, Zaphod Beeblebrox zbee...@gmail.com wrote:
I tried to integrate this patch into 10.1_RC3 and I failed. Is there a
timeframe to MFC this to 10.1 or 10-STABLE?
It will be MFCed to 10-STABLE but I don't have a specific time frame in mind.
I'll guess that
17 matches
Mail list logo