Re: Possible zpool online, resilvering issue

2016-08-10 Thread Ultima
Hello, > I didn't see any reply on the list, so I thought I might let you know Sorry, never received this reply (till now) xD >what I assume is happening: > ZFS never updates data in place, which affects inode updates, e.g. if > a file has been read and access times must be updated. (For that

Signal 12 on make update (or any target in /usrc/src)

2016-08-10 Thread Matteo Riondato
Hi all, I recently upgraded from a late June (pre 11-branch, as far as I can tell) revision to r303771. Now, running “make update” (or buildworld, …) in /usr/src fails with a signal 12: matteo@triton:/usr/src$ sudo make update Password: *** Signal 12 Stop. make: stopped in /usr/src

Re: Signal 12 on make update (or any target in /usrc/src)

2016-08-10 Thread Konstantin Belousov
On Wed, Aug 10, 2016 at 10:33:23AM -0400, Matteo Riondato wrote: > Hi all, > > I recently upgraded from a late June (pre 11-branch, as far as I can tell) > revision to r303771. > > Now, running ???make update??? (or buildworld, ???) in /usr/src fails with a > signal 12: > >

Re: Signal 12 on make update (or any target in /usrc/src)

2016-08-10 Thread Matteo Riondato
> On Aug 10, 2016, at 10:41 AM, Konstantin Belousov wrote: > On Wed, Aug 10, 2016 at 10:33:23AM -0400, Matteo Riondato wrote: >> Hi all, >> >> I recently upgraded from a late June (pre 11-branch, as far as I can tell) >> revision to r303771. >> >> Now, running ???make

Re: Signal 12 on make update (or any target in /usrc/src)

2016-08-10 Thread Konstantin Belousov
On Wed, Aug 10, 2016 at 10:49:40AM -0400, Matteo Riondato wrote: > > > On Aug 10, 2016, at 10:41 AM, Konstantin Belousov > > wrote: > > On Wed, Aug 10, 2016 at 10:33:23AM -0400, Matteo Riondato wrote: > >> Hi all, > >> > >> I recently upgraded from a late June (pre

Re: Possible zpool online, resilvering issue

2016-08-10 Thread Ultima
> A new transaction group (TXG) is created at LEAST every > vfs.zfs.txg.timeout (defaults to 5) seconds. > f you offline a drive for hours or more, it must have all blocks with a > 'birth time' newer than the last transaction that was recorded on the > offlined drive replayed to catch that drive

Re: Possible zpool online, resilvering issue

2016-08-10 Thread Allan Jude
On 2016-08-10 12:53, Ultima wrote: > Hello, > >> I didn't see any reply on the list, so I thought I might let you know > > Sorry, never received this reply (till now) xD > >> what I assume is happening: > >> ZFS never updates data in place, which affects inode updates, e.g. if >> a file has

Re: Possible zpool online, resilvering issue

2016-08-10 Thread Stefan Esser
Am 10.08.2016 um 18:53 schrieb Ultima: > Hello, > >> I didn't see any reply on the list, so I thought I might let you know > > Sorry, never received this reply (till now) xD > >>what I assume is happening: > >> ZFS never updates data in place, which affects inode updates, e.g. if >> a file has

Re: Mosh regression between 10.x and 11-stable

2016-08-10 Thread john hood
On 8/10/16 4:18 AM, Peter Jeremy wrote: > I recently updated one of my VPS hosts from 10.3-RELEASE-p5 to 11.0-BETA4 > r303811 and mosh to that host from my Linux laptop stopped working. All > I get on the laptop is: > $ mosh remotehost > Connection to remotehost closed. > /usr/bin/mosh: Did not

Re: Mosh regression between 10.x and 11-stable

2016-08-10 Thread john hood
On 8/10/16 4:18 AM, Peter Jeremy wrote: > I recently updated one of my VPS hosts from 10.3-RELEASE-p5 to 11.0-BETA4 > r303811 and mosh to that host from my Linux laptop stopped working. All > I get on the laptop is: > $ mosh remotehost > Connection to remotehost closed. > /usr/bin/mosh: Did not

Re: Possible zpool online, resilvering issue

2016-08-10 Thread olli hauer
On 2016-08-04 07:22, Ultima wrote: > Hello, > > I recently had some issue with a PSU and ran several scrubs on a pool with > around 35T. Random drives would drop and require a zpool online, this found > checksum errors. (as expected) However, after all the scrubs I ran, I think > I may have found

Passwordless accounts vi ports!

2016-08-10 Thread O. Hartmann
I just checked the security scanning outputs of FreeBSD and found this surprising result: [...] Checking for passwordless accounts: polkitd::565:565::0:0:Polkit Daemon User:/var/empty:/usr/sbin/nologin pulse::563:563::0:0:PulseAudio System User:/nonexistent:/usr/sbin/nologin

Re: Passwordless accounts vi ports!

2016-08-10 Thread Ngie Cooper
> On Aug 10, 2016, at 22:05, O. Hartmann wrote: > > I just checked the security scanning outputs of FreeBSD and found this > surprising result: > > [...] > Checking for passwordless accounts: > polkitd::565:565::0:0:Polkit Daemon User:/var/empty:/usr/sbin/nologin >

Re: Passwordless accounts vi ports!

2016-08-10 Thread Kurt Jaeger
Hi! > I just checked the security scanning outputs of FreeBSD and found this > surprising result: > > [...] > Checking for passwordless accounts: > polkitd::565:565::0:0:Polkit Daemon User:/var/empty:/usr/sbin/nologin > pulse::563:563::0:0:PulseAudio System User:/nonexistent:/usr/sbin/nologin >

Re: Passwordless accounts vi ports!

2016-08-10 Thread O. Hartmann
On Thu, 11 Aug 2016 15:29:03 +1000 Dewayne Geraghty wrote: > Olivier, > I've checked my 10.3Stable systems and they all have '*' as their password, > which is consistent with /usr/ports/Mk/UIDs. You might like to check the > age of the latter. > Regards, Dewayne. > PS

Mosh regression between 10.x and 11-stable

2016-08-10 Thread Peter Jeremy
I recently updated one of my VPS hosts from 10.3-RELEASE-p5 to 11.0-BETA4 r303811 and mosh to that host from my Linux laptop stopped working. All I get on the laptop is: $ mosh remotehost Connection to remotehost closed. /usr/bin/mosh: Did not find mosh server startup message. I've tried

Re: kernel panic caused by virtualbox(?)

2016-08-10 Thread Jung-uk Kim
On 08/09/16 05:12 AM, Konstantin Belousov wrote: > On Mon, Aug 08, 2016 at 04:44:20PM -0700, Don Lewis wrote: >> On 8 Aug, Konstantin Belousov wrote: >>> On Mon, Aug 08, 2016 at 10:22:44AM -0700, John Baldwin wrote: On Thursday, August 04, 2016 05:10:29 PM Don Lewis wrote: > Reposted to

Re: kernel panic caused by virtualbox(?)

2016-08-10 Thread Don Lewis
On 10 Aug, Jung-uk Kim wrote: > On 08/09/16 05:12 AM, Konstantin Belousov wrote: >> On Mon, Aug 08, 2016 at 04:44:20PM -0700, Don Lewis wrote: >>> On 8 Aug, Konstantin Belousov wrote: On Mon, Aug 08, 2016 at 10:22:44AM -0700, John Baldwin wrote: > On Thursday, August 04, 2016 05:10:29 PM

Re: PORTS_MODULES breakage on HEAD

2016-08-10 Thread Bryan Drewery
On 8/7/16 5:44 PM, Don Lewis wrote: > Adding PORTS_MODULES=emulators/virtualbox-ose-kmod recently broke on > HEAD. When I do that I get this failure: > > ===> Ports module emulators/virtualbox-ose-kmod (all) > cd ${PORTSDIR:-/usr/ports}/emulators/virtualbox-ose-kmod; > PATH=/usr/obj/usr/src/ >